From census to wireless, a lesson in intransigence – The Globe and Mail

Jeffrey Simpson on the Census. Perhaps the best or worst example of a decision driven by ideology.

From census to wireless, a lesson in intransigence – The Globe and Mail.

What the National Household Survey can’t tell us – Beyond The Commons, Capital Read – Macleans.ca

A reminder of just what we have lost in terms of reliable, consistent data with the cancellation of the mandatory census, this time in relation to the National Household Survey. Bad or no data leads to bad decisions, an example of a decision driven by ideology rather than common sense.

What the National Household Survey can’t tell us – Beyond The Commons, Capital Read – Macleans.ca.

The access-to-information system is busting: information czar – National | Globalnews.ca

A systemic issue for the government, one that undermines government accountability to citizens.

My own experience under the Access to Information Act only confirms that the system is broken and unable to meet its statutory obligations. Will post a log shortly on the delays, obfuscation and excuses used in not fulfilling a legitimate ATIP request.

Not a high point for the government.

The access-to-information system is busting: information czar – National | Globalnews.ca.

Book Launch Announcement in The Hill Times

Along with other ‘Heard on the Hill’ items, a good pre-article about my book Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias (half-way down the first page). The Hill Times main audience are political staffers, officials who need to follow the politics, and the journalists who cover the hill.

Should generate some interest. Full article below given pay wall:

Former top bureaucrat Griffith to release provocative new book, Policy Arrogance, on Sept. 23 at Three Brewers on Sparks Street

Six years ago, Andrew Griffith, a director general at the Canadian Heritage department, received a call from then-secretary of state for Multiculturalism Jason Kenney asking him why he had not approved language that was to be sent out in a press release. He replied, “But minister, it doesn’t sound ministerial.”

It was a late afternoon on a Friday and his first day on the job. He says in his new book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism, he spent the weekend wondering if he was still employed.

“I survived, and went on to work with him and his staff for close to four years, first at Canadian Heritage and then at Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), following the transfer of the multicultural program to CIC in October 2008 after Kenney’s appointment as Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism,” he wrote in the preface to Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias. “During this period, citizenship (added to my responsibilities at CIC) and multiculturalism policies and programs were fundamentally reset, in line with the government’s emphasis on more meaningful citizenship and more integrative multiculturalism.”

Mr. Griffith, who is launching his book on Sept. 23 in Ottawa, said that Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias is a small case study about how the public service had to readjust to policy-making following the federal Conservatives’ rise to power. He said public servants had to “become more modest about the degree of expertise and knowledge” it provided to their political masters, “forced by the radically different perspective that the Harper government and Minister Kenney brought to these inherently complex social policy issues.”

In addition, Mr. Griffith wrote, “It is also the story of how officials balanced the public service challenge function role of ‘fearless advice’ with the need to serve the government of the day through ‘loyal implementation.’ Given the sharp nature of the policy reset, and the entrenched views of many public servants, this book aims to provide a small case study of how public servants adjusted to the new reality—one in which their expertise was fundamentally challenged, discounted, and at times ignored.”

The changes to policy making were so fundamental, Mr. Griffith said, that “In many cases, officials had to work through the Kübler-Ross stages of grief and loss—denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance—in dealing with the traumatic challenge to their role, as well as to the long-standing consensus between previous Liberal and Conservative parties on citizenship and multiculturalism issues.”

He called this period “an intense and interesting time of policy change and political-bureaucratic interface challenges.”

The book launch takes place on Sept. 23 at The Three Brewers, 240 Sparks St., from 5 to 7 p.m.

Fight Club, anyone? Hill Times, Embassy, and GCTC start Friday Night Fights | hilltimes.com.

Release of government documents backlogged

My own experience with ATIP reveals a similar lack of compliance with the statutory requirements of the Act. Not a good example of government accountability or transparency.

Release of government documents backlogged.

Professional and Non Partisan Thoughts on Renewing the Public Service: Impossible Conversations – The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government

Some good discussion on the hard issues in the public service on  Nick Charney’s CPS Renewal blog. Picks up on some of the issues that I raise in my book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism, with some good comments about just how hard they are to weave into our daily work.

Professional and Non Partisan Thoughts on Renewing the Public Service: Impossible Conversations – The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir

In what can only be seen as playing to xenophobic tendencies, inspriré à la française, the Parti Québecois’s leaked proposal for a Charter of Quebec Values, that would exclude any government employee in any function (e.g., hospitals, schools, garbage collection, the list is endless) from wearing any religious sign. Laicisme extrème.

Rather than addressing the political reality of Quebec feelings of vulnerability through the more nuanced approach of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission’s laïcité ouverte (see Rapport Bouchard-Taylor – Pourquoi la laïcité ouverte ? | Le Devoir) , where the only those government posts where government neutrality must be explicit (e.g., law enforcement, judges, President of the Assemblée national), the PQ went for an exclusionary, divisive approach.

Encouragingly, whether it was a trial balloon, all opposition parties in the Assemblée nationale have spoken against it as have many Quebec commentators (in English Canada, when we poll people about comfort level with religious signs, discomfort increases with the degree of religiosity expressed, but people have largely come to terms with this as part of living in a diverse society). Expect of course that other views will also come out, as is normal in any public debate, and we shall see whether the PQ succeeds in making this a wedge issue.

And of course, no such law would survive challenge under any human rights legislation in Quebec or Canada, not to mention the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Lots written on this and a selection of articles below for those interested.

Charte des valeurs québécoises – ​Une fuite mal reçue | Le Devoir.

 Opinion Quebec’s Putinesque idea to ban religious garb from public workplaces – Globe and Mail

Échecs identitaires La rentrée promet un retour en force de nos chicanes habituelles. Et la chicane la plus attendue est certainement le débat sur les «valeurs québécoises», Actualité

Turbans, kippas and crucifixes could be banned in Quebec public institutions under PQ proposal, National Post

L’interdiction des symboles religieux serait une erreur, selon Charles Taylor, La Presse

Turbans, hijabs, kippas face restrictions in Quebec, Macleans

And then there were 2… multiculturalism ministers on the cabinet roster – Inside Politics

More from Kady O’Malley on her series ‘would the real Minister for Multiculturalism please stand up’. I think in practice it will be less confusing for outside observers as Minister Kenney will be the main public face of multiculturalism and is clearly the senior political minister. Officials will adjust as they must, the focus of the program will be political, given the importance of ethnic communities as the ‘fourth sister’ of electoral strategies.

Not elegant from a machinery of government perspective but a totally understandable and rational, from a political perspective decision (even if the former official in me groans about what it means for the long-term health of the multiculturalism program).

And then there were 2… multiculturalism ministers on the cabinet roster – Inside Politics.

What We Don’t Know Can’t Hurt Us (Right?) | The Census Project Blog

A bit tongue-in-cheek on the US Census debates. Orwellian “ignorance is strength”.

What We Don’t Know Can’t Hurt Us (Right?) | The Census Project Blog.

My Book – Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Printing Proof Stage

Just finished the final edits – substantive, copy and formatting. On track for September 16 release. Good feeling, now on to pre-production and marketing.