Québec prévoit accueillir 45 000 immigrants permanents par année

2025/11/07 Leave a comment

Greater relative restraint compared to federal government, along with tighter language requirements and ending the transition from temporary to permanent resident transition program:

Le ministre de l’Immigration, Jean-François Roberge, a déposé jeudi la Planification de l’immigration 2026-2029. Il avait procédé plus tôt cet automne à des consultations publiques à ce sujet. M. Roberge a finalement opté pour la cible d’immigration à l’étude la plus élevée, à 45 000, alors que les autres scénarios prévoyaient des seuils de 25 000 ou de 35 000 immigrants par année.

Concernant l’immigration permanente, c’est-à-dire l’immigration économique, les regroupements familiaux et les réfugiés, le gouvernement caquiste prévoit admettre entre 43 000 et 47 000 immigrants dès 2026, comparativement aux 57 210 à 61 220 personnes qui auront été admises en 2025 selon les prévisions du ministère.

Pour protéger le français, Québec vise désormais « une proportion de plus de 77 % de connaissance du français chez les personnes issues de l’immigration permanente ». Il est aussi prévu « d’accroître la part des personnes issues de l’immigration permanente déjà présentes au Québec pour que celle-ci représentent 65 % ou plus des admissions à la fin de la période ». Le gouvernement veut par ailleurs que l’immigration économique représente 64 % de l’ensemble des admissions permanentes.

Dans tous les cas, Québec prévient qu’il « pourra ajuster les seuils d’immigration permanente avant la fin de la présente planification pluriannuelle » en fonction du nombre d’immigrants temporaires admis par le fédéral et de la situation économique.

Immigration temporaire

En matière d’immigration temporaire, il est prévu de réduire le nombre de résidents non permanents « en visant à terme un nombre maximal de 65 000 titulaires de permis dans le Programme des travailleurs étrangers temporaires (PTET), 110 000 titulaires de permis dans le Programme des étudiants étrangers (PÉE), ce qui représente une réduction globale de 13 % par rapport à 2024 ».

Les travailleurs étrangers temporaires « qui ont séjourné plus de trois ans au Québec de façon continue ou cumulative » devront à l’avenir démontrer une certaine connaissance du français oral.

« Des exemptions sont prévues pour les [travailleurs] agricoles, en raison de leur contribution active à la sécurité alimentaire, les ressortissants étrangers occupant un emploi pour le compte d’un bureau d’une division politique d’un État étranger […] et les employés des organisations internationales non gouvernementales reconnues par le Québec, car celles-ci bénéficient de certaines exemptions aux obligations de la Charte de la langue française », explique le gouvernement.

Autrement, « les vérifications de la connaissance du français débuteront le 17 décembre 2028 ».

La fin du PEQ

Autre importante décision du gouvernement Legault : le populaire Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ), qui a été suspendu en octobre 2024, est officiellement aboli. La forte popularité du programme, pour lequel les admissions étaient en continu et sans plafond, faisait en sorte que les cibles d’immigration du gouvernement étaient dépassées. La voie rapide pour obtenir la résidence permanente devient désormais le Programme de sélection des travailleurs qualifiés (PSTQ).

Par contre, « toutes les demandes présentées avant la fin [du PEQ] seront traitées […] et le ministère continuera de recevoir et de traiter les demandes » jusqu’au 19 novembre prochain.

« Avec la réduction des seuils d’admission et la nécessité de renforcer l’efficacité de l’État, la coexistence de plusieurs programmes destinés aux travailleurs qualifiés n’est plus pertinente », justifie Québec.

Le gouvernement prolonge également jusqu’au 31 décembre 2026 la suspension de certaines demandes au Programme des travailleurs étrangers temporaires (PTET) pour les régions de Montréal et de Laval seulement. Québec affirme vouloir ainsi « freiner l’augmentation du nombre de résidents non permanents [RNP] dans les deux régions où le bassin de main-d’œuvre disponible est plus important, tout comme les défis reliés à la pérennité du français »….

Source: Québec prévoit accueillir 45 000 immigrants permanents par année

La Presse take on federal plan:

Est-ce un changement de philosophie ?

