Provincial human rights commission slams proposed Quebec values charter and other charter news

Not surprisingly, the Quebec provincial human rights commission comes out against the proposed Charter. As the provincial charter can be amended by a simple majority vote in Quebec’s Assembée nationale, not an insurmountable obstacle.

The federal Charter of Rights and Freedoms, on the other hand, is in our Constitution and is not subject to easy amendment (in practice, likely impossible).

Provincial human rights commission slams proposed Quebec values charter – Need to know – Macleans.ca.

Attaque en règle contre la Charte des valeurs

And more fall-out from the Janettes, this time from well-known Quebec actress and director Denise Filiatraut, who apologized for characterizing women who wear the hijab as “follies” (fools).

Propos sur les musulmanes: Denise Filiatrault s’excuse

And naive and paternalistic commentary by Fabienne Larouche in Le Devoir, who, while advocating a strong secular approach, nevertheless wants a gradual process of integration and emancipation.

Naive, as many who wear the hijab are second-generation immigrants, and thus to assume an automatic “emancipation” from the hijab across generations runs against  experience. Looking at any old photos from before the 90s in most Muslim countries, one sees much less wearing of the hijab (see any university graduation photo – the contrasts are striking:

Ces femmes ont hérité d’une culture. Elles sont venues ici pour comprendre ce que notre culture à nous pouvait leur offrir de mieux. Donnons-leur du temps pour changer, s’adapter et permettre à leurs filles de s’émanciper comme les nôtres, mais sans oublier que cette émancipation est inévitable et que nous resterons inflexibles sur cet objectif. C’est tout.

But more fundamentally, this assumes that the only form of emancipation is not wearing the hijab; participation in politics, the workforce, other engagement with broader society is ignored. And such participation is a more important indicator of integration than the head covering worn by men or women.

Une Charte, chez nous…

Good enough for Nobel, but not for Quebec

Sheema Khan in The Globe, mocking the paternalism of Les feministes laiques de Québec and the “Janettes” (Les femmes voilées sont «manipulées», dit Janette Bertrand):

Feminism, we thought, was about empowering women to make choices for themselves. Instead, la feminisme laïque is the new patriarchy, with its condescending, my-way-or-the-highway attitude. But Muslim women are fusing a new breed of feminism, where spirituality melds with activism to advance the cause of both genders. Their role model is Malala – not Miley or Marois. Spirituality is seen not as an enemy, but as an ally in providing the impetus to seek equal opportunities for women in education, health, wealth and political participation.

Good enough for Nobel, but not for Quebec – The Globe and Mail.

And from within Quebec, the inevitable lettre ouverte replying to the Janettes, from “Les inclusives“. While the gradual inclusive approach to integration makes sense, may not necessarily end up with fewer hijabs in the end; but as long as women are participating in wider society, whether wearing a hijab or not, it doesn’t really matter:

…l’intégration des musulmanes voilées doit se faire petit à petit, sans brusquer les choses. «Ça prend trois générations pour intégrer un immigrant. Nous, on le fait souvent en deux générations. Mais si on commence à les bousculer, ça ne fonctionnera pas», dit-elle.

«C’est la société québécoise dans son ensemble qui va changer les valeurs de ces femmes. Leurs enfants vont fréquenter les garderies. Elles vont aller sur le marché du travail. Et les voiles vont tomber, un à un».

Les «inclusives» répliquent aux Janettes

Les femmes voilées sont «manipulées», dit Janette Bertrand

Some more articles on the Quebec values charter, starting with the assumption that all women who wear the hijab are manipulated (like all men who wear the kippa or turban or muslim head covering, presumably).

From the “Yvettes” of the 1980 referendum to the “Janettes” of today, the same arrogance, assumptions and insularity about others, the same transposition of the Quebec francophone experience of the 50s to today, and the same lack of appreciation of the complexity of the human condition.

Les femmes voilées sont «manipulées», dit Janette Bertrand | KATIA GAGNON | Actualités.

