Working site on citizenship and multiculturalism issues.
2023/08/05 Leave a comment
Good commentary on a significant study (Le sentiment d’appartenance des immigrants au Québec s’effrite par rapport au Canada):
When then-premier Pauline Marois unveiled her sovereigntist Parti Québécois government’s proposed Charter of Quebec Values in 2013, she got an earful from an unlikely critic.
…
Source: Bill 21 has made immigrants in Quebec grow even more attached to Canada
2023/08/05 Leave a comment
Not surprising that he ducked the levels question as he would be tarred as xenophobic. But his relentless focus on housing, and the increased discussion on the link between high levels of immigration and housing availability and affordability, are increasingly untenable.
Suspect if he had the political courage to advocate for a pause at current levels to allow housing and healthcare to start catching up (or not falling further behind), he might gain some political support in both immigrant and non-immigrant communities.
But I’m not a political strategist!
Canada’s immigration system is broken, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre charged Tuesday, as he sidestepped questions about whether he would change current targets.
Appearing before reporters on Parliament Hill, Poilievre criticized Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent comments on housing and pledged to speed up entry for immigrants skilled in the building trades.
The federal government has set a target of welcoming 500,000 immigrants per year by 2025, although some worry about the pressure that could add to the country’s housing crisis, driven by what experts agree is a supply shortage.
Ottawa has defended its ambitious target as necessary given the labour shortage and thousands of job vacancies that employers continue to experience since the COVID-19 pandemic, which triggered widespread lockdowns.
Poilievre slammed the Liberal target as driven by Trudeau’s “ideology,” but he did not answer repeated questions about whether he would consider reducing the number.
He said a Conservative government would base its immigration policy on the needs of private-sector employers, the degree to which charities plan to support refugees and the desire for family reunification.
“I’ll make sure we have housing and health care so that when people come here they have a roof overhead and care when they need it,” he said Tuesday.
“I’ll make sure that it’s easier for employers to fill genuine job vacancies they cannot fill.”
Statistics Canada reported last month the country is facing a little more than 781,000 job vacancies.
Poilievre’s comments come as the Conservatives try to increase their support in newcomer communities in some of the country’s largest cities and suburbs, selling the party as pro-immigration.
The Tories have struggled to rebuild such support since losing government in 2015, when they campaigned on a pledge to set up a tip line for so-called “barbaric cultural practices.”
A review of the party’s 2021 election loss called for recruitment of more diverse candidates and better outreach to cultural communities.
Besides appearing at numerous ethnic media roundtables, attending different cultural events and meeting with various business groups, Poilievre has championed cost-of-living issues in his outreach, from a lack of affordable housing to high food prices.
Rather than discussing immigration targets, the Conservative leader has focused on the system’s shortcomings.
His opponents, however, have been carefully watching his position. The federal NDP attacked Poilievre back in May for supporting a Bloc Québécois motion that condemned the government’s immigration goals for not properly considering their impact on the French language in Quebec, as well as housing, schools and health-care.
In his outreach, Poilievre has also honed in on concerns about the number of international students to die by suicide since the pandemic, with more relying on food banks.
He has promised to speed up licensing processes for doctors and nurses who come to Canada, saying Tuesday the Conservatives would ensure “that immigrants who come here as professionals get a chance to work in their profession.”
He also took aim at new Housing Minister Sean Fraser, who served in the immigration portfolio before the recent cabinet shuffle.
Calling Fraser “the worst immigration minister in Canadian history,” Poilievre blamed him and Trudeau for refugee claimants sleeping on Toronto’s streets due to a lack of spaces in the city’s shelter system.
The federal government recently announced it would give the city almost $100 million to help find housing.
Source: Poilievre says Canada’s immigration system is broken, sidesteps target cut questions
2023/08/05 Leave a comment
Bit of a rant with some valid critiques of both major political parties and the institutions and people that support them:
When Canada’s population hit the 40 million mark earlier this summer, it was celebrated as a milestoneand a “signal that Canada remains a dynamic and welcoming country”, in the words of the country’s chief statistician. The Washington Post, among other foreign observers, cited this as evidence that “Canada is booming like it never has before”. It failed to mention, however, the recent closure of Roxham Road on the New York-Quebec border, an entry point for many thousands of irregular refugee border crossings since 2017.