Oui. Le Canada passe d’une logique de croissance démographique rapide à une approche de croissance maîtrisée et sélective. Le discours du budget lie désormais immigration, productivité, souveraineté économique et sécurité nationale. « C’était une erreur de monter à 500 000 immigrants permanents au cours des deux dernières années. C’est ce qui a créé une certaine déstabilisation », explique Me Patrice Brunet, qui se spécialise dans l’immigration.

Qu’en est-il de l’immigration francophone hors Québec ?

Ottawa fixe une cible de 10,5 % de résidents permanents francophones établis à l’extérieur du Québec d’ici 2028, contre 9 % en 2026. Le gouvernement mise sur un recrutement accru dans les pays d’Afrique francophone et sur l’élargissement des services d’accueil et d’intégration en français.

Source: Ottawa entreprend un virage majeur

Filed under Immigration Tagged with ,

Trump Immigration Rule Could Make H-1B Visa Holders Too Costly To Hire

2025/11/07 Leave a comment

Of note. May make Canada relatively more attractive:

The Trump administration will publish a new immigration rule expected to price many H-1B visa holders and employment-based immigrants out of the U.S. labor market. The White House included the plan in the proclamation announcing a $100,000 fee on many H-1B visa holders. The new Department of Labor rule will likely be similar to the two attempts in Donald Trump’s first term to raise the salaries of high-skilled foreign nationals beyond what most employers can afford to pay. A significant body of research indicates that H-1B visa holders are paid the same or higher salaries than U.S. workers with comparable levels of education and experience.

H-1B temporary visas are often the only way for high-skilled foreign nationals to work in the United States long term. When companies recruit at U.S. universities, they find that international students account for 73% of full-time graduate students in electrical and computer engineering. The H-1B annual limit is 65,000, with an exemption of 20,000 for individuals with master’s degrees or higher from a U.S. university, or about 0.05% of the U.S. labor force. In addition to government fees that can exceed $6,000, employers must pay the higher of the actual or prevailing wage paid to U.S. professionals with similar experience and qualifications. 

An Immigration Directive To Make H-1B Visa Holders Too Expensive To Employ

Trump administration officials understood that the $100,000 fee to hire new H-1B visa holders contained in the Sept. 19 presidential proclamation would be prohibitive for employers, effectively blocking many high-skilled foreign nationals from ever working in the United States. They also knew it could not stop all H-1B professionals because the relevant section of U.S. law only allowed the proclamation to prevent the “entry” of H-1B professionals…

Source: Trump Immigration Rule Could Make H-1B Visa Holders Too Costly To Hire

Filed under Immigration, Trump administration Tagged with , ,

ChatGPT summary of reactions to immigration section of Budget 2025

2025/11/06 Leave a comment

Reasonable summary (still going through the old way as well):

Nice — here’s a compact, source-backed briefing on reactions to the immigration measures in Canada’s 2025 federal budget, organized by the sub-sections you asked for.

Quick framing: the Budget and accompanying 2026–28 Immigration Levels Plan signal sizeable reductions in temporary resident targets (including international students and temporary foreign workers) and cuts to some refugee resettlement streams. Those policy choices are driving the reactions summarized below. (Budget Canada)

Media commentary

  • Overall tone: widespread note of political risk and policy reset — most national outlets frame the changes as a significant scaling back from the high post-pandemic targets and stress both the political logic (housing, service pressure) and economic trade-offs (labour supply). (Global News)
  • Coverage highlights the scale of reductions: reporters emphasize steep drops in international student arrivals (roughly 60% lower in 2025 vs 2024) and large cuts to temporary worker targets. Coverage also flags the government’s claim that arrivals and asylum claims have already fallen this year. (Budget Canada)
  • Some outlets place the budget in an election-cycle context — discussing short-term political calculations vs longer-term economic impact. (Global News)

