Quebec seeks singular identity in a polyglot world – The Globe and Mail

Another commentary on long-standing identity issues in Quebec by Jeffrey Simpson of the Globe. Quote:

There is something deeply French, in the widest sense of the term, in this proposed charter. The approach springs from civil law, Catholic and even Cartesian inspirations: that there are abstract values and universalistic rules to which the complexity of the human experience must be adapted – in contrast to the common-law approach, whereby the law emerges from real-life situations and evolves over time.

Fitting reality to concept, rather than the other way around, has contributed over the past 50 years to the existential debates over Quebec’s identity – debates that have also played out in federal politics with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and vocabulary such as “distinct society” pushed by Quebec politicians.

Quebec seeks singular identity in a polyglot world – The Globe and Mail.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – Range of articles and opinions

Lots of articles on the proposed Charte des valeurs québécoises today.

Starting with the petty, Bernard Landry’s rant against English Canada’s correct characterization of the proposed Charte as xenophobic.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – Landry fustige le Canada anglais | Le Devoir.

Paul Wells of Macleans takes his arguments down, noting that there is a rich debate within Quebec about the wisdom or not of such an approach, and stating this in Quebec/Rest of Canada terms is just an effort, cynical, to increase support.

Quebec’s latest turban controversy

A more reasonable approach, based on Bouchard-Taylor’s laïcité ouverte is picked up by Montreal municipal leaders, not surprisingly given the diversity of Montreal and how accommodation issues are largely matter of fact, in contrast to rural Quebec.

Les élus demandent une «laïcité à l’image de Montréal»

And the extreme position of a self-described militant laïque, Daniel Baril, which speaks for itself, as it assumes incompatibility with religious belief and performing one’s job, in government or out. Bit like the extreme atheism of Richard Dawkins is an extremist religion in itself.

Oui à une charte de la laïcité… avec correctifs

Laïcité – La CAQ s’estime moins «radicale» que le PQ | Le Devoir

Going further than Bouchard-Taylor with the extension to education. Not encouraging. NDP has staked out Bouchard-Taylor laïcité ouverte approach (only persons in position of legal authority) which is more reasonable than broader approach.

Laïcité – La CAQ s’estime moins «radicale» que le PQ | Le Devoir.

And on the lighter side, Natalie Brender’s ironic and satiric take on the Quebec Values Charter.

A modest proposal for Quebec and Canada: Brender | Toronto Star.

Marois believes Quebec will rally behind controversial secular charter – The Globe and Mail

Looks like it will be an ugly fall, with the PQ clearly planing to push their exclusionary and xenophobic Charte des valeurs québécoises. While I understand the particular sensitivities of Québec being a francophone minority in Anglo-Saxon (and Spanish) North America, excluding a wide-range of people from participating in government work has no justification.

Marois believes Quebec will rally behind controversial secular charter – The Globe and Mail.

Initial poll below is not encouraging (75% support for these restrictions) – but we shall see how the debate progresses in Québec and the degree to which the more open, tolerant and welcoming nature of Québec gets expressed.

Laïcité: fort appui au PQ  

Des manifs s’organisent contre la venue de prédicateurs islamistes | Fabrice de Pierrebourg | Montréal

Another illustration of the diversity of Islam in Canada, and appropriate that demonstrations take place to signal what is acceptable discourse in Canada.

Des manifs s’organisent contre la venue de prédicateurs islamistes | Fabrice de Pierrebourg | Montréal.

Federal Multiculturalism Minister concerned about Quebec religious-symbols ban – The Globe and Mail

A bit less strong than his tweet earlier this week, but recognition that the federal government cannot sit on the sidelines on this one.

My upcoming book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias, has a section that covers the multiculturalism/interculturalisme debates and some of the earlier challenges at both the political and official levels in deciding how and what level to respond.

Federal Multiculturalism Minister concerned about Quebec religious-symbols ban – The Globe and Mail.