These two policies — the population-growth plan and the border-crossing closure — may seem antithetical, but they are very much related. Together, they illustrate Ottawa’s distinctive approach to immigration. Notwithstanding the progressive rhetoric of its leaders, Canada has actually been quite proactive at restricting most uncontrolled migration through its “bureaucratic wall”, while ensuring through a highly selective strategy (which includes the lauded “points system”) that the majority of the newcomers who do arrive through controlled channels are, relatively speaking, well-off, well-educated and hailing from middle-class backgrounds.
In this way, Canada has been able to scoop up “the best and the brightest” from all over the world, which explains why immigration has historically always been a popular policy. In fact, this arrangement has been so politically stable that a viable anti-immigration party has yet to emerge at the national level, bucking the trend in other Western democracies.
Yet there are reasons to believe that a reckoning is in store — though not because Canadians’ cultural attitudes to immigrants have soured, as has happened in most European nations. Indeed, they are more likely to think of surgeons rather than Salafists when they look at who’s coming through their migration streams. If a countermovement against the status quo is to come, it will stem from a single factor: there will be nowhere for newcomers to live.
This may sound like a strange thing to say for the world’s second largest country by landmass, but most Canadians live in a handful of cities and, amid a global housing crisis, Canada ranks as among the absolute worst nations in the developed world for affordability. It has the highest household debt and, astonishingly, the lowest number of housing units per 1,000 people in the G7. Needless to say, the housing bubble has greatly reduced Canadians’ quality of life and made already pricey metropolises such as Toronto and Vancouver impossible to live in for those who are not already solidly affluent. And it shows: homelessness has exploded and sprawling tent cities are now a distressingly common sight. With circumstances as dire as this, how did policymakers in Ottawa figure it would be a good idea to welcome 1.5 million new residents by 2025?
A big part of the answer is that it’s all going according to plan. For the main overriding (if unsayable) goal of Canadian policymaking across all levels of government is to do everything possible to boost real estate values and rental prices rapidly and radically for the benefit of established homeowners and investors — and to the detriment of everyone else.
This cleavage, a primarily economic rather than a cultural or identitarian one, pits older home-owning Canadians from the Boomer and Gen X cohorts against struggling Millennials and Gen Zs; landlords against renters; long-settled immigrants against those fresh-off-the-boat: in other words, the insiders against the outsiders.
And it is clear where the loyalties of Canada’s political classes lay. The Nimby orthodoxy favoured by the insiders is evident in everything from steep development charges baked into municipal regulations — which make the cost of building houses prohibitive — to lazy, sticking-plaster solutions such as rent relief schemes, which simply funnel money into landlords’ pockets while doing nothing to address the underlying problems of housing undersupply. Once viewed in relation to this out-in-the-open conspiracy — the Great Canadian Racket — the government’s immigration targets, as well as its student visa policy, start to make sense.
For this purpose, Canada specifically wants prospective immigrants who are financially endowed, not penniless refugees; and it is able to draw in those candidates through its selective policy controls, whether they’re coming in as immigrants or as international students with enough funds to cover exorbitant rents and tuition fees.
The plight of international students is particularly tragic. Bright-eyed applicants to Canadian institutions from India and elsewhere are lured in with promises of a first-world education, only to be suckered into overpriced degrees while being cooped into horrendous housing conditions and forced to compete for menial gig work. Though Canada is not alone in experiencing this kind of steady glut of foreign entrants to its universities, it’s been conspicuous in its refusal to consider the extent of the exploitation involved — unlike in Britain, for instance, where authorities seem at least to have acknowledged the issue. While Canada has set about poaching high-skilled foreign workers from the US, a Toronto international student was found living under a bridge. Ottawa’s response to this and other horror stories seems to be: come on in!
This careless approach of importing boatloads of wealth-bearing immigrants to juice up the economic growth numbers, driving up rents for everyone and lowering the cost of labour, has been referred to by one housing policy commentator as “human quantitative easing”, an appropriately Orwellian-sounding name. Canada’s embrace of it has led to a perverse contradiction whereby its official monetary policy — namely, successive rate hikes to tame inflation (meaning increasingly costly mortgage payments for new homeowners) — is being offset by its unofficial “Human QE” policy, which, of course, exerts an inflationary effect.
If there is one ray of hope, it is that the immigrants and students themselves are beginning to rise up. Because of the genteel, middle-class character of many of these newcomers, they often have amour-propre — a keen sense of one’s own worth. The words of a Punjabi architect who decided to move back home are emblematic: “I respect myself too much to stay [in Canada].”