Business reaction

  • Broad concern from employer and industry groups that lower targets will worsen labour shortages in key sectors (hospitality, restaurants, health care, construction, seasonal work). Many business groups warn the rollbacks send negative signals to investors and could constrain growth. (HCAMag)
  • Sector example: Restaurants Canada called the reductions “incredibly concerning,” pointing to a fall in temporary resident admissions from ~673,650 (2025 baseline) to ~370,000 by 2027 and warned of staffing crises for foodservice. (Restaurants Canada)
  • Some business commentators acknowledge the government’s stated goals (relief on housing and services) but emphasize that tightening labour supply may raise costs and reduce capacity for many SMEs. (HCAMag)

Provincial reactions

  • Mixed responses across provinces: jurisdictions with tight housing/health pressures (and those with political sensitivity on immigration) publicly welcomed the “sustainable” framing, while labour-short provinces and municipalities expressed alarm about workforce impacts. Local leaders in some cities framed the budget as a cautious “sign of confidence” for fiscal matters but cautiously noted labour impacts. (Global News)
  • Provinces that rely heavily on international students and temporary workers (e.g., provinces with big post-secondary or seasonal industries) have highlighted immediate operational concerns for employers, colleges, and municipalities. (Provincial press releases and municipal reaction pieces stress localized impacts.) (Global News)

Education sector

  • Strong, largely negative reaction from universities and college leaders: cuts to international study-permit targets are described as “alarming” and “deep” (reports indicate new international student arrivals were roughly 60% lower in 2025 vs 2024), creating immediate financial and operational stress for institutions and student supports. (University Affairs)
  • Association and sector commentaries note the budget also funds research recruitment (~$1.7B referenced in sector analysis) — so while research investment is welcomed, the near-term loss of fee revenue and campus diversity from fewer international students is a major concern. (University Affairs)

NGOs / civil society

  • Refugee and migrant advocacy groups are highly critical: NGOs (including Migrant Rights Network and the Canadian Council for Refugees) flag sharp cuts to refugee resettlement slots (e.g., big reductions in privately sponsored and government-assisted refugee allocations for 2026) and warn of humanitarian consequences. They also criticise proposed changes that would increase costs/limits on refugee healthcare supports. (Migrant Rights Network)
  • NGOs frame the budget as reversing prior resettlement commitments and argue the cuts are out of step with global resettlement needs; several are calling for immediate policy reversals or mitigations. (Canadian Council for Refugees)

Key numbers & facts (short)

  • Government/ Budget document: says temporary foreign worker arrivals have already fallen ~50% this year and international student arrivals roughly 60% lower so far in 2025; asylum claims down ~1/3. (Government emphasizes “restoring control” / “sustainable levels”.) (Budget Canada)
  • Industry claim (Restaurants Canada): temporary resident admissions projected to fall from ~673,650 in 2025 to ~370,000 by 2027 (sector-level alarm). (Restaurants Canada)
  • NGOs: significant cuts in refugee streams (e.g., privately sponsored refugees from 23,000 in 2025 → 16,000 in 2026; government-assisted refugees reduced to ~13,250 in 2026 in some NGO tallies). (Canadian Council for Refugees)

Overall read / implications

  • Short term: a mix of political kudos for addressing housing/service pressures and immediate pushback from business, post-secondary institutions, and refugee advocates about labour, revenue and humanitarian impacts. (Global News)
  • Medium term risk: continued sectoral labour shortfalls, reduced international-education revenues for campuses and communities, and reputational/humanitarian questions from refugee/NGO communities unless mitigations are introduced. (HCAMag)

Which do you want next?

Filed under Immigration Tagged with ,

Indian students rejected the most for international student permits in Canada

2025/11/06 Leave a comment

Given most of the growth has been from India, the extent of college recruitment in particular and the examples of fraud, not that surprising:

…For the second year in a row, Canada cut the number of international student permits in order to bring down the number of temporary migrants and to deal with fraudulent applications.

As a result, about 74% of Indian students applying to study at Canadian colleges and universities were rejected in August — a big increase compared to about 32% in August 2023, says Reuters, which was provided with immigration department data.

Indian applicants also dropped from 20,900 in August 2023, when they represented just over one-quarter of all applicants, to 4,515 in August.

