PQ reaps the intolerance it sowed with values charter

Another bad week on identity politics in Quebec and the ugly side of the PQ election and Charter strategy, starting with Graeme Hamilton of the Post:

Following a question about France from Paul Arcand, a radio host on 98.5 FM, Mr. Fontecilla said France is “far from a model” for integrating immigrants. “I would like to point out to Mr. Drainville that the theme of secularism was appropriated by the French right and even the extreme right, [former president Nicolas] Sarkozy and [National Front leader] Marine Le Pen,” he said. He added later that he is surprised the PQ has focused on a charter of Quebec values that promotes a “closing in on ourselves” and “anti-Muslim reactions.”

The PQ’s all-out barrage against Québec Solidaire sounds like a party that doth protest too much. Consider that, in less than a week, two PQ candidates have been caught up in controversy for intolerant comments toward religious minorities.

Jean Carrière stepped down Thursday as a candidate in the Montreal riding of Lafontaine after an image he shared on Facebook declared “F— Islam,” and posts praising Ms. Le Pen, came to light.

Another PQ candidate, college philosophy professor Louise Mailloux, has been allowed to remain as the PQ candidate for Gouin despite declaring last week that she stands behind her writings declaring that kosher and halal food are part of a conspiracy to enrich rabbis and imams and fund religious wars. She also likened circumcision and baptism to rape.

Graeme Hamilton: PQ reaps the intolerance it sowed with values charter | National Post.

Bernie Farber in the Star piles on, correctly so on Marois’ refusal to dissociate herself with Mailloux:

Many in the Jewish community are stunned by these developments, even though they have heard Marois categorically state that the PQ is not an anti-Semitic party. Indeed, Marois told journalists last week that the PQ counts many friends among the Jewish community leadership. Sounds an awful lot like some of my best friends are …
This past weekend, in a dismal attempt at damage control, Mailloux offered her version of an apology. She said she never meant to “offend anyone” and apologized if she did. There was no contrition or acknowledgment that the “kosher tax” was in fact an anti-Semitic deception. Jewish groups quite rightly rejected her apology.
This latest trek down bigotry’s path, along with the discriminatory Charter of Quebec Values, is giving many in Quebec’s faith and ethnic communities a legitimate scare. It is time we hold politicians who make such absurd comments accountable. And it is more than time that we reject political leaders who embrace the path of ethnic and faith intolerance.

Parti Québécois candidate revives an anti-Semitic lie

Surprising the that blog post in question by Mailloux is still up:

Le poulet sacré

Le malaise musulman – La Presse+

Not surprising, and illustrates why the PQ is using its identity politics and Charter strategy (English Canada also has a more negative impression of Muslims compared to other faith groups, but not to this extent):

La barrière est énorme : 72 % des non-francophones disent avoir une opinion positive des musulmans, mais seulement 36 % des francophones pensent de même. Intuitivement, Youri Rivest, vice-président de CROP, s’est demandé si cela pouvait s’expliquer par le fait que les francophones vivent beaucoup en région et qu’ils ne sont pas habitués à voir des gens d’autres cultures.

Or, M. Rivest signale que, vérification faite, cette variable compte peu. La différence dans la perception des musulmans par les francophones et les non-francophones ne peut pas non plus s’expliquer par le fait que les non-francophones de l’échantillon sont personnellement touchés par la Charte, puisque leur cohorte compte tout autant de musulmans que de Chinois, de Grecs, d’Italiens que d’hispanophones, pour qui la Charte ne changera rien à leurs habitudes.

N’empêche, ces gens sont peut-être spontanément sensibles au fait d’être minoritaires, avance M. Rivest. Mais la différence fondamentale dans la perception des musulmans réside ailleurs à son avis : cela serait une question de valeurs. « Parmi les Québécois qui ont une opinion négative des musulmans, observe-t-il, 82 % ont l’impression que les immigrés ont des valeurs différentes de celles des Québécois et 84 % estiment que les immigrés devraient mettre de côté leur culture et s’adapter à celle du Québec »

Le malaise musulman – La Presse+.

Dan Delmar: The Parti Québécois’ shadow media empire | National Post

The points on Quebecor’s role in identity politics are interesting:

“Some people sell cheap perfume,” the National Post’s Andrew Coyne wrote this week. “Mr. Péladeau is in the cheap-emotion end of things, peddling different brands of phony outrage to different audiences.”

Since the first Quebec “reasonable accommodation” crisis of 2007, Péladeau’s newspapers have featured prominent reports and columns about ethnic integration in Quebec society — or, more accurately, an alleged lack thereof.

