Le choc, la charge, la charte | Vincent Marissal

A lengthy and thoughtful analysis of how the PQ got to this point and how central the proposed Charter is to its strategy. One of the best overviews I have seen:

Selon une source qui a assisté à des discussions à de très hauts niveaux au sein du gouvernement Marois, la suite du virage identitaire était déjà décidée: une fois majoritaire, le PQ adopte la Charte telle que présentée, sans clause dérogatoire. Elle sera contestée et battue par une cour fédérale, ce qui fournirait un puissant levier pour la souveraineté.

C’était le plan. La réalité, pour le moment, c’est que Pauline Marois doit se défendre tous les jours de vouloir organiser un troisième référendum, et la Charte a été reléguée à un tout petit rôle dans la présente campagne.

Le choc, la charge, la charte | Vincent Marissal | Actualités.

PQ reaps the intolerance it sowed with values charter

Another bad week on identity politics in Quebec and the ugly side of the PQ election and Charter strategy, starting with Graeme Hamilton of the Post:

Following a question about France from Paul Arcand, a radio host on 98.5 FM, Mr. Fontecilla said France is “far from a model” for integrating immigrants. “I would like to point out to Mr. Drainville that the theme of secularism was appropriated by the French right and even the extreme right, [former president Nicolas] Sarkozy and [National Front leader] Marine Le Pen,” he said. He added later that he is surprised the PQ has focused on a charter of Quebec values that promotes a “closing in on ourselves” and “anti-Muslim reactions.”

The PQ’s all-out barrage against Québec Solidaire sounds like a party that doth protest too much. Consider that, in less than a week, two PQ candidates have been caught up in controversy for intolerant comments toward religious minorities.

Jean Carrière stepped down Thursday as a candidate in the Montreal riding of Lafontaine after an image he shared on Facebook declared “F— Islam,” and posts praising Ms. Le Pen, came to light.

Another PQ candidate, college philosophy professor Louise Mailloux, has been allowed to remain as the PQ candidate for Gouin despite declaring last week that she stands behind her writings declaring that kosher and halal food are part of a conspiracy to enrich rabbis and imams and fund religious wars. She also likened circumcision and baptism to rape.

Graeme Hamilton: PQ reaps the intolerance it sowed with values charter | National Post.

Bernie Farber in the Star piles on, correctly so on Marois’ refusal to dissociate herself with Mailloux:

Many in the Jewish community are stunned by these developments, even though they have heard Marois categorically state that the PQ is not an anti-Semitic party. Indeed, Marois told journalists last week that the PQ counts many friends among the Jewish community leadership. Sounds an awful lot like some of my best friends are …
This past weekend, in a dismal attempt at damage control, Mailloux offered her version of an apology. She said she never meant to “offend anyone” and apologized if she did. There was no contrition or acknowledgment that the “kosher tax” was in fact an anti-Semitic deception. Jewish groups quite rightly rejected her apology.
This latest trek down bigotry’s path, along with the discriminatory Charter of Quebec Values, is giving many in Quebec’s faith and ethnic communities a legitimate scare. It is time we hold politicians who make such absurd comments accountable. And it is more than time that we reject political leaders who embrace the path of ethnic and faith intolerance.

Parti Québécois candidate revives an anti-Semitic lie

Surprising the that blog post in question by Mailloux is still up:

Le poulet sacré

Signes religieux: Pauline Marois sur la défensive – and Other Charter Articles

Further to my earlier post (Question du voile: «On a plus urgent»), on the record of PQ ministers, and previous PQ governments favouring inclusion and openness on religious symbols (when PM Marois was education minister), fun to see lively debate in the Quebec legislature pointing out the contradictions with the approach in the charter.

And like so many politicians these days, she takes what I can only call the “stupid” approach of denying the shift, rather than being honest and having a discussion on why the change. Even if I don’t agree with the Charter, any good comms person or policy advisor to come up with a few talking points that would sound more credible than:

«Jamais, jamais, dans ce document (the 1988 policy document), nous ne parlons de signes ostensibles. Jamais, parce que, dans les faits, comme je suis très cohérente, ce n’était pas dans ce document, puisque dans la charte nous empêcherons qu’il y ait le port de signes religieux ostensibles, et cela va dans le sens du respect, de chacun et de tous et de toutes», a argué la première ministre.

The more the PQ speaks of coherence, the more incoherent it appears.

And the polls do not appear to show that the political gambit of the Charter has worked; the PLQ maintains a lead of 5 points over the PQ, which appears to have reached a plateau, and support for sovereignty is only 33 percent. Hearings on the Charter start mid-January for a period of two months, and we will see what impact they have.

Signes religieux: Pauline Marois sur la défensive | Martin Ouellet | Politique québécoise.

One of the Quebec nursing unions, La Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé du Québec (FIQ), surveyed its members showing 60 percent supported the charter. In contrast, most hospitals and other health associations have come out against the charter, given the large number of employees that would be affected, and the impact on operations that would occur.