A nice vignette about the practicalities of the proposed Charter – Quebec does not have an accurate idea of how many public servants (core government, not sectors like health, education etc.) would be affected by the Charter, using the number that serve the public as a criteria. And as usual, Minister Drainville doesn’t see a problem:

Québec ignore le nombre de fonctionnaires qui travaillent avec le public

And no surprise, the latest group to criticize the Charter, this time mental health professionals:

Quebec charter of values slammed by mental-health professionals

Charte des valeurs: Québec songe à exclure la santé

Behind all the official reasons cited, there must be fear of losing qualified personnel. But if an exception for healthcare, why not for daycare or education?

Charte des valeurs: Québec songe à exclure la santé | Denis Lessard | Politique québécoise.

Sondage Léger – L’appui à la Charte se solidifie

The latest poll. While the numbers are up for the Charter, not clear whether this will translate into a majority PQ government. And on real issues – economy, healthcare, and education – the government is not doing well.

Sondage Léger – L’appui à la Charte se solidifie | Le Devoir.

Lisée préférerait que les candidats à la mairie de Montréal taisent leur opinion sur la Charte | Le Devoir

Not a good sign when the Minister responsible for Montreal, Jean-François Lisée, wants the mayoral candidates and other Montreal politicians to be quiet on the proposed Charter. Likely this will only invite more comment, and draw further attention to opposition to the Charter. While it may play well in the hinterland, we will see the overall impact over the next month or so.

Lisée préférerait que les candidats à la mairie de Montréal taisent leur opinion sur la Charte | Le Devoir.

PQ unhappy its values charter has become an issue in Montreal mayoral election

Québec songe à retirer le crucifix de l’Assemblée nationale

Interesting. Rather than exploring the opening by former premiers Parizeau, Bouchard and Landry, we come back to the crucifix in the National Assembly. Likely a trial balloon. But no right for institutions or municipalities to have exemptions from the proposed Charter, save for a transition period.

Québec songe à retirer le crucifix de l’Assemblée nationale | Denis Lessard | Politique québécoise.

El laïcisme del Quebec i altres dubtes | Marc Bassets

My first international interview in the Catalan newspaper, La Vanguardia. Given the similarities between some of the identity issues in Catalonia and Quebec, a fair degree of interest in Quebec debates. One of my quotes:

Para Griffith, autor de un ensayo y un blog sobre el multiculturalismo, los signos religiosos deben permitirse “mientras no interfieran en las obligaciones del servidor público. Voy a un hospital. La enfermera me saca sangre. Lleva hiyab. ¿Y qué?”, dice. Impedir a alguien trabajar para el Estado y practicar su fe “excluye y ofrece a las personas menos oportunidades”.

El laïcisme del Quebec i altres dubtes | Marc Bassets.

Charter all part of the Péquistes’ cynical plan

Andrew Cohen on the proposed Charter. While I agree on his overall assessment on the cynicism of the PQ for playing identity politics, I am not sure that all is working out as well as he portrays for the PQ. Yes, the debate has been largely between Montreal and the hinterland (but Quebec city and Sherbrooke will likely also have reserves), the divisions among the sovereignist ranks, and the strong opposition from the healthcare sector among others make this strategy less of a slam dunk than I think the PQ anticipated. We shall see.

The Jews, Muslims, immigrants and anyone else with eyes see the Quebec Charter of Values for what it is: the sad, fearful cry of a tribal society led by well-tailored cynics.

Charter all part of the Péquistes’ cynical plan.

Why Ottawa’s right to procrastinate on the values charter – The Globe and Mail

Tom Flanagan on the Quebec values charter and why one needs to let the internal QC debate take its course, which will likely end up reasonably. A stronger position in favour of provincial, rather than individual rights than many.

Given the tenor of QC debates to date, and just how poorly the proposed Charter has been received, he is largely right, although it was necessary for all federal politicians to lay down some markers.

Why Ottawa’s right to procrastinate on the values charter – The Globe and Mail.