When’s Drainville’s Nebraska precedent turned out to be based on an artifact from the segregation era, the issue was ignored by Quebecor

That crisis, highlighted by the town of Hérouxville’s anti-Muslim “cod of behaviour,” boosted then Action démocratique du Québec (ADQ) leader Mario Dumont to the position of leader of the official opposition (his party later folded, and many members joined the Coalition Avenir Québec). Dumont is now a host on Péladeau’s news network, LCN.

Hérouxville, and the Bouchard-Taylor Commission called in response to the issue (whose findings were ignored by the PQ), is seen as a precursor to Drainville’s Charter of Values.

Dan Delmar: The Parti Québécois’ shadow media empire | National Post.

Reasonable Accommodation and the Niqab – Quebec Ruling

Good example where an administrative tribunal made the right call in refusing an accommodation, in this case, for a medical examination required to justify an ongoing disability claim.

http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/201403/06/01-4745405-voile-chez-le-medecin-la-csst-a-gain-de-cause.php

Quebec Values Charter and Elections

More catching up, starting with the polling numbers:

http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/dossiers/charte-de-la-laicite/201403/03/01-4744020-lappui-a-la-charte-est-maintenant-majoritaire.php

Continuing with running on the Charter, confirming identity politics rather than substance:

http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/politique-quebecoise/201403/04/01-4744656-marois-veut-une-majorite-pour-adopter-la-charte.php

No surprise that allophones and anglophones see the Charter primarily targeting Muslim women:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/most-anglos-allophones-say-secular-values-charter-targets-muslim-women-1.2558409?cmp=rss

A rare declaration of principle from the a senior staffer in Jean-Francois Lisée’s office:

http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/politique-quebecoise/201403/04/01-4744694-lisee-perd-sa-directrice-de-cabinet-adjointe-a-cause-de-la-charte.php

A wide range of commentary on the elections, and have selected only a few. From the Globe, Antonia Maioni’s fatalistic prediction, The PQ’s appeal is locked in, a more nuanced assessment by Chantal Hébert, Quebec election not a foregone conclusion, and Daniel Weinstock’s longer-term perspective, Québec at a Crossroads

Following the announcement of Pierre Karl Peladeau, the owner of Quebecor, Quebec’s media conglomerate, that he will run as a PQ candidate, lot’s of commentary and speculation what this means in the short and long-term. Summary by Chris Selley in the National Post provides a good sense of reactions, Full Pundit: Will Péladeaumania cure Marois malaise? Makes it clear sovereignty is on the agenda despite Maurois’s calculated ambiguity.

Lastly, a reminder that the election call meant the end of Parliamentary hearings on the proposed Charter, including this good brief from the Montreal Holocaust Centre, which has done good work in engaging the diverse communities in Montreal on Holocaust and intolerance issues:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/touch/story.html?id=9593693

Marois a montré de l’intérêt pour le projet de loi de Houda-Pepin

Although the big news in Quebec is the upcoming elections and the increasing likelihood of a PQ majority government (the gambit of the Charter and the weakness of the opposition leaders), still interesting to note Fatima Houda-Pepin’s bill and the PQ use of it to advance the Charter and embarrass the Liberals:

Dans son projet de loi, la députée définit l’intégrisme religieux comme étant «une idéologie politique qui tend à imposer aux individus, à la société et à l’État des pratiques et des valeurs issues d’une interprétation radicale des religions, notamment les discours portant atteinte au droit à l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et incitant à la discrimination et à la violence ainsi que la propagande haineuse appelant à la légitimation du crime en vue de saper les bases de la démocratie et les droits de la personne».

Marois a montré de l’intérêt pour le projet de loi de Houda-Pepin | Jocelyne Richer | Politique québécoise.

Quebec Values Charter – Varia

Starting with Jean Charest, former Quebec Premier, who managed the political pressures related to reasonable accommodation through the Bouchard-Taylor Commission and Report:

Invité par un groupe de réflexion sur le fédéralisme, à Montréal, il a affirmé que, dans tous les cas, avant de restreindre des libertés, il faut démontrer qu’il y a un réel problème.

Accompagné de l’ancien premier ministre fédéral Brian Mulroney, M. Charest a souligné qu’il serait difficile pour les Québécois de plaider leur différence reliée à la langue française tout en interdisant celle de certaines personnes.