La FIQ appuie la Charte des valeurs | Hugo Pilon-Larose | Santé

But a number of the larger unions that are members of the FIQ, particularly two in Montreal, have dissociated themselves from this endorsement of the Charter:

Charte de la laïcité: d’importants syndicats se dissocient de la FIQ | Hugo Pilon-Larose | Politique québécoise

Point chaud – Charte de la laïcité – Duceppe rejoint Parizeau et Bouchard

Gilles Duceppe, former leader of the Bloc québécois, opposed to the excessive reach of the proposed Charter, and favouring the Bouchard-Taylor approach of limiting strict application of secularism to officials  in position of authority.

Line of former sovereignists leaders Jacques Parizeau, Lucien Bouchard and Bernard Landry, but not the current position of the Bloc which supports the PQ government’s proposal:

Point chaud – Charte de la laïcité – Duceppe rejoint Parizeau et Bouchard | Le Devoir.

Une Charte des valeurs sans compromis

Consistent with all the PQ government signals to date. Given that elections will not take place this fall, unclear how this will play in the political calculations as economic issues will likely reassert themselves in the spring, when provincial (and federal) budgets are normally presented.

Will be interesting to follow the parliamentary hearings on the proposed Charter and whether this starts to shift the terms of debate.

And it appears the proposed Charter is silent on the question of the crucifix in the Assemblée nationale.

Will post link to the full text tomorrow.

Une Charte des valeurs sans compromis | Le Devoir.

Sondage Léger – L’appui à la Charte se solidifie

The latest poll. While the numbers are up for the Charter, not clear whether this will translate into a majority PQ government. And on real issues – economy, healthcare, and education – the government is not doing well.

Sondage Léger – L’appui à la Charte se solidifie | Le Devoir.

Lisée préférerait que les candidats à la mairie de Montréal taisent leur opinion sur la Charte | Le Devoir

Not a good sign when the Minister responsible for Montreal, Jean-François Lisée, wants the mayoral candidates and other Montreal politicians to be quiet on the proposed Charter. Likely this will only invite more comment, and draw further attention to opposition to the Charter. While it may play well in the hinterland, we will see the overall impact over the next month or so.

Lisée préférerait que les candidats à la mairie de Montréal taisent leur opinion sur la Charte | Le Devoir.

PQ unhappy its values charter has become an issue in Montreal mayoral election

Quebec government embraces Stephen Harper’s approach to governance: Hébert | Toronto Star

A good post by Chantal Hébert, in The Toronto Star, picking up on how the bad habits and practices of the Conservative government have been picked up by Ontario, BC, and now QC governments. A government version of Gresham’s Law (“bad money drives out good”). Some of the same themes as in my book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism.

Quebec government embraces Stephen Harper’s approach to governance: Hébert | Toronto Star.

Quebec minister in hot seat over charter of values – Montreal – CBC News

Missed this debate between the Minister in charge of selling the Charter, and the philosopher and academic, Gérard Bouchard, who actually has thought considerably about these issues during his long career and his work on the Bouchard-Taylor commission. Quote:

“We took a meticulous look at the practice of accommodations and concluded it was going well,” he said. “You launched yourself into this operation in ignorance of the reality.”

Bouchard repeatedly asked Drainville what studies the government had done to determine that there was a need to restrict its employees’ religious freedoms.

Drainville replied that he had heard from “representatives of teachers, school boards, people working in the health sector” and other employers who didn’t know how to deal with their workers’ requests for religious accommodations and who implored the province to bring in limits.

Quebec minister in hot seat over charter of values – Montreal – CBC News.

In other words, anecdote, not evidence.

And naturally enough, the “battle” of the demonstrations starts (smaller than the one the previous week protesting the Charter):

Manifestation en faveur de la Charte des valeurs à Montréal

And a nuanced analysis of what makes Muslim Canadians wear the hijab, noting the wide variety of practices and beliefs within the community, and that wearing a hijab does not mean that it has been forced by male relatives. Quote:

D’une génération à l’autre, l’islam est souvent vécu de façon différente. « Certaines femmes [plus âgées] ont porté le voile par tradition. Les jeunes sont beaucoup plus dans une recherche spirituelle. On s’approprie la religion et on en fait quelque chose d’individuel. »

Port du voile – Les motifs derrière les apparences

Charte des valeurs: quatre visions s’affrontent | Denis Lessard | National

A good analysis of the various social/demographic groups and how they are positioned with the proposed Charter:

  • Pure laine Catholics (29%)
  • The tolerant believer (29%)
  • The open laic (21%)
  • The closed laic (21 %)

Charte des valeurs: quatre visions s’affrontent | Denis Lessard | National.

In terms of the PQ plans, appears some of the signals yesterday by Jean-François Lisée, PQ Minister for Montreal, were false as the government appears to be digging in its heels:

Parti Québécois: No quick compromises on values plan

Charte des valeurs québécoises – Signes religieux : le droit de retrait pourrait être restreint, dit Lisée

Lastly, a stronger legal analysis of Canadian jurisprudence on the proposed Charter by Daniel Proulx of Université de Sherbrooke, citing recent Supreme Court jurisprudence on conditions where the niqab can be worn in court. His rebuttal to the Henri Blum opinion (Charte des valeurs québécoises – Au sujet de la validité constitutionnelle):

La réplique › Charte des valeurs québécoises – Une Charte qui ne passerait pas le test