The ruling Liberals have all but abdicated moral responsibility on the issue, with Trudeau going from lofty rhetoric about “housing is a human right” to declaring that “housing isn’t a primary federal responsibility”. And though carrying a kernel of truth at an abstract, technical level, his words nonetheless struck many as offensively tone-deaf. After all, Trudeau’s willingness to confront the provinces on issues such as carbon pricing merely highlights his studied indifference on housing.
This negligent stance is reinforced by members of the government caucus, such as ex-housing minister, Ahmed Hussen, who recently insisted that housing “is not a political issue” after purchasing his second rental unit; and Vancouver MP Taleeb Noormohamed, who made millions buying and flipping houses. In any event, the Trudeau Liberals are cruising towards a well-earned defeat at the polls.
The bad news for Canadians is that the alternative, the Conservative Party of Pierre Poilievre, is no better. Much like Hussen and Noormohamed, Poilievre is a card-carrying member of the investor-rentier oligarchy (private investment is, of course, key to funding more construction but this class has gone about it in all the wrong ways, presiding over the hyper-financialisation of new and existing supply). The Conservative “plan” is apparently based on pushing cities to build more homes with carrots and sticks; and though phrased in colourful populist language (“Fire the gatekeepers!”), it is essentially a weak mirror image of Trudeau’s feckless initiatives. Poilievre’s bluster about fining cities that fail to comply — which Ottawa may not even have the power to do — would almost certainly just result in municipalities retaliating by jacking up fees and charges even more to pay the new fines.
Furthermore, Poilievre shows no sign of breaking with the status quo on immigration, refusing to contradictTrudeau’s immigration targets. There are two possible reasons for this, both of which could be true. The first is that Poilievre fears being tarred as “Trump North” and doesn’t want to risk losing the Conservatives’ long-cultivated relationship with multicultural communities (the subject of an admiring 2014 essayby Rishi Sunak) — even though the young people in those same communities are suffering just as much from housing scarcity and would greatly benefit from a slowdown in the rate of new arrivals. The second is that Poilievre is an anti-statist libertarian who worships at the altar of Milton Friedman, the US monetarist who helped make the case for immigration maximalism, when he argued it would supercharge growth and kill the welfare state. It could just be that Poilievre genuinely believes, on ideological grounds, that such heedless immigration targets are a good idea.
Canada faces a perfect storm: a population bomb and a housing crunch, both the consciously engineered products of national policy. Staving off disaster will require heroic leadership to chart needed course corrections on housing, immigration and student visas, while acknowledging the hard political trade-offs that need to happen: the insiders must incorporate the interests and demands of the outsiders, or trigger a complete social breakdown. In the past, Canada’s storied Laurentian elite excelled at this kind of astute brokerage politics and built a nation with it, but their courage and vision have now given way to the reign of cowardice and mediocrity.
2023/08/05 Leave a comment
Taking some of the government’s arguments in favour of self-administered oaths of citizenship and increased reliance on virtual ceremonies (except for those with Minister Miller!) to the extreme, Meggs argues that “If that’s how little we value citizenship, why do we make it so difficult to achieve?” why not move to complete “self-check-out” and provide voting rights to permanent residents at the municipal level, along with an integrated Permanent Residents to Citizenship process.
IMO, Meggs is to quick to state that political parties ignore the concerns of Permanent Residents, given that many have relatives and friends who are citizens, and that most Permanent Residents will become citizens:
Canada has been pretty clear about the benefits we expect from the nearly 500,000 immigrants now arriving annually, especially the wealth and economic growth we need them to generate.
But what’s in it for them?
Unless the pathway to citizenship speeds up dramatically, Canada will soon be home to millions of permanent residents who work, pay taxes, can even serve in Canada’s Armed Forces, but are prohibited from voting or running for office.
Those are in addition to the nearly one million Canadian residents in temporary work or study programs, more than 70 percent of whom aspire to stay.
The Discover Canada booklet, available to all would-be immigrants hoping to become Canadian, describes our country as a place guided by “a belief in ordered liberty, enterprise, hard work and fair play.”
What’s fair about taxation without representation?
Canada’s history provides ample evidence that those denied the vote – whether women, Japanese Canadians, Chinese Canadians, Indigenous or any other group – are also denied basic rights and subject to exploitation and discrimination.
A recent Abacus poll showed that Canadians remain generally enthusiastic about immigration, yet increasingly uneasy about the pressure on already-strained services like housing, education and health care. (Of course, both education and health care would collapse without foreign students’ fees and immigrant health workers’ skills.)
Those most affected by those shortfalls are immigrants themselves, confronted by constant economic and social hardship as they seek to put down roots.