During the past 10 years, India has been Canada’s top source of international students and in August,  it also had the highest study-permit refusal rate of any country with more than 1,000 approved applicants….

Source: Indian students rejected the most for international student permits in Canada

Filed under Immigration Tagged with , ,

Ottawa seeking mass visa cancellation powers to deter fraud from India: internal documents

2025/11/05 Leave a comment

Useful info to better understand the policy rationale:

The federal government is seeking the power to cancel applications for groups of visa holders at least in part due to concerns of fraud from India and Bangladesh, according to internal documents obtained by CBC News.

A departmental presentation to the immigration minister’s office said that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and unnamed U.S. partners are aiming to identify and cancel fraudulent visitor visa applications.

The Canadian entities and U.S. partners formed a working group looking to beef up authorities to refuse and cancel visas, according to the presentation, which singled out India and Bangladesh as “country-specific challenges.”

A section explaining how mass cancellation powers could be used listed hypothetical scenarios such as a pandemic, war and “country-specific visa holders.”

Publicly, Immigration Minister Lena Diab has listed a pandemic or war as why the government is seeking these powers, but has not mentioned country-specific visa holders. 

The presentation provides a further glimpse into Ottawa’s motivation for gaining those mass cancellation powers.

The provision was tabled in Parliament as part of Bill C-2, the government’s sweeping border legislation. That bill has since been spun off into two pieces, with mass visa cancellation folded into C-12, which the government is hoping  to quickly pass.

More than 300 civil society groups have raised concerns over the legislation. Some, such as the Migrant Rights Network, say group cancellations would give the government the ability to set up a “mass deportation machine.” 

Immigration lawyers have also wondered if the mass cancellation ability was being sought to allow the federal government to reduce its growing backlog of applications. 

Asylum claims from Indian nationals increased from fewer than 500 a month in May 2023 to about 2,000 by July 2024, the document said. 

The presentation says that verifying temporary resident visa applications from India slows down application processing.

It said processing time rose from an average of 30 days at the end of July 2023 to 54 a year later. It said approvals also started to decline in 2024 as it committed more resources to verification, from more than 63,000 in January to about 48,000 in June.

The presentation also noted a rise in “no boards” in India — passengers not allowed to board airplanes — as of the summer of 2024. By July 31 of that year 1,873 applicants had been identified for further questioning and sent procedural fairness letters outlining their rights and potential legal recourse.

No data about claims from Bangladesh was provided in the document. 

Last month, IRCC told CBC News in a statement that new powers were not being proposed “with a specific group of people or situation in mind,” and that “decisions would not be taken unilaterally.”

A separate document from October 2024, a memorandum to then immigration minister Marc Miller, urged him to push for the department to be given extra visa cancellation powers without naming any individual countries.

“The ability to cancel temporary resident documents reduces security risks and limits potential misuse of such documents,” it noted.

The memo also said that the risk of applicants seeking judicial review of the cancellations would “depend on the particular facts of each case, notably whether procedural fairness was followed.” …

Source: Ottawa seeking mass visa cancellation powers to deter fraud from India: internal documents

Filed under Immigration Tagged with , ,

Universities may jump to hire foreign researchers if Ottawa allocates funds

2025/11/05 Leave a comment

Pre-budget messaging or lobbying?

Canadian universities expect to be able to move quickly to hire researchers from abroad if the federal government announces new money to attract top scientists in the coming budget.

Universities have been waiting to see what direction the federal government will take as other countries have jumped on the potential hiring opportunity created by recent instability in U.S. academic funding.

Two major proposals to enhance Canada’s scientific capacity have been up for government consideration for several months. One was designed by Quebec’s leading research universities. The other was led by former governor-general David Johnston, Eddie Goldenberg, who was chief of staff to Jean Chrétien, and Alan Bernstein, the former president of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. 

Other jurisdictions, starting with France and the European Union, announced plans several months ago to tempt researchers with financial incentives….

