Gee: Trump’s war on migrants has echoes of Australia’s past

Interesting comparison:

…In both cases – 18th-century England, 21st-century America – the aim is to demonize, dehumanize and finally to expel these agents of disorder. The Trump administration deports migrants to Honduras, El Salvador and Africa. England’s rulers dispatched prisoners to Australia.

As Mr. Hughes puts it, transportation was an attempt to uproot “an enemy class from the British social fabric.” Sending the convicts away “conveyed evil to another world.” 

But it never worked. England’s crime wave rolled on. The early 19th-century was a time of protest and upheaval. Nor did the exiled convicts prove to be the irredeemable human detritus they were often said to be. 

Many earned their freedom – their “ticket of leave” – for hard work and good behaviour. Together with the free settlers who began arriving in time, they and their children built thriving colonies in this vast and distant continent. Out of those colonies sprang a thriving, stubbornly democratic nation: Australia.

Source: Trump’s war on migrants has echoes of Australia’s past

Immigration minister wants department to track exits of temporary residents

Long overdue:

Immigration Minister Lena Diab says she wants her department to acquire the ability to track the number of people with temporary visas who are exiting the country.

The immigration department confirms almost 1.9 million temporary visas, including work and study permits, are expiring this year. More than 2.1 million expired last year.

Diab said the Canada Border Services Agency and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada are able to track some information about specific people and groups, but there’s no simple way to track how many temporary residents are leaving Canada.

Diab said she’d like to change that with the help of digital tools.

“There’s a number countries around the world that do track those. And I believe we need to also be doing that,” Diab said in a phone interview with The Canadian Press.

“Did we have the capabilities to do that before? No. Should we? I think yes, and that is something that you will see us working toward.”

Aaron McCrorie, CBSA vice president of intelligence and enforcement, told a House of Commons committee hearing on Oct. 21 that the agency can track who is leaving Canada, their method of transportation, their date of birth and the travel documents they use.

He said CBSA doesn’t currently have the ability to determine if someone is leaving because of an expired visa. McCrorie told the committee it can manually check that on a case-by-case basis, a process he described as “very labour-intensive.”

People with temporary visas contributed to a major increase in asylum claims in 2024.

A response to a written question from Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner on asylum claims shows more than 112,000 people on temporary resident visas and nearly 22,000 people with study permits applied for asylum in 2024….

Source: Immigration minister wants department to track exits of temporary residents

Lagacé: Les immigrants, le PEQ et nous

Good column in its general messaging and the impact of no grandfathering of those who had already applied under PEQ:

Un, une société vieillissante comme le Québec, qui fait peu d’enfants, a besoin d’immigrants pour s’assurer que dans 25 ans, dans 50 ans, il y aura suffisamment de citoyens pour financer les services… Et les soins aux vieux. On n’en sort pas.

Là-dessus, je vous invite à consulter une analyse de Gérald Fillion1 qui montre ce que la stagnation démographique nous réserve comme périls parce que nous accueillons moins d’immigrants que le reste du Canada.

Deux, notre société devra toujours se battre pour franciser ses immigrants. Ça peut être irritant pour certains immigrants, mais c’est comme l’hiver : ça vient avec le choix de vivre ici.

Trois, l’immigration diversifie une société, c’est un atout indéniable, à plein d’égards. Mais la diversification pour la diversification n’est pas une politique d’immigration digne de ce nom.

Quatre, je crois que la « capacité d’accueil » existe bel et bien. J’entends des voix progressistes affirmer que c’est un concept inventé et je ne suis pas d’accord. On ne peut pas créer des profs pour les classes d’accueil et on ne peut pas faire apparaître comme par magie des appartements.

Cinq, je crois que nous devons accueillir des réfugiés, des gens en danger dans leur pays. Il y a parmi eux une proportion de « faux » réfugiés qui tentent de se faire passer pour des réfugiés pour échapper à leur pays : la bureaucratie fédérale est trop lente pour traiter les dossiers et établir s’ils sont de « vrais » réfugiés.

Voilà, en cinq petits paragraphes, vous savez à peu près où je loge sur l’immigration.

Maintenant, je constate aussi qu’il y a un discours anti-immigration puissant partout en Occident, un discours qui a un écho au Québec. Ce discours influence les partis politiques qui veulent gouverner.