Nonetheless, they prevail. The 2021 census showed that immigrants – people who were born elsewhere, immigrated to Canada and became citizens – already make up nearly one quarter of the electorate.
That share would be even higher if the 60 percent of “non-citizens” in the census tally, mostly people of working age and almost all engaged in the workforce, could vote. A large proportion of this group are young people who should have a right to participate in decisions that will affect them for the rest of their lives.
In cities like Toronto, Montreal and Metro Vancouver, where the majority of newcomers seek to settle, those hundreds of thousands of new voters could reshape the political landscape. Until they join the electorate, their concerns are of no interest to campaigning politicians.
As things stand, permanent residents wait a minimum of three years before becoming eligible to apply for citizenship, often after years of effort to achieve permanent resident status.
To be fair, Canada has had some limited success in reducing wait times to achieve citizenship, moving the citizenship test online and even allowing successful applicants to self-administer the oath. (Unfortunately, Queen Elizabeth II remains our sovereign, according to Discover Canada’s downloadable study guide, a potential pitfall to applicants trying the multiple-choice and true/false online test.)
These efficiencies undermine the gravity and responsibility of achieving Canadian citizenship even as they seek to streamline the process. The once momentous milestone of citizenship is reduced to something akin to self-checkout.
If that’s how little we value citizenship, why do we make it so difficult to achieve?
Why not combine the permanent resident and citizenship process into one, reserving the right to revoke citizenship within a given time frame if certain criteria aren’t met?
In the meantime, provinces should allow permanent residents to vote at the municipal level, as cities like Vancouver, Toronto, Calgary and Hamilton have all proposed in recent years.
The cost of inaction is well captured in the painful past experience of Japanese Canadians.
In October 1900, naturalized citizen Tomeikichi Homma marched into the Vancouver Court House and demanded to be registered to vote. The elections officer, relying on racist provincial election rules, said he would go to jail before he registered “a Jap.”
Homma’s challenge was upheld by two BC courts before finally being overturned at the Privy Council in London, then the British empire’s highest court. It would be nearly 50 years before Japanese Canadians got the vote, after suffering through the forced dislocation and internment of the Second World War.
In his judgement upholding Homma’s right to register, BC Judge Angus McColl warned:
“The residence within the province of large numbers of persons, British subjects in name, but doomed to perpetual exclusion from any part in the passage of legislation affecting their property and civil rights, would surely not be to the advantage of Canada, and might even become a source of national danger.”
His warning applies equally to Canada today. Yes, Canada’s permanent residents will get to vote, eventually. We should make that wait as short as possible.
. . .
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Geoff Meggs – Geoff is a Canadian politician, political operative and communications expert, who served on Vancouver, British Columbia’s City Council from 2008 to 2017. He was first elected in the 2008 municipal election, and resigned his seat on city council in 2017 to accept a job as chief of staff to John Horgan, the Premier of British Columbia. Prior to his election to City Council in 2017, Geoff served as Executive Director for the BC Federation of Labour.
Source: Meggs: Immigration and the Vote
2023/08/04 Leave a comment
Of note, continuing weaponizing of citizenship:
Ukrainians living in Russian-occupied territory are being forced to assume Russian citizenship or face retaliation, including possible deportation or detention, a new US report has said.
Yale University researchers found that residents of the Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions were being targeted by a systematic effort to strip them of Ukrainian identity.
Ukrainians who do not seek Russian citizenship “are subjected to threats, intimidation, restrictions on humanitarian aid and basic necessities, and possible detention or deportation, all designed to force them to become Russian citizens,” the report said.
Russia’s actions were “classic war crimes in the sense that they are restricting or limiting through this process people’s ability to access critical services and resources that Russia is required to allow all people to access, such as healthcare, and humanitarian systems,” Nathaniel Raymond, the executive director of Yale School of Public Health, told CNN.
Moscow claims to have given Russian passports to more than 3 million Ukrainians since 2014, after the annexation of Crimea and occupation of Ukrainian territories since the launch of its full-scale invasion in 2022.
Russian prime minister Mikhail Mishustin said in May that Moscow had given passports to almost 1.5 million people living in parts of Ukraine’s Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions seized since October last year.
“This number has grown since then, with leaders of the so-called Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) claiming that three-quarters of residents of that oblast [region] had received Russian citizenship,” the report said.
Russian president Vladimir Putin has signed a series of decrees to compel Ukrainians to get Russian passports, in violation of international humanitarian law, the report said.
