Why Muslims should love secularism

A good piece by Hussein Ibish on secularism and Islam, and how false definitions of secularism have been misappropriated, and that secularism offers, given the diversity within Islam and other religions, “religious freedom, religious authenticity, and religious meaning”:

What devout Muslims need to understand is that real secularism alone offers them something most of them seem to badly want: freedom. If there really is no compulsion in religion, only a secular society can provide that. Only in a secular system can Muslims be free to practice Islam exactly as they see fit. Any \”Islamic\” polity will of necessity be imposing a particular version or interpretation of Islam, which is an extremely heterodox set of traditions.

The claim that secularism is really just Christianity in disguise is manifestly false. The language is European, inherited from the Enlightenment. But both Western chauvinists and anti-Western demagogues badly misread the fact that although the specific language of modern human rights and freedoms is, for historical reasons, currently packaged in Western terms, this hardly means that they lack non-Western cognates, origins, or bases.

Since at least the 10th century, most Muslim societies have distinguished between political and religious authority, and it\’s absurd to claim that religious freedom originates only or even mainly as a concept from the Protestant Reformation. There are deep roots in both traditional and modern interpretations of Islam that lend themselves to political secularism.

Why Muslims should love secularism.

Quebec Values Charter – Analysis of Strategy

A few good pieces of analysis of the PQ strategy in tabling a more doctrinaire and rigid version of the Quebec Values Charter, starting with Terrence McKenna of the CBC:

The political strategy behind Quebec’s values charter – Canada – CBC News.

And Martin Patriquin of Macleans,

There are evident risks to this strategy. Successive polls (like this one) suggest Quebecers are far less worried about what’s on a woman’s head than what the mobster is stuffing into his sock. As Parizeau’s sortie demonstrates, the charter has divided the sovereignist movement itself. There are inevitable court challenges should the proposed bill become law. And though Drainville et al. are loath to talk about it, there is the sticky matter of enforcement: what happens when, not if, a Muslim, Sikh, Jew, Christian refuses to remove his or her religious accoutrement?

But these are logical considerations, and logic has no place in pride. In one form or another, CALVDLEDNRDLEAQDEELFELHEELDDA (the French an acronym) is now a political inevitability in Quebec. God help us all.

Why the PQ won’t back down – Blog Central, Martin Patriquin – Macleans.ca

Lastly, Bernard Descoteaux of Le Devoir, on the electoral and political risks:

Il est certain, si le gouvernement Marois maintient la ligne dure, que le projet de loi 60 ne pourra être adopté tant qu’il est en situation minoritaire. Pour peu que l’appui populaire que recueille la Charte des valeurs se maintienne, il aurait là l’argument qui le justifierait à demander aux Québécois un mandat majoritaire. Le pari est risqué. Sous un gouvernement libéral, ce projet de loi 60, comme d’autres qui sont actuellement en plan, notamment le projet de loi 14 amendant la Charte de la langue française, sera enterré pour longtemps. Une telle approche est un quitte ou double dangereux. Inutile aussi puisque la Coalition avenir Québec est ouverte au dialogue.

Avec son appui, le gouvernement pourrait faire adopter l’essentiel de ce projet. Il y aurait des compromis, mais ce serait mieux que rien du tout. L’objectif de ce projet est d’assurer « la diversité de la société québécoise dans l’harmonie », nous dit la première ministre Marois. Pour cela, est-il indispensable de tout régir dans le moindre détail ? Bien sûr que non.

Projet de loi 60 – Un quitte ou double? | Le Devoir

Charte: réactions

Some reactions to the tabling of the proposed Quebec Charter, starting with the leader of the provincial liberal party (who has been consistent throughout the debate):

Charte: une attaque frontale contre les droits, selon Couillard | Martin Ouellet | Politique québécoise.