Le « grand remplacement », le « importe le tiers monde et tu deviendras le tiers monde », la « remigration » (qui préconise la déportation d’immigrants naturalisés) : tout ce discours qui était auparavant aux marges influence désormais la pensée sur l’immigration de citoyens qui ne sont pas des extrémistes.

Le discours alarmiste de l’extrême droite, répété sur tous les tons et sur tant de tribunes, finit par être recyclé par des partis de droite qui veulent éviter de se faire bouffer leur steak électoral par les partis d’extrême droite.

Les partis plus à gauche politisent aussi l’immigration. Quand Justin Trudeau a ouvert les vannes de l’immigration, la propulsant via divers programmes à des niveaux historiques, c’était aussi une réponse au discours anti-immigrants de la droite de la droite.

L’immigration est désormais hyper-polarisée, partout.

Aux États-Unis, l’immigration est un enjeu chaud depuis des décennies. Républicains et démocrates n’ont jamais pu trouver de terrain d’entente sur la façon de faire face aux entrées irrégulières à la frontière sud. Il y avait, en effet, un « free for all » à cette frontière.

De chaude, la question est devenue bouillante aux États-Unis. Ça a mené à ces politiques d’expulsion où la flicaille trumpiste de l’immigration pêche à la dynamite pour capturer et expulser des gens qui ont « l’air » non américains, en se fichant des droits des uns et des autres dans un contexte plus large d’érosion de l’État de droit aux États-Unis.

Nous n’en sommes pas là au Québec. Heureusement.

La CAQ n’est donc pas le Parti républicain de Trump. Resserrer des critères bureaucratiques ici et là n’est pas l’ICE portant un Kanuk sous nos latitudes boréales.

Mais la suspicion face à l’immigration, je trouve, nous fait prendre des décisions à la fois cruelles et contre-productives, ici.

Prenez le PEQ, le Programme de l’expérience québécoise. Il permettait à des immigrants, s’ils répondaient à certains critères – maîtrise du français, emploi, études –, d’embarquer sur la voie rapide vers la résidence permanente.

La CAQ a aboli le PEQ en novembre dernier. Certains immigrants, qui remplissaient les critères, qui avaient été attirés ici par l’État lors d’opérations de recrutement à l’étranger, se butent désormais à une porte close : le PEQ n’existe plus.

On les oriente vers une autre porte, celle du Programme de sélection des travailleurs qualifiés (PSTQ).

Ce programme est plus restrictif, impose de nouveaux critères, fonctionne par tirage au sort.

Résultat : des gens qui ont choisi le Québec, qui ont planté ici leurs racines, qui parlent français… font désormais face à une incertitude. Certains ont liquidé leurs actifs, chez eux, pour miser sur le Québec, via le PEQ.

Et là, boum, la porte est fermée. Ils ont joué selon les règles du jeu. Nous avons changé les règles du jeu…

Et je trouve ça cruel en tabarslak.

Depuis, des voix2 s’élèvent pour demander une clause « grand-père » pour ceux qui étaient dans le pipeline du PEQ. Du maire de Québec à la mairesse de Montréal en passant par les patrons, les syndicats, des PME, le PLQ, QS et j’en passe : cette coalition disparate implore le ministre de l’Immigration Jean-François Roberge de rouvrir la porte du PEQ pour ceux qui étaient sur le balcon…

Réponse de M. Roberge, vendredi : Non, il n’y aura pas de clause de droits acquis. Cognez à la porte du PSTQ.

L’ambassadeur de France à Ottawa, Michel Miraillet, a récemment posé3 un regard tristement lucide sur la fin du PEQ, « symbole d’un basculement », selon le diplomate, basculement qui envoie un message dissuasif aux Français qui seraient tentés de choisir le Québec et le Canada : « On voit arriver des Français qui avaient décidé de tout vendre pour s’installer au Québec et qui, au bout de deux ans, se voient priés de quitter le pays. »

Bref, nos politiques d’immigration sont devenues tellement incohérentes, à cause de la politisation, que le Québec renonce à… des immigrants français !

On veut tellement apaiser des peurs – légitimes et souvent illégitimes – face à l’immigration en général qu’on se prive même d’immigrants français, ici où le français est censé être le bastion de notre petite société distincte en Amérique.

Humainement, c’est cruel, pour eux.

Collectivement, la démographie est têtue : nous scions la branche sur laquelle nous sommes assis.