Source: Universities may jump to hire foreign researchers if Ottawa allocates funds

Filed under Immigration Tagged with ,

Briefing: The Public Mood Before Budget Day (Abacus, immigration)

2025/11/04 Leave a comment

More from Abacus on immigration where concerns are more about capacity than culture or values:,

4. Immigration: Skepticism steady, focus on capacity

Views on immigration (new Abacus poll) have barely shifted since last year: 49% negative, 26% positive, 26% neutral. The concerns aren’t cultural, they’re about capacity.

Majorities still say immigration worsens housing (69%) and strains healthcare (around 60%), but opposition has softened slightly as the government lowers targets (67% now say “too high,” down from 72%).

Younger Canadians and Liberal supporters are more likely to see the upside — addressing labour gaps, supporting growth — while skepticism remains strongest in the Prairies and among Conservative voters.

The message: Canadians don’t want the gates closed, they want the system to work.

Source: Briefing: The Public Mood Before Budget Day

Filed under Immigration, Polling Tagged with

Majority of Canadians say immigration level still too high, but confidence growing in Carney fixing ‘broken’ system: Poll

2025/11/04 Leave a comment

Of note:

The Liberal party has restored some Canadians’ confidence in its ability to manage immigration, though a majority still believe the Conservatives are better equipped to fix the beleaguered system, according to a new poll.

A year after implementing some seismic policy changes to reduce immigration intakes, the Liberals are closing the gap with the opposition Conservatives in public perception of their ability to handle a system what many view as “broken,” said the Abacus Data survey, published on the eve of the release of Ottawa’s 2026-28 immigration levels plan on Tuesday.

Overall, 38 per cent of Canadians favoured the Conservatives to stickhandle this issue, compared to 29 per cent for the Liberals. However, the Liberals’ score has risen 13 percentage points on that question in the past year while those expressing confidence in the Conservatives only grew by four percentage points, said the poll for the Toronto Star.

“It does show how much (former prime minister Justin) Trudeau affected people’s perceptions,” said David Coletto, Abacus chair and CEO. “Now that he’s gone and the government has continued to follow through on that more restrictive immigration policy, they’ve kind of returned to more of a normal place.” Liberal Mark Carney became prime minister in March.

Rapid population growth as a result of high immigration dominated political debates over the last two years, and public concerns about lagging housing, health care and other social services have prompted the Liberal government to make drastic cuts in the admissions of both permanent and temporary residents, including foreign students and workers. Immigration applicants are also faced with backlogs and long processing times.

While 49 per cent of Canadians — virtually unchanged from 50 per cent last November — continue to view immigration through a negative lens, attitudes have largely stabilized, said Coletto, with 26 per cent of people expressing positive feelings toward immigration in Canada. 

Sentiment remains most negative among older Canadians and Conservative voters, while younger Canadians and Liberal supporters are more positive about immigration. Despite the lower permanent resident intake from 500,000 in 2024 to 385,000 this year, 67 per cent of people still said the target is too high; that percentage was down modestly from 72 per cent a year ago.

“Heading into a budget that will set a new immigration plan, the government is navigating a delicate balance,” said Coletto. “Canadians continue to see immigration through the lens of scarcity — too few homes, too much strain on public services, and a labour market that feels stretched. The public pressure is clearly on restraint, not expansion.”…

Source: Majority of Canadians say immigration level still too high, but confidence growing in Carney fixing ‘broken’ system: Poll

Filed under Immigration, Polling Tagged with

Former immigration minister [Miller] rejected officials’ advice to shelve Sudan humanitarian program

2025/11/04 Leave a comment

Of note, classic case of balancing general objectives with the specific:

Immigration officials advised shelving a special humanitarian program, designed to help Sudanese Canadians bring family members here to escape civil war in the African country, over concerns that plans to reduce immigration could be undermined, sources say.

The officials argued that bringing in Sudanese could affect the government’s immigration levels plan: annual targets that the government sets for the number of permanent and temporary residents it plans to admit.

