Charte des valeurs québécoises – Some articles of interest

Some good articles today on the ongoing controversy about the leaked draft Charte des valeurs québécoises.

First, interview Jocelyn Maclure of Laval University on the appropriate balance between secular government and religious freedom of expression, essentially taking a position similar to the Bouchard-Taylor Commission:

Q&A: Quebec’s religious garb debate intensifies – Canada – CBC News.

A good analysis in La Presse about all the steps the PQ has not taken in preparing its draft and the implications for the debate and positioning, namely need for public consultations, trying to change the vocabulary from laïcité to valeurs, going far beyond Bouchard-Taylor in banning religious symbols for all government employees (not just those in authority), and how opposition parties are lined up (Liberals against, CAQ has yet to pronounce itself officially but appears to have some reserves, Québec solidaire against), and lastly it will be challenged in the courts.

Charte des valeurs québécoises: un chemin semé d’embûches

A good opinion piece by Lionel Perez – Maire de l’arrondissement de Côte-des-Neiges -Notre-Dame-de-Grâce (one of the most diverse areas of Montreal), on the need for an open definition of  laïcité, laïcité inclusive, not the narrow, exclusionary approach of the draft proposal:

La laïcité inclusive est une valeur québécoise

And Martin Patriquin of Macleans on some of the likely effects on employment  opportunities for immigrant and new Canadian women, as well as how the politics are playing out:

Surely you’re not comparing Pauline Marois to Vladimir Putin?

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir

In what can only be seen as playing to xenophobic tendencies, inspriré à la française, the Parti Québecois’s leaked proposal for a Charter of Quebec Values, that would exclude any government employee in any function (e.g., hospitals, schools, garbage collection, the list is endless) from wearing any religious sign. Laicisme extrème.

Rather than addressing the political reality of Quebec feelings of vulnerability through the more nuanced approach of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission’s laïcité ouverte (see Rapport Bouchard-Taylor – Pourquoi la laïcité ouverte ? | Le Devoir) , where the only those government posts where government neutrality must be explicit (e.g., law enforcement, judges, President of the Assemblée national), the PQ went for an exclusionary, divisive approach.

Encouragingly, whether it was a trial balloon, all opposition parties in the Assemblée nationale have spoken against it as have many Quebec commentators (in English Canada, when we poll people about comfort level with religious signs, discomfort increases with the degree of religiosity expressed, but people have largely come to terms with this as part of living in a diverse society). Expect of course that other views will also come out, as is normal in any public debate, and we shall see whether the PQ succeeds in making this a wedge issue.

And of course, no such law would survive challenge under any human rights legislation in Quebec or Canada, not to mention the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Lots written on this and a selection of articles below for those interested.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir.

 Opinion Quebec’s Putinesque idea to ban religious garb from public workplaces – Globe and Mail

Échecs identitaires La rentrée promet un retour en force de nos chicanes habituelles. Et la chicane la plus attendue est certainement le débat sur les «valeurs québécoises», Actualité

Turbans, kippas and crucifixes could be banned in Quebec public institutions under PQ proposal, National Post

L’interdiction des symboles religieux serait une erreur, selon Charles Taylor, La Presse

Turbans, hijabs, kippas face restrictions in Quebec, Macleans

And then there were 2… multiculturalism ministers on the cabinet roster – Inside Politics

More from Kady O’Malley on her series ‘would the real Minister for Multiculturalism please stand up’. I think in practice it will be less confusing for outside observers as Minister Kenney will be the main public face of multiculturalism and is clearly the senior political minister. Officials will adjust as they must, the focus of the program will be political, given the importance of ethnic communities as the ‘fourth sister’ of electoral strategies.

Not elegant from a machinery of government perspective but a totally understandable and rational, from a political perspective decision (even if the former official in me groans about what it means for the long-term health of the multiculturalism program).

And then there were 2… multiculturalism ministers on the cabinet roster – Inside Politics.

My Book – Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Printing Proof Stage

Just finished the final edits – substantive, copy and formatting. On track for September 16 release. Good feeling, now on to pre-production and marketing.

Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks: Multiculturalism ‘Has Had Its Day’

Although it starts off with the usual mischaracterization of multiculturalism (or the European interpretation to be charitable) as separate and parallel communities, Lord Sacks fundamental messages are strong and positive ones about the balance between one’s personal identity and participation in broader society:

  • Don’t impose your views on the majority population;
  • Be ‘bilingual’ – be able to negotiate your civic and faith or other identities: “you know you are Jewish and you’re English and you have to negotiate that, which I think is actually good for the soul, because it forces you to realise that actually society and life is complicated. It mustn’t and can’t be simplified.”
  • Recognize that being a minority will at times be uncomfortable (e.g., antisemitism, other forms of discrimination).

Could have been more about the role of the majority in accommodation, as all groups play a role in making diverse, multicultural societies find that balance between  particular and  general identities.

Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks: Multiculturalism ‘Has Had Its Day’.

Accommodements: la CAQ suivra les traces de Bouchard-Taylor | Jean-Marc Salvet | Politique

Encouraging. The Bouchard-Taylor Report was a voice of reason in Quebec debates,  laicisme-ouvert was a reasonable way to find a balance between personal expression and respect for the neutrality of the state, limited to when the state was in a position of authority and enforcement.

Of course, how it will play out ….

Accommodements: la CAQ suivra les traces de Bouchard-Taylor | Jean-Marc Salvet | Politique.

Immigration policy wasn’t always about economics alone: Brender | Toronto Star

Good reminder of some of the broader issues and objectives around immigration by Natalie Brender, along with the concomitant need for refugee and family class advocates to develop more rigorous reasoning and rationales.

Just saying that these categories are important and valuable is not enough. After all, even some of the economic arguments that everyone ‘accepts’ have also been criticized by some as simplistic (i.e., Collacott, Paquet) or wrong.

It should be possible for advocates for more refugees and family class to argue more convincingly on the comparative benefits between economic, family class and refugees, than stating what they believe to be an article of faith.

Immigration policy wasn’t always about economics alone: Brender | Toronto Star.

The truth of multicultural Britain | World news | The Observer

Balanced overview of multiculturalism and diversity in Britain, with some encouraging information regarding comparable income levels and other indicators. And, as always, some data gaps.

The truth of multicultural Britain | World news | The Observer.

Has Multiculturalism in Canada Lost Its Way? | Omar Alghabra

An opinion piece by Omar Alghabra, former Liberal MP, on multiculturalism, reinforcing messages of integration and our common humanity. Much of the Conservative government reset of multiculturalism is in this direction, with its focus on integration and commonalities, while managing the delicate balance of  having targeted messages and strategies to address particular communities at the same time.

Has Multiculturalism in Canada Lost Its Way? | Omar Alghabra.

Marketers are missing the multicultural opportunity | Marketing magazine

Multiculturalism as mainstream marketing in Australia.

Marketers are missing the multicultural opportunity | Marketing magazine.