La facture va nous tomber dessus dans 25 ans : c’est après-demain, à l’échelle d’un peuple.

Source: Les immigrants, le PEQ et nous

One, an aging society like Quebec, which has few children, needs immigrants to ensure that in 25 years, in 50 years, there will be enough citizens to finance services… And care for the elderly. We don’t get out of it.

On this, I invite you to consult an analysis by Gérald Fillion1 which shows what demographic stagnation holds for us as dangers because we welcome fewer immigrants than the rest of Canada.

Two, our society will always have to fight to Frenchize its immigrants. It can be irritating for some immigrants, but it’s like winter: it comes with the choice of living here.

Three, immigration diversifies a society, it is an undeniable asset, in many respects. But diversification for diversification is not an immigration policy worthy of the name.

Four, I believe that the “capacity of reception” does exist. I hear progressive voices say that it is an invented concept and I do not agree. We can’t create teachers for reception classes and we can’t magically make apartments appear.

Five, I believe that we must welcome refugees, people in danger in their country. Among them, there is a proportion of “fake” refugees who try to pretend to be refugees to escape their country: the federal bureaucracy is too slow to process files and establish whether they are “real” refugees.

Here, in five small paragraphs, you know roughly where I am on immigration.

Now, I also see that there is a powerful anti-immigration discourse throughout the West, a discourse that has an echo in Quebec. This discourse influences political parties that want to govern.

The “great replacement”, the “import the third world and you will become the third world”, the “remigration” (which advocates the deportation of naturalized immigrants): all this discourse that was previously on the margins now influences thinking about the immigration of citizens who are not extremists.

The alarmist speech of the extreme right, repeated in all tones and in so many stands, ends up being recycled by right-wing parties that want to avoid having their electoral steak eaten by far-right parties.

The more left-wing parties also politicize immigration. When Justin Trudeau opened the floodgates of immigration, propelling it through various programs to historical levels, it was also a response to the anti-immigrant discourse of the right of the right.

Immigration is now hyper-polarized, everywhere.

In the United States, immigration has been a hot issue for decades. Republicans and Democrats have never been able to find common ground on how to deal with irregular entries at the southern border. There was, in fact, a “free for all” at this border.

From hot, the issue has become boiling in the United States. It has led to these expulsion policies where the Trumpist immigration cops fish for dynamite to capture and expel people who “look” non-American, not caring about the rights of each other in a broader context of erosion of the rule of law in the United States.

We are not here in Quebec. Fortunately.

The CAQ is therefore not Trump’s Republican Party. Tightening bureaucratic criteria here and there is not the ICE carrying a Kanuk under our boreal latitudes.

But suspicion of immigration, I think, makes us make decisions that are both cruel and counterproductive here.

Take the PEQ, the Quebec Experience Program. It allowed immigrants, if they met certain criteria – mastery of French, employment, studies – to embark on the expressway to permanent residence.

The CAQ abolished the PEQ last November. Some immigrants, who met the criteria, who had been attracted here by the State during recruitment operations abroad, now bump into a closed door: the PEQ no longer exists.

They are directed to another door, that of the Skilled Worker Selection Program (PSTQ).

This program is more restrictive, imposes new criteria, works by lottery.

Result: people who have chosen Quebec, who have planted their roots here, who speak French… are now facing uncertainty. Some have liquidated their assets, at home, to bet on Quebec, via the PEQ.

And there, boom, the door is closed. They played according to the rules of the game. We changed the rules of the game…

And I find it cruel in tabarslak.

Since then, voices2 have been raised to call for a “grandfather” clause for those who were in the PEQ pipeline. From the mayor of Quebec to the mayor of Montreal via bosses, unions, SMEs, the PLQ, QS and so on: this disparate coalition implores the Minister of Immigration Jean-François Roberge to reopen the door of the PEQ for those who were on the balcony…

Answer from Mr. Roberge, Friday: No, there will be no acquired rights clause. Knock on the door of the PSTQ.

The French Ambassador to Ottawa, Michel Miraillet, recently put3 a sadly lucid look at the end of the PEQ, “symbol of a changeover”, according to the diplomat, a change that sends a deterrent message to the French who would be tempted to choose Quebec and Canada: “We see the arrival of French people who had decided to sell everything to settle in Quebec and who, after two years, are asked to leave the country. ”

In short, our immigration policies have become so inconsistent, because of politicization, that Quebec renounces… French immigrants!