But former immigration minister Marc Miller, two sources say, last year rejected that argument as he thought Canada should help family members of Canadians caught up in what has been described as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. He pressed ahead with establishing a pathway to permanent residence for those with direct family ties to Sudanese Canadians, although processing delays have left thousands who applied stranded. Mr. Miller declined to comment. …

Source: Former immigration minister rejected officials’ advice to shelve Sudan humanitarian program

Filed under Immigration, Refugees Tagged with ,

A New Era of Immigration Enforcement Unfolds in the U.S. Interior and at the Border under Trump 2.0

2025/11/03 Leave a comment

Another good analysis by MPI:

Unauthorized migration at the U.S.-Mexico border plunged dramatically during the just-ended fiscal year, as the Trump administration leveraged new border controls, further asylum restrictions, and the promise of mass deportations, reaching about 444,000 migrant encounters recorded in fiscal year (FY) 2025. This sharp drop from 2.1 million encounters the prior year was also marked by reversion to a pattern last experienced more than a decade ago: Flows primarily composed of Mexican single adults and Central American unaccompanied children.

The steep decrease in unauthorized arrivals at the border and return to nationalities that are easier to turn back because of existing repatriation agreements has permitted the administration to direct its focus to immigration enforcement in the U.S. interior—in fact deploying significant U.S. Border Patrol assets to cities such as Los Angeles and Chicago. To achieve its goal of mass deportations, the administration has increased coordination among federal agencies, elevated cooperation with state and local law enforcement agencies, rapidly accelerated the build-up of detention capacity, expanded the use of fast-track removal powers, tapped the U.S. military, and established new agreements to repatriate returnees to third countries. As a result, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recorded more deportations from within U.S. communities during FY 2025 than the Border Patrol apprehended people crossing the Southwest border illegally—the first time since at least FY 2014, according to available data.

While detailed FY 2025 data about ICE arrests and removals have not been released since January, there is no doubt that interior enforcement has risen. But it has become increasingly complicated to track results because only selective statistics have been made public. Returning to regular reporting of detailed data on immigration enforcement across the various Department of Homeland Security (DHS) immigration agencies could not only improve the public’s understanding of current immigration enforcement activities but also inform state and local stakeholders who want to collaborate or who are affected by enforcement.

Ramped-Up Interior Enforcement and Mass Deportations

While U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) continues to post border encounter statistics every month, DHS has inconsistently released immigration enforcement data  and its last detailed tables of ICE and CBP actions ended with November 2024 activity. Based on the latest publicly available figures, however, the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) estimates that ICE conducted about 340,000 deportations in FY 2025, including noncitizens with a formal order of removal and immigration detainees who chose to end their detention with a voluntary departure. This would mark a level of activity 25 percent higher than the 271,000 deportations recorded by ICE in FY 2024. These fiscal year figures do not include deportations conducted by CBP, which DHS has yet to release.

The  administration says it conducted more than 400,000 deportations overall between ICE and CBP in its first 250 days, and was on pace to reach nearly 600,000 by the end of its first year. This projection falls short of the 685,000 deportations recorded by the Biden administration in FY 2024—and is well off the Trump administration’s pledge of carrying out 1 million deportations per year.

Location Matters

Where the deportations are happening is significantly different under the Trump administration, with more occurring within the U.S. interior rather than at the border. This has significant operational impacts, given deportations in the interior are likely to be far more resource intensive and carry higher individual and societal costs with enforcement happening in U.S. cities and against people who, unlike many recent border crossers, often have significant years of U.S. residence and deep community ties.

Of the 400,000 deportations conducted by the Trump administration through its first 250 days, MPI estimates approximately 234,000 were conducted by ICE from the U.S. interior, with another 166,000 by CBP.

ICE daily deportations, in fact, doubled from 600 in January to 1,200 since June. ICE deportations have increased as the number of immigrants being placed in detention centers has surged. Since the start of the Trump administration, the average number of noncitizens in ICE detention centers has grown gradually, reaching about 60,000 by the end of FY 2025 (see Figure 1). And by March, most detainees had been arrested by ICE in the interior, not by CBP at the border or through CBP transfer to ICE, as was usually the case under the Biden administration….

Source: A New Era of Immigration Enforcement Unfolds in the U.S. Interior and at the Border under Trump 2.0

Filed under Immigration, Trump administration Tagged with ,

← Older posts

Newer posts →