L’ex-premier ministre du Québec envoyait ainsi une flèche au projet du gouvernement Marois visant notamment à interdire aux employés de l’État de porter des signes religieux ostentatoires en milieu de travail.

Selon lui, une société devrait cultiver le sentiment d’acceptation plutôt que de faire le contraire.

http://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/400106/quebec-doit-justifier-la-necessite-d-une-charte-de-la-laicite-dit-jean-charest

A reminder that the PQ government’s approach to secularism is selective:

Le Conseil du patrimoine religieux du Québec joue un peu le rôle de grand argentier auprès du milieu, qu’il soutient en administrant les sommes dévolues tant à la promotion qu’à la conservation du patrimoine religieux. Depuis 1995, le ministère de la Culture et des Communications a financé le Conseil à une hauteur de plus de 270 millions. Ce montant s’élève dorénavant à 290 millions. « Cette nouvelle entente correspond davantage à la réalité et aux besoins du Québec d’aujourd’hui en matière de protection du patrimoine », a déclaré Maka Kotto.

http://www.ledevoir.com/culture/actualites-culturelles/400099/quebec-debloque-20-millions-pour-le-patrimoine-religieux

More on the saga between Fatima Houda-Pepin and Philippe Coulliard, benefiting nobody apart from the PQ govt:

La députée indépendante a fait connaître mercredi un projet de loi de lutte contre l’intégrisme sur lequel elle travaillait depuis quelques années. « Pendant que moi je luttais contre l’intégrisme au Québec, Philippe Couillard était en train de faire un coup d’argent en Arabie saoudite, qui est la principale mamelle qui finance les intégrismes partout dans le monde, au Canada et au Québec. Donc, il peut toujours courir en essayant de me salir. »

http://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/400107/couillard-se-fait-l-allie-des-integristes-accuse-houda-pepin

Drainville dit non au compromis de Fatima Houda-Pepin and Related Charter News

Further to my post Laïcité: Fatima Houda-Pepin dépose son projet de loi | Charte de la laïcité, not too surprising that the PQ government is maintaining their firm line to keep the proposed Charter as it is (while welcoming the dissension within the Liberal Party of Quebec).

«Je respecte la position de Mme Houda-Pepin, mais ce que je dis depuis le départ, c’est que la recommandation de Bouchard-Taylor, c’est un point de départ, ce n’est pas un point d’arrivée. Je pense que Bouchard-Taylor, c’est minimaliste sur les signes religieux», a-t-il [Minister Drainville] expliqué.

Drainville dit non au compromis de Fatima Houda-Pepin | TOMMY CHOUINARD | Politique québécoise.

In other Charter related news, a spirited discussion between Minister Drainville and the Montreal School Board, pointing out some of the contradictions in the Charter in relation to other Quebec laws:

But Mancini responded to Drainville by turning around his questions, asking whether he is aware that Article 37 of the Education Act stipulates schools must respect the freedom of conscience and religion of students.

And the spirit of the act makes it the duty of schools to teach students to respect religious diversity and pluralism.

The government’s Bill 60 proposes to ban the wearing of all religious symbols in the public sector, including the education sector, in the belief the symbols advertise faiths and young minds will be influenced.

It’s the first time in weeks of hearings that the committee has heard this argument.

“This is what we are asking you,” Mancini said. “Which laws must we disobey?”

We don’t want to disobey one or the other, but you are putting us in a position where we don’t know what to do

Montreal school board threatens to fight values charter with ‘all possible resources’ in faceoff with minister

PLQ Couillard, still struggling to define his party’s position, noted how exclusion can foster fundamentalism and extremism:

La charte de la laïcité accroîtra la discrimination à l’emploi dont sont victimes les femmes musulmanes portant un voile. « [Toute politique qui] dit à une femme : “ On ne veut pas que tu sois avec nous. On ne veut pas te voir. Retourne chez toi ” bâtit le sentiment d’exclusion et nourrit les gens qui font de la propagande pour recruter d’autres citoyens dans les rangs des intégristes », a expliqué M. Couillard dans un entretien avec Radio-Canada. La charte de la laïcité est du coup « exactement […] ce dont ils ont besoin ».

La charte alimentera l’intégrisme religieux, craint Philippe Couillard

More on former Supreme Court Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé’s support for the Quebec Values Charter:

But speaking last week at a legislative committee, Justice L’Heureux-Dubé said while freedom of religion is fundamental, the right to wear religious garb is not; it is less important, therefore, than women’s right to equality.