We want so much to appease fears – legitimate and often illegitimate – in the face of immigration in general that we even deprive ourselves of French immigrants, here where French is supposed to be the bastion of our distinct little society in America.

Humanly, it’s cruel to them.

Collectively, the demographics are stubborn: we saw the branch on which we are sitting.

The bill will fall on us in 25 years: it’s the day after tomorrow, on the scale of a people.

International students in Canada face vastly different health-care access depending on where they live. Here’s what researchers found

Useful comparison (I had to generate a similar analysis to separate out non-resident self-pay international students from those covered under provincial health plans for my birth tourism analysis:

…Of all provinces and territories, Alberta, New Brunswick, Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan and Prince Edward Island have the greatest access to free public health care for international students, while those studying in Ontario, Manitoba and Yukon only have private options.

B.C. requires a three-month waiting period and a monthly $75 fee to get on the provincial health insurance plan. In Quebec, public free health-care services are only available for students from one of the countries that have signed a social security agreement with the province; others must buy private insurance offered at their university or other private health insurance.

In Newfoundland and Labrador all international students enrolled full time for at least 12 months are automatically registered for the Foreign Health Insurance plan — $261.59 per semester — while Nova Scotia only offers free public health care after one year of study.

Those in Ontario post-secondary education must enrol in the private insurance plans provided by their institutions. Most universities use the University Health Insurance Plan (UHIP) at an annual premium of $792, while colleges use other providers with varying fees.

In Manitoba, international students pay an annual fee of $1,200 for private health insurance. The mandatory group insurance plan for students in Yukon cost $565 a year.

“The students I talked to didn’t know that these disparities existed across Canada,” said report author Tracy Glynn, a director of the Canadian Health Coalition, a national advocacy group supporting public health care. “It’s just by luck if somebody ends up in, say, New Brunswick, where there’s public care available immediately.”…

Source: International students in Canada face vastly different health-care access depending on where they live. Here’s what researchers found

Immigration Department on alert for asylum claims during World Cup

Well, will likely be some:

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada is closely scrutinizing visa applications from soccer fans planning to attend the World Cup, to prevent people from entering the country with the aim of claiming asylum.

Officials are warning that ticketholders could be refused visas or turned away by border agents if it is feared they may not return home after the international soccer tournament ends this summer.

Canada, the United States and Mexico are co-hosting the event, organized by soccer’s international governing body, FIFA. Thirteen World Cup matches will be played in Toronto and Vancouver in June and July.

Among the national teams that will play here, in addition to Canada, are Germany, Ghana, Panama, Australia, Qatar, Egypt, Ivory Coast and Senegal.

FIFA says it has received over 500 million ticket requests for 2026 World Cup

As Canada prepares to welcome thousands of fans to the tournament, immigration officials are warning that coming here to attend matches is not an avenue to refugee status.

Source: Immigration Department on alert for asylum claims during World Cup

Canada will require refugees and asylum seekers to co-pay for health care starting in May

Significant change. Major expenses still fully covered however:

Starting May 1, Ottawa will require sponsored refugees and asylum seekers to co-pay for their health-care coverage, a move that critics worry will lead to delayed and possibly denied access to care.

The co-payment plan — first revealed in Ottawa’s 2025 budget in November — will apply to refugees sponsored to Canada by the federal government and community groups in their first year in the country, as well as asylum claimants who arrive at the border for protection.

Patients will still be fully covered under the Interim Federal Health Program’s basic plan to see doctors and specialists, access hospital care, and for diagnostics.

However, they will now be asked to pay out of pocket 30 per cent of the costs of services such as dental, optometry and physiotherapy under its supplemental benefit plan. They will also be charged a $4 flat rate on each prescription….

Source: Canada will require refugees and asylum seekers to co-pay for health care starting in May, Co-payments for supplemental health benefits

“La communauté musulmane de Québec déplore l’intransigeance du gouvernement”

A noter:

“Neuf ans se sont écoulés depuis la tuerie de la grande mosquée de Québec, mais des séquelles se font encore sentir, ravivées par les lois sur la laïcité adoptées par le gouvernement caquiste, qui « encouragent la xénophobie et le racisme », selon les leaders de la communauté musulmane de la capitale.

