Highly skilled immigrants are twice as likely to leave Canada, report shows

Makes sense, given the more educated have more mobility possibilities. But nevertheless highlights the retention issue:

The more educated an immigrant is, the more likely they are to leave Canada, a new report on immigration data and patterns suggests.

It comes as the federal immigration and health ministers testified on barriers to attracting immigrants to work in the health care sector on Tuesday.

New immigrants are leaving Canada “at near-record rates, with highly educated and highly skilled immigrants leaving Canada at twice the rate of those with less education and lower skills,” a new report by the Institute of Canadian Citizenship and the Conference Board of Canada found.

The ICC releases an annual report which studies the causes of onward migration — or migration of people first into, then out of Canada using data from Statistics Canada.

The likelihood of leaving Canada goes up as the level of education increases, the report found….

Source: Highly skilled immigrants are twice as likely to leave Canada, report shows

Report link: https://forcitizenship.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-Leaky-Bucket-2025-Nov.-17.pdf

Lisée: Jungle identitaire

Interesting commentary regarding the latest report by the commissaire à la langue française, Benoît Dubreuil, Intégration à la nation québécoise:

…En comparaison, il est beaucoup plus agréable d’être entre immigrants ou avec des anglophones, dont la composition ethnique est plus diversifiée, dont la langue est plus facile, où les accents divers sont plus acceptés, et où la pression pour s’intégrer à une culture précise n’existe tout simplement pas.

Et c’est là qu’on trouve la spécificité du cas québécois. Dans le monde entier, les ados sont rustres, et l’intégration, difficile. En Allemagne, au Chili ou au Cambodge, il n’y a pas d’autre choix que celui de l’intégration à la langue et à la culture de la société d’accueil, même lorsqu’elle accueille mal. Ici, un autre univers est à portée de main, l’anglophone.

Dubreuil nous apprend qu’une fois l’enfer du secondaire traversé, les tensions s’atténuent au cégep et à l’université. La maturité des uns et des autres y est pour quelque chose. Mais ce passage a laissé des traces. Les enfants d’immigrants connaissent le français, mais l’utilisent moins que les immigrants de première génération. On est en présence d’une acquisition, puis d’une distanciation de l’expérience québécoise, à la fois présente, mais étrangère.

Le commissaire propose, pour juguler ce phénomène, un gigantesque chantier, multiforme, d’intégration. Sa créativité force l’admiration. On voudrait partager sa détermination et son volontarisme. Peut-être y arriverons-nous, après avoir digéré la douleur générée par ses constats.

Source: Jungle identitaire

….In comparison, it is much more pleasant to be among immigrants or with Anglophones, whose ethnic composition is more diverse, whose language is easier, where diverse accents are more accepted, and where the pressure to integrate into a specific culture simply does not exist.


And this is where we find the specificity of the Quebec case. All over the world, teenagers are rude, and integration is difficult. In Germany, Chile or Cambodia, there is no choice but to integrate into the language and culture of the host society, even when it is poorly welcomed. Here, another universe is at hand, the English-speaking.


Dubreuil tells us that once the high school hell is crossed, tensions ease at CEGEP and university. The maturity of each other has something to do with it. But this passage left traces. Immigrant children know French, but use it less than first-generation immigrants. We are in the presence of an acquisition, then a distancing from the Quebec experience, both present but foreign.


The commissioner proposes, to curb this phenomenon, a gigantic, multifaceted integration project. His creativity forces admiration. We would like to share his determination and voluntarism. Maybe we will get there, after digesting the pain generated by his observations.

C-3 Citizenship by Descent: Senate Report Observations

The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology has the honour to present its

As expected, sailed through without amendments. Observations focussed on inter country adoptees (more of an recognition and identify issue than a practical one, as adoptees would have to live in the province of adoption and thus meet the residency test) and the need for modernization of the Citizenship Act. No concern about the operational impact and the data gaps (unfortunately, as expected):

SECOND REPORT

Your committee, to which was referred Bill C-3, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (2025), has, in obedience to the order of reference of Thursday, November 6, 2025, examined the said bill and now reports the same without amendment but with certain observations, which are appended to this report.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEMARY MOODIE

Chair

Observations to the second report of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (Bill C-3)

Bill C-3 represents meaningful progress in addressing injustices faced by many “Lost Canadians.” However, your Committee notes a continuing gap affecting some intercountry adoptees: children born abroad, adopted by Canadian parents living in Canada, and brought into the country through a rigorous and highly regulated adoption process governed by provincial/territorial laws and international obligations, including the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption.