Daniel Weinstock, a philosopher of law at McGill University, said that the “contradictions speak for themselves,” not only in her support for a hierarchy of rights rejected by the court she sat on but in deferring to Quebec legislators. As a judge, she helped “lead the charge to a substantive interpretation of equality rights, taking it away from a purely formal reading. It is a bit of a reverse, to say the least, when all of a sudden her position is that courts should be deferential to legislators.”

Daniel Jutras, McGill’s dean of law, called Ms. L’Heureux-Dubé’s intervention “unacceptable. Putting the weight of a retired Supreme Court justice behind [the ban] is quite problematic. I can’t understand it.” He said her support will have significant impact “not within the legal community but it certainly will be used by the Parti Québécois to legitimate their position that this is not a simple legal issue.”

 Former Supreme Court judge’s support buoys PQ’s charter argument 

Of course, Louise Arbour, another former Supreme Court judge, opposes it (With the Charter, Quebec risks closing its mind).

Laïcité: Fatima Houda-Pepin dépose son projet de loi | Charte de la laïcité

More on the proposal of Fatima Houda-Pepin. In some ways, more sensible than the Values Charter (limited to officials in positions of authority à la Bouchard-Taylor), in others goes further in limiting requests for accommodation (e.g., school curricula). Most interestingly:

Fatima Houda-Pepin souhaite également la création d’un « centre de recherche-action sur les intégrismes religieux et leurs impacts sur la démocratie, les droits de la personne et les droits de la jeunesse.» Il aurait pour mandat « d’identifier et de documenter les manifestations d’intégrisme religieux basées sur l’instrumentalisation des religions ou sur un code d’ honneur ». Le premier ministre devrait déposer un rapport annuel contenant les résultats des travaux de ce centre et « recommander toute mesure législative ou réglementaire nécessaire à la mise en oeuvre du rapport ». Ce pourrait être « l’adoption de sanctions appropriées, telles que la révocation de l’enregistrement d’un organisme de bienfaisance aux termes de la Loi sur les impôts ».

It should be noted that Houda-Pepin has developed these proposals given some of her experience with Muslim fundamentalists in her own riding and elsewhere in Quebec.

Laïcité: Fatima Houda-Pepin dépose son projet de loi | Tommy Chouinard | Charte de la laïcité.

With the Charter, Quebec risks closing its mind – The Globe and Mail

Louise Arbour in the Globe on the Quebec Values Charter:

In short, we are called upon to choose the kind of world in which we want to live. All this talk about secularism, the neutrality of the state, tolerance or the specificity of Quebec should not obscure the fact that this is not about affirming values, but it’s about promoting and implementing them.

We have avoided the pathologies of nationalisms that feed the far right and all other forms of extremism. Quebec society is modern, open to the world and until now inclusive. In that setting, the proposed charter of secularism is a siren song. It evokes images of a homogeneous Catho-secular society where “our” religious symbols are innocuous, since we have voided them of their purely religious content, but where the religious symbols of “others” are a perpetual menace to us all.

In reality Quebec has succeeded remarkably well in absorbing immigration into a tightly knit society. Fear is always a bad adviser. Rather, social cohesion comes from a generous and welcoming spirit that induces others to integrate. This is, in fact, what newcomers have always done.

With the Charter, Quebec risks closing its mind – The Globe and Mail.

On a (relatively) positive note, the Mayor of Quebec city manages to find a balance between tolerance and his discomfort with more fundamentalist Muslim women:

« Y’a des gens qui pourraient être tentés de blâmer ces femmes-là. Je voudrais dire à ceux qui pourraient être tentés de faire ça à Québec de ne pas le faire. De surtout avoir beaucoup de compassion pour ces femmes-là qui sont obligées de s’attriquer de cette façon-là à cause de préceptes religieux, à cause d’interprétations d’une religion qui, quant à moi, sont fausses. »

M. Labeaume a par ailleurs indiqué qu’il n’avait aucun problème à laisser ces femmes porter de tels maillots. « De toute façon, des nageurs professionnels ont à peu près le même », a-t-il dit.

Il n’a pas caché par ailleurs qu’il les plaignait beaucoup et espérait qu’elles « se révoltent un jour ».

Port du burkini: ​appel à la «compassion»

Fatima Houda-Pépin, excluded from the Liberal Party of Quebec caucus, tabled her own version of laicité, narrower that the proposed Charter coverage but including the creation of an organization to monitor religious fundamentalists. Needless to say, the PQ government is delighted with this, both on substantive and political terms:

Houda-Pepin revient hanter Couillard