Le 29 janvier 2017, au moment où Alexandre Bissonnette faisait irruption au milieu de la prière pour ouvrir le feu sur les fidèles, une fillette se tenait entre le tireur et ses victimes. « C’est ma fille. Elle avait huit ans », a raconté mercredi Nizar Ghali, blessé par deux balles à l’abdomen lors de la tragédie.

Le père de famille, ce soir-là, a frôlé la mort sous les yeux de son enfant. Dans les jours qui ont suivi l’attaque, pendant que la ville se recueillait, consternée, et pleurait les six défunts, Nizar Ghali, lui, luttait pour sa vie à l’hôpital, plongé dans le coma.

Aujourd’hui tiré d’affaire — « le corps va bien, l’esprit va quand même assez bien aussi », précisait-il mercredi au Devoir à la veille des commémorations —, il travaille à combattre les « amalgames » qui font le lit, à son avis, du racisme et de la xénophobie.

“Et il en a long à dire sur la vision de la laïcité promue par le gouvernement caquiste. La loi 21 sur l’interdiction des signes religieux et son expansion dans les garderies subventionnées par l’État prévue par le projet de loi 9 passent mal. « Les femmes voilées se sentent lésées par ces lois-là parce qu’elles estiment qu’[elles] sont faites spécifiquement pour elles », explique le docteur diplômé de l’Université Laval. « Pour nous, ça envoie le message que l’État ne veut pas que la femme musulmane prenne de l’expansion dans la société. »

Sa fille, aujourd’hui âgée de 17 ans, a décidé de porter le hidjab. Le père, lui, craint que ce choix ne constitue un obstacle à son épanouissement.

« Ce n’est pas le passé qui nous inquiète, c’est l’avenir, confie Nizar Ghali. Elle arrive à l’âge où tout le monde commence à entrevoir un petit peu son avenir. Il est encore trop tôt pour savoir quel genre de job elle va chercher ou quel domaine d’études elle va poursuivre, mais si elle rencontre des embûches, c’est sûr que ça va être de plus en plus difficile pour elle. Si, au contraire, elle trouve une société qui l’accueille comme elle est, je présume que ça va la soulager après ce qu’elle a vécu. »”…

Source: “La communauté musulmane de Québec déplore l’intransigeance du gouvernement”

“Nine years have passed since the killing of the Great Mosque in Quebec City, but sequelae are still being felt, revived by the laws on secularism adopted by the Caquist government, which “encourage xenophobia and racism,” according to the leaders of the capital’s Muslim community.

On January 29, 2017, when Alexandre Bissonnette broke into the middle of prayer to open fire on the faithful, a girl stood between the shooter and his victims. “She’s my daughter. She was eight years old, “said Nizar Ghali on Wednesday, wounded by two bullets in the abdomen during the tragedy.

The father of the family, that evening, come close to death before the eyes of his child. In the days following the attack, while the city was gathering, dismayed, and mourning the six deceased, Nizar Ghali was fighting for his life in the hospital, immersed in a coma.

Today out of trouble – “the body is fine, the mind is still quite well too,” he said Wednesday at Le Devoir on the eve of the commemorations – he is working to fight the “amalgams” that make the bed, in his opinion, of racism and xenophobia.

“And he has a lot to say about the vision of secularism promoted by the Caquist government. Bill 21 on the prohibition of religious signs and its expansion into state-subsidized daycare centers provided for by Bill 9 is doing badly. “Women with veils feel aged by these laws because they believe that [they] are made specifically for them,” explains the doctor graduated from Université Laval. “For us, it sends the message that the State does not want Muslim women to expand in society. ”

His daughter, now 17 years old, decided to wear the hijab. The father, for his part, fears that this choice will be an obstacle to his development. “It’s not the past that worries us, it’s the future,” says Nizar Ghali. She reaches the age where everyone begins to see a little bit of her future. It is still too early to know what kind of job she will look for or what field of study she will pursue, but if she encounters pitfalls, it is certain that it will be more and more difficult for her. If, on the contrary, she finds a society that welcomes her as she is, I assume that it will relieve her after what she has experienced. “…

Why do 3 major diseases disproportionately impact Black Canadians? New genome project aims to find out

Useful and important study. As noted, developing trust will be a challenge:

Black people are disproportionately impacted by certain diseases, including Type 2 diabetes, hypertension and an aggressive form of breast cancer known as triple-negative. Starting on Feb. 1, researchers from Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia are launching the genCARE project to map the genomes of more than 10,000 Black Canadians with these three diseases, as well as people who have no underlying medical conditions.