Your Committee therefore encourages the Government of Canada to undertake further study and consider targeted legislative reforms to ensure that all intercountry adoptees are treated equivalently to Canadian-born adopted children with respect to citizenship acquisition and transmission.

Your Committee observes that the Citizenship Act has become increasingly complex and difficult for Canadians to understand. Given the many piecemeal amendments over decades, the Act would benefit from comprehensive modernization, including the adoption of plain-language drafting techniques.

Simplifying the Act would enhance public understanding, reduce administrative burdens, and ensure that Canadians can more easily know and exercise their citizenship rights and responsibilities.

Your Committee notes that Bill C-3 resolves many long-standing inequities relating to Lost Canadians but does not fully address all categories of affected persons.

Your Committee therefore encourages further study to identify remaining gaps and to support the development of future legislation that ensures all Canadians — whether by birth, adoption, or descent — are treated with fairness, consistency, and dignity.

Source: C-3 Citizenship by Descent: Senate Report Observations

LILLEY: Time to end foreign flag-raising ceremonies at city halls across Canada

Agree:

Calgary Mayor Jeromy Farkas has an idea that should be adopted at city halls across the country — end the practice of raising flags of other countries. It’s one thing for the federal government in Ottawa to follow protocol and fly the flag of a visiting foreign dignitary; that’s accepted and expected.

Municipalities, though, have no role in foreign affairs, and this practice, which likely started as a unifying measure, is now divisive, which is why Farkas says he wants to see it end.

“Calgary’s flag policy means any country recognized by Canada may have their flag flown at City Hall on their national day. But national flag-raisings are now creating division,” Farkas said last week.

Flag-raising policies now creating division, not unity

We’ve seen those divisions recently in attempts to get the raising of the Israeli flag cancelled at various city halls and now we’ve seen that with the Palestinian flag raising since Canada officially recognized a Palestinian State in September. Flag raisings over the past few days in cities like Mississauga and Toronto have been incredibly divisive and even involved attempted court injunctions.

Of note regarding the City of Calgary policy — and it appears similar for Toronto — we could be raising the flags of countries that we shouldn’t really be honouring all simply because the federal government recognizes the existence of that state.

City Council does not have legal authority to determine which countries Canada recognizes. Under our existing policy, any national flag request that meets the criteria must be considered equally,” he wrote.

Canadian cities recognizing countries with widespread human-rights abuses

By recognizing the Palestinian State, the Carney government is recognizing a state government in part, some would argue in whole, by a terrorist group. Hamas, which governs Gaza, is clearly a terrorist group and the Palestinian Authority, which is in charge of the West Bank, is an organization that doesn’t hold elections and is credibly accused of arbitrary arrest and torture, extrajudicial killings and other human rights abuses.

It goes beyond just this conflict in the Middle East, though. Toronto has held flag raising ceremonies this year for several countries with questionable human rights records that we wouldn’t want to celebrate.

On Oct. 9, we raised the flag of Uganda at Toronto City Hall, a country where basic rights such as freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and association are all curtailed and where homosexuality is punishable by death. This isn’t exactly the type of country that we should be celebrating with a ceremony at City Hall, the flag is a symbol of the government in charge and that government is repressive.

Similar complaints, though not as harsh, could be made against Angola. Their flag was raised on Nov. 12 at Toronto City Hall.

This past May 23, Calgary raised the flag of Eritrea, a country accused of widespread human rights abuses including extrajudicial killings and sexual violations, specifically in the Tigray region which is disputed with Ethiopia. Toronto raised Ethiopia’s flag on Sept. 11, despite their government facing many of the same accusations.

Both countries criminalize same-sex relations and yet here are two Canadian cities — likely more — celebrating and honouring these countries. Raising the flag that represents the regime in place does not honour the people, the diaspora living here, it is an honour to the repressive regime in place.

Honouring foreign regimes doesn’t represent local communities

Can you imagine seeing the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran flying at a government facility in Canada? It should never happen, but with these policies in place, it clearly could.

That’s why Calgary’s mayor wants to move a motion this week to end the practice.

It’s a good move; let’s hope it passes and then is replicated across the country.