The report included a timeline of increasingly aggressive measures to pressure or force Ukrainians to become Russian citizens, starting in May 2014, when Russia illegally annexed Crimea. The timeline continues ahead to July 2024, when, according to new Russian laws, residents without Russian citizenship would be considered “foreigners” or “stateless” and can be detained in detention facilities and/or deported to Russia.
March 2014: Russia illegally annexes Crimea and passportisation begins.Nine months after annexation, Russia claims that over 1.5 million people in Crimea have received Russian citizenship.
February 2022: Russia’s full-scale invasion begins and Moscow captures parts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Three months later, citizenship application in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia is simplified. This follows the simplification of citizenship applications in Donetsk and Luhansk in 2019. In September 2022. Russia illegally annexes Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.
18 March 2023: Russia introduces a law on unilateral renunciation of Ukrainian citizenship introduced. The policy allows residents to “renounce” their Ukrainian citizenship unilaterally. Two days later, Putin calls for passportisation to be accelerated and local occupation authorities quickly announce new passporting offices and mobile teams.
27 April 2023: Russia adopts a law that will allow authorities to detain or deport residents without Russian passports. Starting July 2024, residents without Russian citizenship will be considered “foreigners” or “stateless”.
6 June 2023: Destruction of the Kakhovka dam, resulting in widespread flooding and displacement. Russia’s forces use the aftermath to push citizenship on residents. Russian passport holders are made eligible for compensation for the flood damage, whereas Ukrainian passport holders are eligible only for only a small flat payment.
26 June 2023: Planning begins for deportation and detention facilities. The head of the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic” announces a planning group to study facilities for detaining residents without Russian passports for deportation.
1 July 2024: Ukrainian residents who have not accepted Russian citizenship can be detained and/or deported, including to remote areas of Russia.
The report said: “While states are afforded wide discretion under international law with regards to conferring nationality, customary international law clearly forbids the imposition of citizenship without consent or under duress.”
Source: Russia ‘systematically’ forcing Ukrainians to accept citizenship, US report finds
2023/08/04 Leave a comment
Of note. Wonder what the data says about separations by the various equity groups and disaggregated groups for IRCC (overall government data indicate lower for visible minorities, particularly for Black public servants How well is the government meeting its diversity targets? An intersectionality analysis):
Multiple employees at the federal government’s Immigration Department said they were subject to racist micro-aggressions, harassment and professional marginalization during postings in its offices abroad, according to a survey commissioned by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
Staff cited management making fun of their accents, and group leaders expressing “overt disdain and even hatred for people from certain countries and for immigrants to Canada in general, using racial slurs and stating support for violence against people from other countries,” according to a summary of the survey’s findings published by the department.
“Being a black person here is an extreme sport. I kid you not. We are not protected,” one employee is quoted saying in the document.
Another employee expressed the opinion that long, overseas postings have enabled a level of comfort for leaders to express racist thoughts.
“The space enables it. It’s like seeing a shocking example from a training happening right in front of you. Expressed by an older white man.”
Employees are unnamed in the survey for confidentiality reasons. Pollara Strategic Insights was hired to conduct the work, and it interviewed 62 staff members.
Some progress in last two years
Pollara conducted a similar survey in 2021. Back then, multiple employees described supervisors and colleagues using offensive terms with racialized staff, who, they said, were also getting passed over for international postings and other professional development opportunities.
The more current survey noted some progress and behavioural shifts in the last two years, but not at the IRCC’s foreign posting locations.
“There has been a shift in acknowledgement that there is a problem. And now we have data showing there is a problem,” one employee said.
The survey noted a number of staff found the IRCC to be a better workplace than other federal departments where they have worked, “both in terms of its internal diversity (at least at lower echelons of the organization) and in terms of its commitment to tackle racism head on.”
Pollara also found employees saw a slight increase in the number of racialized staff getting hired or promoted, and praised “an increase in opportunities for employees to share their experiences with peers and allies through multiple working groups.”
However, asked to rate on a scale of 1 to 10 how much of a problem racism was at the IRCC, some 63 per cent of the surveyed employees gave it a 7 or higher.
Participants also asked for the creation of an independent office to report racism-related complaints, suggesting the department should have an ombudsman.
IRCC union not consulted
The Canada Employment and Immigration Union, which represents IRCC employees, said it was surprised by the existence of the report.
“We’ve been raising the red flag for years about the systemic racism issues at the IRCC,” said the union’s national executive vice-president Crystal Warner.
“We’re a bit frustrated to learn at the last minute again that something has been done on this front and that the unions were not consulted.”