The leaders of the project — funded by Genome Canada — hope their findings will help inform where treatment and preventive care can be targeted, as well as achieve more equitable, anti-racist health outcomes.

“If we are not there, we will not be counted,” Prescod said. “We will not be involved in finding solutions.”

Prescod estimates that less than five per cent of genetic studies worldwide include data from Black people, which means the findings of those studies may not apply to them.

Prescod hopes the research results will allow her to help her patients at Black Creek better manage their conditions.

The ultimate goal of genCARE, according to Dr. Upton Allen, the project’s administrative lead, is to take a patient’s genetic makeup and other factors into consideration during diagnosis and treatment — a practice known as precision medicine.

“It might help us to better understand why certain people get these disorders, why some get it more severe than others,” Allen said. “It might even help us to better design treatments that are more targeted.” 

Overcoming mistrust

Allen says researchers involved with the project must overcome a long history of discrimination against Black people that has fuelled their mistrust of medical institutions. 

And that makes recruitment difficult in a project that he says needs thousands of participants.

Source: Why do 3 major diseases disproportionately impact Black Canadians? New genome project aims to find out

MPs eye support for expat voters as PROC study on special ballot challenges wraps

Working on an analysis of these voters by riding, province and country of residence. Unfortunately, but also understandably, we don’t have party breakdowns of expat votes given confidentiality concerns. Committee report not released yet. Stay tuned:

A House committee study on challenges related to special ballot voting—particularly the experiences of expat voters—is coming to a close, and Liberal MPArielle Kayabaga says she has her sights on what more the foreign affairs department can do to help Canadians abroad cast their votes after hearing that some are paying out of pocket to ensure their ballots are counted.

“One of things that we’re looking to see is how Global Affairs Canada can partner with Canadians that live abroad to stay engaged … especially when there’s an election, where people can get up-to-date information through the already existing infrastructures that we have as services for Canadians abroad,” Kayabaga (London West, Ont.) told The Hill Times.

“The goal here is to really figure out ways to make it easy for Canadians to participate electorally and do their civic duty,” whether at home or abroad, Kayabaga said. “We have put forward helpful recommendations that will increase access and improve the processes in which Canadians vote, especially those who are voting with a special ballot.”

The Procedure and House Affairs Committee (PROC) launched its study on special ballot voting on Nov. 6, 2025, and heard from 13 witnesses over the course of four meetings.

Last spring’s election saw the highest number of Canadians yet cast their votes by special ballot, use of which has more than doubled over the last decade. But it also saw some challenges, with multiple instances of domestically cast special ballots mistakenly left out of official vote counts, leading Elections Canada to launch an internal review. The agency published its resulting report, outlining three phases of changes it’s pursuing, on Dec. 15, 2025.

…Timothy Veale, director of Grits Abroad, and Daniel Scuka, a Canadian currently living in Germany, were the first to testify before PROC, and spoke to the barriers facing expat voters. Veale said he sees “three main barriers” overall: technical, as voting is done by snail mail, which is made more challenging during short, snap campaigns; structural, as international voters “have no direct representation in Parliament,” leaving many, “in effect, disenfranchised,” whereas some countries, like France, have “dedicated overseas MPs”; and political, in terms of a lack of will to effect change. He noted other diasporas, including French expats, “outvoteus by a wide margin.”

That disconnect is something Scuka, who works for the European Space Agency, also touched on, saying “few, if any, candidates commit time or resources” to engage international voters. Scuka supported Veale’s argument for the creation of dedicated MPs to represent overseas voters, and also noted the disconnect created by how votes are counted, noting his last address in Canadawas in Ottawa, a place he only lived for two years, and to which he feels little connection.

Multiple witnesses highlighted the onus put on international voters to ensure their votes are returned on time in the current mail-in system. Scuka said it “took several weeks” after the 2025 campaign began for his ballot to arrive, and he’s previously paid the equivalent of $60 to ensure it made it back in time. Both Veale and Scuka said they’re unsure whether their ballots were ultimately even counted last year.

Another witness, Lucia Kovacikova, a Canadian expert on expat voting currently teach ing in Wisconsin, said she, too, received her ballot “quite late inthe process” last election, and paid $120 to use a private carrier to ensure it got counted.