Source: LILLEY: Time to end foreign flag-raising ceremonies at city halls across Canada

Alberta tables bill to add citizenship mark, health-care numbers to driver’s licences

The post 9/11 enhanced drivers licences issued by some provinces included citizenship but were all discontinued by 2019. NEXUS has largely replaced the need. Alberta’s inclusion of citizenship markers will not, of course, be accepted by US authorities:

Alberta’s government has tabled legislation to add health-care numbers and mandatory citizenship markers to driver’s licences and identification cards.

The government had announced its plans to do so earlier this year, leading critics to say the province was creating privacy concerns rather than protecting against them. 

Critics at the time said someone’s citizenship status would become known in unnecessary situations, such as purchasing alcohol.

Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally told reporters Monday that having citizenship markers on driver’s licences and other forms of identification is only meant to streamline access to services.

“When you’re applying for future benefits from the government of Alberta, it’s going to make it easier for you because you’re not going to have to produce a birth certificate. It’s going to be on your driver’s licence,” said Nally.

“Let’s be clear, that’s what this is about. This is about making it easier for Albertans to access services.”

Nally, and Premier Danielle Smith, had previously said adding citizenship markers — which will read “CAN” — to licences and ID cards was also about preventing election fraud and routing out potentially fake health-care numbers, but the minister didn’t mention either concern on Monday….

Source: Alberta tables bill to add citizenship mark, health-care numbers to driver’s licences

Savoie: If Canada wants to recapture the national ambition of the 1960s, it must seriously cut the bloat

Agree on need to focus on programs and whether or not they are making a significant difference in terms of concrete outcomes. Requires a government willing to expend political capital:

A more promising approach is to take a look at programs that have passed their best-before dates and scrutinize the growing number of departments and agencies. For one, Ottawa should be asking if we still need seven regional agencies. The federal government should try harder to stay in its lane and deal with its core responsibilities, such as national defence. It should also ask provinces to look after their constitutional responsibilities, thus avoiding costly duplications. 

Another place for cuts would be the Canada School of Public Service, which spends $94-million annually and, beyond its responsibility for second-language training, would be hard-pressed to show it has contributed to better management. France did away with its École Nationale d’Administration in 2021 and Britain shut down its National School of Government in 2012. The United States, meanwhile, has long rejected efforts to establish a Public Service Academy. 

There are many other government agencies that should be reviewed, particularly given Ottawa’s difficult fiscal situation. Parliament should also ask if it needs nine officers, when other Commonwealth parliaments make do with less; Australia, for example, has only four. Dealing with these questions would let the whale swim like it did in the 1960s. 

As is often the case, Ottawa has a well-honed capacity to define a new approach and new policies. Where it fails is in the implementation. The test will be not in announcing new projects, but in how Ottawa will declutter the machinery of government and empower those on the front line trying to make the approach work.

Source: If Canada wants to recapture the national ambition of the 1960s, it must seriously cut the bloat

McMartin: How long must I live in Canada before I am no longer a colonist or settler?

Valid concern. I am always amused by op-eds or articles by new arrivals who adopt this language, apparently not considering some of the hypocrisy involved:

…In the modern context — in the context in which William’s history and, by association, my history are now being refigured — William’s emigration to Canada was not the stuff of dire need, or daring in the face of events beyond his control, or the stuff of nation-building. There is no recognition, appreciation or accounting of William as an individual dealing with forces greater than himself.

But there is government-sanctioned shame and remorse.

And the indelible stain of trespass.

And the attendant name-calling of “colonialist,” “occupier,” and “settler” — all meant not only to demonize William’s and my history, but to delegitimize it. There are the performative apologies that, while purporting to recognize that this stage play or children’s Christmas concert is taking place on the unceded territory of the local First Nation, they really serve to remind us that all non-Indigenous history is one of thievery.

And I get it.

And to a great degree I agree, because the fury and anger of the Indigenous Peoples in Canada is justified. The history is undeniable. The deaths, displacement and Eurocentric supremacist racism suffered by the Indigenous Peoples took place, and is still taking place. And I cannot deny the fact that my family prospered under the rule of successive colonial and post-Confederation governments while those governments marginalized Indigenous populations.

But.

While enlightened initiatives like truth and reconciliation speak well of Canada’s attempt to heal long-standing wounds, there is the real danger here that reconciliation can quickly become resentment and retrenchment, as we have seen in the U.S. and in Europe, where hard-right political parties, fighting race and cultural wars, have ridden popular resentment to the top of the polls and formed governments….