She said it is not surprising employees would be asking for an ombudsman’s office. “This is a department with some of the worst staffing violations with nepotism and the way they hire people,” she said.
The union launched a policy grievance about systemic racism with the IRCC last year.
Source: Immigration Canada staff in postings abroad mocked, harassed by managers: employee survey
2023/08/04 Leave a comment
The independentiste take:
Le 25 mars dernier, lors de la fermeture du chemin Roxham, le premier ministre Legault était triomphant : nous cesserions d’être submergés par un flux incontrôlable de demandeurs d’asile. Nous apprenons maintenant que cela n’a nullement été le cas. Le flux est aussi imposant qu’avant.
Il y a quelques jours, nous apprenions que six jeunes hockeyeurs ukrainiens qui ont été acclamés au tournoi annuel de hockey pee-wee de Québec l’hiver dernier revenaient à Québec pour y étudier. Oh, surprise !, ils viennent étudier à l’école secondaire « publique » de langue anglaise St Patrick’s de Québec.
Ces enfants ne satisfont pas aux critères généraux d’admissibilité aux écoles publiques anglophones du Québec, leurs parents n’ayant pas la citoyenneté canadienne et leurs frères et soeurs n’ayant jamais reçu la majeure partie de leur enseignement primaire en anglais au Canada.
De plus, cinq des six joueurs ne sont pas, non plus, à la charge d’une personne qui séjourne temporairement au Québec. Reste une dernière possibilité de se qualifier pour être admissibles à l’enseignement en anglais dans une école secondaire publique du Québec : être admis en raison d’une situation particulière.
Venir d’un pays agressé par une puissance nucléaire constitue une situation particulière, c’est incontestable, tout comme peut l’être le fait de venir d’un pays soumis à une dictature ou d’un pays éprouvé par des cataclysmes naturels (incendies de forêt, tremblement de terre, hausse du niveau des mers, inondations, typhons, tempêtes tropicales, sécheresse, etc.), par des persécutions, des guerres civiles, une inflation galopante, une banqueroute nationale et le reste.
Tous ces gens possiblement admissibles ont potentiellement plus de chances de s’inscrire dans les écoles primaires et secondaires publiques anglophones du Québec que les « Québécois francophones de souche » eux-mêmes. Nous sommes dans l’absurdité absolue.Improvisation
Nous nageons, en matière d’immigration au Canada (et conséquemment, au Québec), dans l’improvisation et l’arbitraire les plus complets. S’ajoute à cela la décision du Canada anglais et de son gouvernement national de passer de 40 à 100 millions d’habitants au Canada d’ici 75 ans ; cela, sans qu’à aucun moment ne soit prise en considération l’incidence qu’une telle politique est susceptible d’avoir sur ce qui fut longtemps (jusque vers 1835) la majorité du Canada, la « nation » québécoise (officiellement reconnue comme telle par le Parlement canadien).
Face à tout cela, François Legault et la CAQ optent pour la politique de l’autruche. Les victoires sur papier sont célébrées, mais l’évidence du cul-de-sac dans lequel nous nous trouvons comme population francophone en Amérique ne les incite aucunement à remettre en question le cadre constitutionnel qui nous condamne à l’assimilation du fait :
1- De l’absence totale de prise sur les migrations interprovinciales ;
2- De l’omniprésence d’établissements primaires et secondaires anglophones à travers le territoire du Québec ;
3- De la marginalisation accélérée de la population francophone et du Québec à l’intérieur du Canada.
Tout homme d’État responsable ferait tout pour que la seule et unique voie de sortie, soit celle de la souveraineté, soit examinée avec sérieux. Or, le premier ministre Legault et son parti sont chaque jour plus fédéralistes et plus antisouverainistes.
Depuis sa fondation, la CAQ n’a jamais eu d’objectif plus évident que de tuer le mouvement souverainiste en se prétendant « nationaliste » tout en étant secrètement aussi fédéraliste que le Parti libéral du Québec. Sans la fondation de ce parti, Pauline Marois aurait, selon toute vraisemblance, eu droit à un premier mandat majoritaire et à un deuxième mandat, au moins minoritaire.
Un vrai parti québécois fédéraliste et nationaliste (ce que fut l’Union nationale de Maurice Duplessis) doit, au minimum, veiller à ce que le poids démographique du Québec ne chute pas à l’intérieur du Canada. Or, la CAQ opte à la fois pour l’extinction du mouvement souverainiste et pour la réduction voulue et planifiée du poids du Québec à l’intérieur de l’ensemble canadien. Cela est tout simplement suicidaire.