A good summary of reactions by Quebec associations and groups to the tabling of the Charter, with the same groups opposed as before given the hardening of the provisions of the Charter:

Charte: des associations réagissent | Pierre Saint-Arnaud | Politique québécoise

Charte – Les communautésculturelles déçues

And commentary by Gérard Bouchard and Charles Taylor, reiterating their opposition to the Charter:

Charles Taylor et Gérard Bouchard dénoncent une charte nuisible

And from federal politicians,

Federal politicians of all stripes denounce Quebec values bill

Kevin Page calls for public service renewal from the ‘ground up’

While I think Kevin nails the lack of senior level leadership on public service renewal (and his dismissal of initiatives like BluePrint 2020 as an “empty vessel without a rudder”), I am not sure, given the hierarchical nature of the public service, that a grass-roots initiative is workable. But his diagnostique is bang on.

Kevin Page calls for public service renewal from the ‘ground up’.

Charte des valeurs: Drainville défend le titre du projet de loi

Although the official reason for the 28 word title is to blame the lawyers, strikes me some focus group targeted messaging at play.

Charte des valeurs: Drainville défend le titre du projet de loi | Jocelyne Richer | Politique québécoise.

PQ values charter gets a new, 28-word name – Canada, Need to know – Macleans.ca

And the actual tabling of the bill shows few surprises, with only the healthcare sector getting a renewable exemption:

La Charte des «valeurs de laïcité» est déposée

The actual text:

Le projet de loi sur la Charte des valeurs (PDF)

Ensuring the electoral and civic involvement of Canada’s immigrant communities

Good piece by Ratna Omidvar of Maytree on some of the challenges in political involvement of ethnic communities. While much of the focus to date has been on electoral representation, more qualified assessment of “back room” involvement and roles and influence of elected representatives (e.g., looking at the current federal and provincial governments, ethnic community parliamentarians largely have secondary roles)l.

Ensuring the electoral and civic involvement of Canada’s immigrant communities.

Does Murdoch’s multiculturalism light Abbott’s path to the future?

For those interested in Australian multicultural debates, some criticism from the left on what appears to be the Abbott government’s approach. Some similarities to Canadian conservatives (who were also inspired in some of their early thinking by the Howard government on citizenship and multiculturalism):

Does Murdoch’s multiculturalism light Abbott’s path to the future?.

Departing FECCA chair holds fears for multiculturalism | SBS News

Une Charte des valeurs sans compromis

Consistent with all the PQ government signals to date. Given that elections will not take place this fall, unclear how this will play in the political calculations as economic issues will likely reassert themselves in the spring, when provincial (and federal) budgets are normally presented.

Will be interesting to follow the parliamentary hearings on the proposed Charter and whether this starts to shift the terms of debate.

And it appears the proposed Charter is silent on the question of the crucifix in the Assemblée nationale.

Will post link to the full text tomorrow.

Une Charte des valeurs sans compromis | Le Devoir.

Barbara Kay: Banning hijabs won’t halt honour killings

A good piece by Barbara Kay on the recent report by Quebec’s Status of Women Committee on honour killings and the lack of linkage to the wearing or not of religious headgear like the hijab.

If the Quebec government believes that the forced removal of a hijab will mitigate against centuries of a cultural tradition so strong that people prefer a lifetime in jail rather than tolerate what we would call normal female autonomy, they are dreaming in technicolour. Quebec’s Status of Women report treats a serious subject with the concern, objectivity, ideological neutrality and earnestness it deserves. The Quebec government has no business exploiting the good faith of its writers and the tragic deaths of innocent girls and women to further its secularist agenda.

Barbara Kay: Banning hijabs won’t halt honour killings | National Post.

A fast-food lesson: Voting should be by residency, not citizenship

I disagree. With citizenship relatively easy and quick to get in Canada (under 5 years), no reason to provide municipal voting rights as most other countries with municipal voting rights have longer citizenship eligibility periods (and arguably use this to reduce pressure for a more facilitative citizenship acquisition process).

A fast-food lesson: Voting should be by residency, not citizenship – The Globe and Mail.