Charte des valeurs: des juristes pro-laïcité éprouvent un malaise | PAUL JOURNET | Politique québécoise

Some interesting reserves from partisans of laïcité.

Charte des valeurs: des juristes pro-laïcité éprouvent un malaise | PAUL JOURNET | Politique québécoise.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – Some articles of interest

Some good articles today on the ongoing controversy about the leaked draft Charte des valeurs québécoises.

First, interview Jocelyn Maclure of Laval University on the appropriate balance between secular government and religious freedom of expression, essentially taking a position similar to the Bouchard-Taylor Commission:

Q&A: Quebec’s religious garb debate intensifies – Canada – CBC News.

A good analysis in La Presse about all the steps the PQ has not taken in preparing its draft and the implications for the debate and positioning, namely need for public consultations, trying to change the vocabulary from laïcité to valeurs, going far beyond Bouchard-Taylor in banning religious symbols for all government employees (not just those in authority), and how opposition parties are lined up (Liberals against, CAQ has yet to pronounce itself officially but appears to have some reserves, Québec solidaire against), and lastly it will be challenged in the courts.

Charte des valeurs québécoises: un chemin semé d’embûches

A good opinion piece by Lionel Perez – Maire de l’arrondissement de Côte-des-Neiges -Notre-Dame-de-Grâce (one of the most diverse areas of Montreal), on the need for an open definition of  laïcité, laïcité inclusive, not the narrow, exclusionary approach of the draft proposal:

La laïcité inclusive est une valeur québécoise

And Martin Patriquin of Macleans on some of the likely effects on employment  opportunities for immigrant and new Canadian women, as well as how the politics are playing out:

Surely you’re not comparing Pauline Marois to Vladimir Putin?

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir

In what can only be seen as playing to xenophobic tendencies, inspriré à la française, the Parti Québecois’s leaked proposal for a Charter of Quebec Values, that would exclude any government employee in any function (e.g., hospitals, schools, garbage collection, the list is endless) from wearing any religious sign. Laicisme extrème.

Rather than addressing the political reality of Quebec feelings of vulnerability through the more nuanced approach of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission’s laïcité ouverte (see Rapport Bouchard-Taylor – Pourquoi la laïcité ouverte ? | Le Devoir) , where the only those government posts where government neutrality must be explicit (e.g., law enforcement, judges, President of the Assemblée national), the PQ went for an exclusionary, divisive approach.

Encouragingly, whether it was a trial balloon, all opposition parties in the Assemblée nationale have spoken against it as have many Quebec commentators (in English Canada, when we poll people about comfort level with religious signs, discomfort increases with the degree of religiosity expressed, but people have largely come to terms with this as part of living in a diverse society). Expect of course that other views will also come out, as is normal in any public debate, and we shall see whether the PQ succeeds in making this a wedge issue.

And of course, no such law would survive challenge under any human rights legislation in Quebec or Canada, not to mention the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Lots written on this and a selection of articles below for those interested.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir.

 Opinion Quebec’s Putinesque idea to ban religious garb from public workplaces – Globe and Mail

Échecs identitaires La rentrée promet un retour en force de nos chicanes habituelles. Et la chicane la plus attendue est certainement le débat sur les «valeurs québécoises», Actualité

Turbans, kippas and crucifixes could be banned in Quebec public institutions under PQ proposal, National Post

L’interdiction des symboles religieux serait une erreur, selon Charles Taylor, La Presse

Turbans, hijabs, kippas face restrictions in Quebec, Macleans

Accommodements: la CAQ suivra les traces de Bouchard-Taylor | Jean-Marc Salvet | Politique

Encouraging. The Bouchard-Taylor Report was a voice of reason in Quebec debates,  laicisme-ouvert was a reasonable way to find a balance between personal expression and respect for the neutrality of the state, limited to when the state was in a position of authority and enforcement.

Of course, how it will play out ….

Accommodements: la CAQ suivra les traces de Bouchard-Taylor | Jean-Marc Salvet | Politique.