Face à l’histoire, François Legault et la CAQ porteront une immense responsabilité advenant notre transformation en simple groupe ethnique assimilé parmi d’autres. En sont-ils conscients ?
2023/08/04 Leave a comment
Understandable. But similarly need to be mindful of counterproductive approaches as this case illustrates:
A coalition of Black community organizations in Ontario is expressing concern that a government review of the circumstances that led to the death of a former Toronto District School Board principal will put anti-racism and equity measures under unfair scrutiny.
Speaking in front of the provincial legislature in Queen’s Park on Wednesday, representatives of the organizations said the death of the principal, Richard Bilkszto, is being used to dismantle these diversity measures at school boards and to discredit Kike Ojo-Thompson, an anti-racism trainer who led a workshop the former principal attended two years ago.
Mr. Bilkszto retired from the school board in 2019 after more than two decades in education, but continued to work on a contract basis. His lawyer, Lisa Bildy, has said he died in July by suicide. He had filed a lawsuit against the school board, alleging it had failed to protect him after a confrontation with Ms. Ojo-Thompson during the workshop.
Ontario Education Minister Stephen Lecce characterized Mr. Bilkszto’s allegations as “serious and disturbing” in a statement last month. He said that his government would review the circumstances that led to the educator’s death.
It is not clear if the workshop played any role in the death. Even so, the incident has galvanized right-wing commentators, who have been critical of equity, diversity, and inclusion training at school boards. The government has said it will investigate what happened during the workshop as part of its probe.
The group outside the Ontario legislature on Wednesday called for transparency in the government’s review.
“Any attempt to remove or restrict anti-racism education in this province will have severe and detrimental consequences perpetuating inequities and hindering the progress we have collectively made in fostering an inclusive and compassionate learning environment,” Amanuel Melles, executive director of the Network for the Advancement of Black Communities, told reporters.
“Any attempt to remove and restrict anti-racism education in this province, based on the death of one individual, is an intentional appropriation of the death for political gains,” he added. “This will not happen under our watch.”
Idris Orughu, a community organizer, told reporters there is an “active campaign to villainize and undermine anti-racism work in this province.”
The organizations are calling for the province to meet with them, reaffirm its commitment to anti-racism work and “denounce the scapegoating” of the trainer and her consulting firm, which is called the KOJO Institute.
In a statement on Wednesday, Grace Lee, a spokesperson for Mr. Lecce, said that while the review “into these disturbing allegations will occur, we remain firm that professional anti-racism and anti-discrimination training will continue.”
Before his death, Mr. Bilkszto was outspoken about diversity and equity issues. Last year, his name appeared on the conference agenda for New Blue, a newly created right-wing political party in Ontario. He was scheduled to speak on critical race theory in schools.
In his lawsuit, Mr. Bilkszto alleged that Ms. Ojo-Thompson “implicitly referred” to him as a racist and a white supremacist during the workshop, which was a professional-development course for administrators. Mr. Bilkszto alleged that senior school staff did not stop the harassment. He said this was contrary to the school board’s policy of protecting the well-being and safety of its employees.
None of the allegations have been proven in court.
A statement of claim provided by Mr. Bilkszto’s lawyer said that, during a session, Mr. Bilkszto expressed an opinion that challenged a claim by Ms. Ojo-Thompson that Canada was more racist than the United States and had “never reckoned with its anti-Black history.”
Mr. Bilkszto, who had previously taught in Buffalo, N.Y., disagreed and referred to Canada’s education and health care system. He said it would have been an “incredible disservice to our learners” to suggest Canada lagged the U.S. in this way.
In a session the following week, Ms. Ojo-Thompson emphasized the previous interaction with Mr. Bilkszto “as being a ‘real-life’ example of ‘resistance’ in support of white supremacy,” the statement of claim said.
Mr. Bilkszto said he was berated in front of his peers and felt humiliated, according to the claim.
In May, 2021, Mr. Bilkszto filed a mental stress injury claim with the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board over the training. The WSIB decision, which was provided to The Globe and Mail by his lawyer, was in his favour. He was awarded almost two months of lost earnings in a ruling that described Ms. Ojo-Thompson’s behaviour during the training sessions as “abusive, egregious and vexatious.”
His lawyer, Ms. Bildy, said in a statement that the incidents caused her client “severe mental distress” and that he “succumbed to this distress.”