Source: Opinion: How long must I live in Canada before I am no longer a colonist or settler?

Les immigrants réclament une clause de droits acquis pour le PEQ

Understandable. Always creates problems when rules and regulations change without grandfather clauses or other transition measures:

Le ministre de l’Immigration, Jean-François Roberge, a provoqué une onde de choc dans la communauté immigrante en annonçant la semaine dernière l’abolition du Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ), une voie rapide pour accéder à la résidence permanente. Appelant à une vaste mobilisation à Québec lundi, des candidats à l’immigration réclament le rétablissement du PEQ et une clause de droits acquis (communément appelée clause « grand-père » sous l’influence de l’anglais) pour ceux et celles qui sont déjà sur le territoire, et dont le rêve québécois est désormais menacé….

Au cabinet du ministre Roberge, on dit comprendre les inquiétudes, mais on indique qu’aucune clause de droits acquis n’est envisagée. Les demandes reçues avant la suspension du programme seront traitées et toutes les nouvelles demandes devront être transmises par l’entremise du nouveau PSTQ, où « les diplômés du Québec qui ont une expérience de travail et les travailleurs étrangers déjà sur le territoire » seront favorisés.

Source: Les immigrants réclament une clause de droits acquis pour le PEQ

Illegal migration tearing UK apart, Mahmood says

Will see what today’s announcement and details reveals:

Illegal migration is “tearing the country apart”, the home secretary has said, as she prepares to unveil major plans to overhaul asylum policy.

New measures set to be announced by Shabana Mahmood on Monday will include people granted asylum needing to wait 20 years before they can apply to settle permanently.

The plans will also see those granted asylum have their refugee status regularly reviewed and those whose home countries are then deemed safe told to return.

Mahmood told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme she saw tackling illegal migration as a “moral mission”.

Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the Conservatives would deport illegal migrants “within a week”, while Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called for asylum seekers to have the right to work.

The changes are aimed at making the UK a less attractive destination for illegal migrants, leading to reduced small boat crossings and asylum claims.

Mahmood is also to announce the UK will stop granting visas to people from Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo if their governments do not rapidly improve co-operation on removals.

A Home Office source said the countries were being targeted “for their unacceptably low co-operation and obstructive returns processes”.

As first reported in the Times the threat of the visa ban for certain countries comes after thousands of illegal migrants and criminals from the three nations were said to be in the UK.

Many specific details and practicalities of the sweeping changes to asylum policy are yet to be made clear, and will be set out by Mahmood on Monday…..

Source: Illegal migration tearing UK apart, Mahmood says

Senate urged to give children adopted from overseas the same citizenship rights as those born in Canada 

Perhaps I am a bit thick, but parents of foreign-born adoptees have to commit to raising their adopted child in Canada and thus would most likely meet the residency requirement of 1,095 days within a five-year period.  

The direct route to citizenship for adoptees was in response to parental pressure to have a faster route than PR sponsorship. But making that choice meant the adopted child was considered the first generation born abroad, like any naturally born child born abroad.

Appears more a matter of identity and convenience rather than fundamental practicalities to me:

….Two lawyers specializing in citizenship have submitted a briefing paper to the Senate committee, which will consider Bill C-3 this week. They argue that the bill should exempt children adopted from abroad from the substantial-connection test. 

The paper’s co-author, Toronto lawyer Sujit Choudhry, who filed the successful constitutional challenge to the Citizenship Act on behalf of Lost Canadian clients, said it is “deeply unfair to the families of these children to treat them differently than children adopted domestically.”

“It also violates Canada’s international treaty obligations and the Charter,” he said in an e-mail. 

Its other author, immigration lawyer Maureen Silcoff, suggested that unless Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada addresses the issue it could face a legal challenge. 

“IRCC is fully aware of the issue. Adoptive parents and MPs have been advocating on their behalf for years. We do not understand their reluctance to address this issue at this moment, when C-3 is before Parliament. Amending C-3 would avoid unnecessary litigation.”

Don Chapman, a leading advocate for Lost Canadians, who is giving evidence to the Senate committee this week, said, “I don’t want to leave any child behind.” 

But he expressed concern that amending the bill in the Senate may lead to it being held up when it returns to the Commons. …

Source: Senate urged to give children adopted from overseas the same citizenship rights as those born in Canada