Kayabaga said reports of expats incurring fees in trying to vote are an example of something she thinks the committee can “look at and figure out ways to improve.”

Scuka said Elections Canada should automatically identify international voters as part of the list of electors it shares with candidates, and urged the committee to consider enabling “Elections Canada to offer any mix of in-person voting or ballot drop-off at consulates or embassies, ballot return via tracked courier envelopes that are potentially prepaid, and the issuance of ballots and returned material via a digital platform,” which would enable voters abroad to “track the status of their ballots.”

Per the Canada Elections Act, expats are allowed to drop-off sealed ballot envelopes at Canadian embassies, high commissions, or consulates, “a Canadian Forces base or to any place that the Chief Electoral Officer may designate.”It does not, however, currently provide for in-person voting.

As part of her remarks, Dalhousie University professor Lori Turnbull said she’d welcome “giving more thought to electronic voting” as an option for all Canadians, including expats—an idea Kovacikova backed. Turnbull also suggested Elections Canada could likely do more to engage voters abroad “well in advance” of an election.

Among the witness list were a number of experts on the voting experiences of other diasporas.

Appearing on Nov. 25, 2025, Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault highlighted that while there was comparative “high-interest” among international voters last election, “more than half” registered after writs were issued. Data shows the later people register, the lower the return rate, he said.

Global Affairs Canada’s Kati Csaba spoke to the support her department offers—support that’s impeded, though, by the fact “many Canadians living abroad aren’t in contact” with GAC. GAC’s current role, she said, “is simply to provide logistical support through Canada’s network of diplomatic missionsabroad,” including by answering “general questions” about voting (“more complex inquiries” are directed to Elections Canada), emailing or faxing applications to register on behalf of expats who need help, posting information on their website, and sharing relevant updates on social media.Voters can also use missions as their mailing address in receiving special ballots, or to drop off completed ballots, she noted.

Conservative MP Michael Cooper (St. Albert–Sturgeon River,Alta.) said following the study he overall feels assured that “the special ballot voting process is working.” “There may be some areas for some minor changes … with respect to seeing that special ballot kits are delivered in a timely manner for Canadians living abroad,” he said, noting as well that he still has some questions over how Elections Canada verifies that ballots it mails overseas are received by eligible voters. “That’s something that I think warrants some further examination.”

On the idea of adding MPs to represent international electors, Cooper was not convinced, and said he’s “not heard any real appetite for” such a change…

Source: MPs eye support for expat voters as PROC study on special ballot challenges wraps

StatsCan – Fertility and intentions: Socioeconomic factors

Interesting differences among visible minority groups, born in Canada and immigrants, religious non-religious:

In Canada, women’s family trajectories have seen major changes in recent decades. Increased educational levels, greater participation in the labour market, changing social norms and the widespread use of contraception have contributed to diversifying life paths, notably in terms of childbearing.

This reality is directly related to the sharp decline in fertility observed in Canada. In 2024, Canada became part of the group of countries with “ultra-low fertility,” with a total fertility rate of 1.25 children per woman. This strong decline in fertility is due not only to a decreased birth rate, but also to an increase in the number of women who do not have children either by choice, by circumstance or because they are delaying motherhood. In fact, the average age of mothers at the birth of their first child has been increasing in Canada for decades. In 2024, it reached an all-time high of 31.8 years. Although the decline in fertility is partly due to women delaying having children, the proportion of women aged 50 years and older with no children has also been increasing over a period of more than 30 years, from 14.1% in 1990 to 17.4% in 2022.

In a context where having children is being increasingly delayed, understanding the fertility intentions of women without children who are still of reproductive age is essential because having children as planned can affect the well-being and life satisfaction of individuals and families. To address these issues, the 2024 Survey on Family Transitions (SFT) was designed to explore the experiences of families in Canada over time by examining how individuals and families change throughout various life stages. The results can be used to develop programs and policies to improve the well-being of children and families.

Using these data, this release first examines the proportion of Canadian women of childbearing age (i.e., women aged 20 to 49 years without any biological or adopted children) and then considers their fertility intentions. The release highlights sociodemographic characteristics associated with not having children and with fertility intentions, such as age group, education level, employment status, marital status, immigrant status and population group. It aims to increase understanding of current trends and shed light on issues related to the diversity of women’s parental trajectories in a low-fertility context.

Source: Fertility and intentions: Socioeconomic factors