In a statement on the KOJO Institute’s website last week, Ms. Ojo-Thompson said her company would co-operate with the government review. She said allegations made by Mr. Bilkszto were false. The incident, she said, is “being weaponized to discredit” anti-racism work.
2023/08/04 Leave a comment
Another good commentary on the need for ceremonies. New immigration minister Miller likes attending ceremonies so perhaps he can ensure that most new Canadians can as well:
Last week, the federal cabinet had a major shuffle.
The new ministers and the re-positioned ministers did not “self-administer” their oaths and declarations. They were not sitting by themselves in their living rooms with no one watching when they assumed their new roles.
On the contrary, they were expected to attend a ceremony.
The ritual, the formality and the gravity of the event at Rideau Hall – steeped in symbolism – signalled to the ministers and to everyone that ministerial appointments are important.
Well, becoming a Canadian citizen is very important. Canada is important.
Becoming a Canadian citizen merits a ceremony in most cases, not just in occasional cases by request.
The government of Canada is wrong to push self-administered, on-line oaths with no ceremony of any kind.
This policy was recently announced in the Canada Gazette, the official record of federal government notices and decisions.
Inspirational Canadian
In 2018, I came across the obituary of Kamal Akbarali. I was sad to see it. I had met Judge Akbarali several times as a high-school student in the 1990s.
Kamal Akbarali was a citizenship judge, and he performed the role very well. He was also an inspirational Canadian. He loved this country.
My fellow students and I had the pleasure of attending a few public citizenship ceremonies at which Judge Akbarali presided. We were the “audience.” We were there to welcome and acknowledge the new Canadians, our soon-to-be-fellow citizens. Some of them were our peers from school.
Judge Akbarali made an impression on me.
I remember being moved by what he said about his own journey. It sounded like the stories of my own grandparents, who found freedom and possibilities and affirmation in Canada.
Judge Akbarali came to Canada from Pakistan in 1965. At the ceremonies, he talked about how he got started in this country. He took on a career in finance and started a family.
Judge Akbarali talked about the plight of refugees, about democracy, about peace, about service to others, about respect for Indigenous Canadians and people from all over the world.
In other words, he talked about Canada and aspirations for Canada.
Although full of gratitude, he did not insist the country was perfect. In his view, a good citizen is compassionate, sometimes critical and always constructive.
As Judge Akbarali spoke, I could almost feel the beautiful vastness and diversity of the country. I felt hopeful and motivated.
After each ceremony, a beautiful cake would be rolled out so that we could celebrate our fellow Canadians. The new citizens had just gone through a life-changing, emotional event.
Bureaucratic efficiency?
The stated rationale for the move toward self-administered oaths is administrative efficiency – easing the backlog by “three months of processing time.” (The change, however, is slated to be permanent.)
There is essentially no acknowledgment of the value of civic symbolism, public celebration and instilling a sense of community by the act of officially gathering.
To clear backlogs, additional part-time officiants – respected citizens — could be brought on by Ottawa. They could help with processing. They could preside at ceremonies by request. (Nova Scotia recently did this with a successful recruitment push for part-time administrative justices of the peace for civil weddings. I happen to be one of them.)
What can we do now?
I believe this is a case where a personally addressed note, in your own words, to your member of parliament could have some impact.
A petition
Also, please check out the excellent petition by Andrew Griffith, a former senior public servant in the federal Department of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.
You can sign it electronically on the website of the House of Commons. It is labelled as petition e-4511.
The petition calls on the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship to “abandon plans to permit self-administration of the citizenship oath.”
The petition also urges Ottawa to “revert to in-person ceremonies as the default, with virtual ceremonies limited to 10 per cent of all ceremonies.”
Griffith believes backlogs can be addressed by other efficiencies and by holding more ceremonies on evenings and weekends.
I concur. I hope the minister listens.
The minister’s name is Marc Miller, and he assumed his current role in a ceremony – the same one that was held at Rideau Hall last week.
Dr. Tom Urbaniak, professor of political science and director of the Tompkins Institute at Cape Breton University, is the author of six books. The most recent is “In the Public Square: A Citizen’s Reader.”
Source: URBANIAK: Becoming a Canadian citizen should require a ceremony
2023/08/03 Leave a comment
The chart below breaks down the 1,341 signatures as of 1 August by province. While Ontario remains over-represented, this is gradually becoming less so. Quebec overtook Alberta this week and, if current trends continue, will approach or surpass British Columbia, thanks to my friend and partner on this petition, Richard Babczak.
And if you haven’t yet considered signing the petition, the link is here: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4511
Click image for book purchase
Multicultural Meanderings 