Sheema Khan: We can end honour killings, but not with films by anti-Muslim zealots

Sheema Khan’s reasonable approach on how best, and how not to, address gender issues, including “honour-based” violence.

Barbara Kay (Suffering caused by honour tell tales that smite the heart) and Margaret Wente (Don’t ignore women’s struggles in the Muslim world) would  do well to reflect further on Sheema’s points, as well as those of Amy Awad (Don’t Separate ‘Honour Crimes’ From Other Violence Against Women).

While much of Sheema’s piece is largely on the motives of Clarion Project (the organization behind Honor Diaries, Iranium, Obsession, and The Third Jihad), it is more her positive formulation on how best to counter “honour-based” violence that is of interest:

For those who want to help eliminate “honour”-based violence (HBV), a good place to start is through in-depth research about the issue. Next is consultation with those who have first-hand expertise in the field and credibility with affected communities. Aruna Papp, a South Asian Christian, has survived the trauma of “shame”, and is one of this country’s leading experts. In London, Ont., the Muslim Resource Centre for Social Support and Integration recently launched the “Reclaim Honour Project” that “works to promote honour and prevent violence against girls and women through the support of the community.” In March, the Ottawa Police Service held a collaborative session with local communities to address HBV, with expert Rana Husseini. Ms. Husseini, a Jordanian-based journalist, has over twenty years’ experience in the field. She advised: “never denigrate a people’s faith or culture,” but rather, protect at-risk women, create safe spaces to raise the issue, and work patiently to change laws and attitudes. The absence of Ms. Husseini’s approach in Honour Diaries speaks volumes.

We can look to the recent successes against female genital mutilation in sub-Saharan Africa as an example of how to approach centuries-rooted traditions. The key drivers include community dialogue and education, health-based initiatives, alternative income for cutters, legislative reform, and the involvement of religious clergy whose moral authority has undercut cultural legitimacy of genital mutilation.

Religion is an ally against “honour” killings. Islamic scholars (both Sunni and Shia) have condemned this practice. Their voices need to be amplified, in order to remove any doubts about the immoral nature of this crime. They carry far more legitimacy than anti-Muslim propagandists. But then again, eradicating honour killings was never the goal of Honor Diaries.

We can end honour killings, but not with films by anti-Muslim zealots – The Globe and Mail.

Don’t Separate ‘Honour Crimes’ From Other Violence Against Women | Amy Awad

Legitimate criticism of the focus on “honour crimes” without any linkage to overall violence against women by Amy Awad of NCCM:

There are thoughtful and effective ways to look at all the facets of violence against women and it can certainly be done without promoting bigotry. For example, in March, the Ottawa Police, the Ottawa Rape Crisis, and Algonquin College partnered to put on a full day event on violence in the name of honour. The event brought together a broad section of Ottawa professionals as well as religious leaders and community activists focused on developing effective community-based strategies in Ottawa for preventing violence in the name of honour.

With thoughtful discussion about definitions, causes, strategies, and yes, choosing the words we use, all participants felt welcome and were able to come up with first steps that can be taken to address these problems. Their concrete proposals included prevention strategies, early intervention and accurate data collection.

Contrast this with Honour Diaries that presents some of the most egregious examples of gendered violence and then almost entirely attributes the problem to Islam. Instead of offering real solutions based on facts, the documentary will very likely result in promulgating fear of the ‘other’ and promote hatred against Muslims who are falsely portrayed as holding the exclusive franchise on this scourge.

A more nuanced approach than Barbara Kay (Suffering caused by honour tell tales that smite the heart) and Margaret Wente (Don’t ignore women’s struggles in the Muslim world).

Don’t Separate ‘Honour Crimes’ From Other Violence Against Women | Amy Awad.

More commentary on Quebec elections

Starting with Gilles Duceppe, former leader of the Bloq québécois, the sovereignist party that imploded in the 2011 federal election:

Plusieurs parlent déjà de course au leadership, mais cela serait une grave erreur de tenter de choisir un sauveur sans se poser d’importantes questions sur les objectifs du parti, sans définir une stratégie claire et sans se demander si un changement de garde ne s’impose pas en considérant que le PQ a perdu beaucoup d’attrait auprès des jeunes.

Quelques observations au lendemain d’une défaite | Gilles Duceppe.

Justin Trudeau stating the obvious but what some pundits overlook:

En point de presse ce matin à Ottawa, M. Trudeau a soutenu qu’il y aura toujours des Québécois qui prôneront l’option souverainiste. Les fédéralistes feraient donc une erreur de croire que ce mouvement est à l’agonie.

« Il ne faut pas dire cela (que le mouvement souverainiste est mort). Il faut reconnaître qu’il y a des gens qui vont demeurer passionnément souverainistes.  Mais les Québécois se sont exprimés. Même une partie des Québécois souverainistes ont dit qu’ils veulent de la stabilité, qu’ils veulent une économie en santé d’abord et avant tout. J’ai confiance que c’est ce que nous allons avoir pour les prochaines années », a dit M. Trudeau.

Le mouvement souverainiste n’est pas mort, prévient Trudeau

Barbara Kay on the five lessons. Not sure that this is a “triumph” for PM Harper although he, along with other federal leaders, handled it well be staying out and letting the PQ implode on its own. But it is a relief to be spared national unity debates for 4 years, although some issues will continue to arise:

Could it be sweeter that Marois lost her own riding, and that she had to wait to the very last moment to know if she had won or lost, it was that close? Could it be more appropriate that Péladeau should have won his riding, so he has no excuse to walk away from the mess he created, and now must serve his four years with no power and no honour? He hasn’t a hope in hell of being awarded the leadership of the PQ. Gives new depth of meaning to the old saying, “hoist by his own petard.”

Five takeaways from a brutal Parti Québécois defeat

Another “takeaways” piece by Tu Thanh Ha in the Globe:

And in the quasi-referendum campaign that just ended, Quebeckers again sent a clear signal that they didn’t want to hear about the PQ’s raison d’être.

The PQ’s leadership is now open for contest but the problem of such contests is that they start with an audience of the converted, especially in an ideological party like the PQ.

The three pretenders’ eagerness to profess their sovereigntist credentials was necessary, but it struck outsiders as awkward – a reminder of the very reason why some voters are turned off by the PQ.

“The body wasn’t even cold,” veteran TV commentator Jean Lapierre quipped.

 Three reasons the PQ lost, and Couillard’s biggest challenge 

And an interesting eloge on Pauline Marois by Jean-François Lisée, former PQ Minister responsible for Montreal (where the PQ also had disastrous results) which may be tactical as he is one of the contenders to replace Marois:

Alors tu peux prendre tes quartiers de printemps avec le sentiment — non, pas le sentiment, la certitude — du devoir accompli. De la fidélité à tes convictions. Tu laisses derrière toi une équipe formidable. Trente députés que tu as choisis et qui t’ont choisie. Une base militante que tu as reformée et ressoudée. Malgré la défaite: le plus grand parti au Québec avec 90 000 membres et un financement populaire inégalé.

Il y a du ressort, dans cette défaite. Le ressort que tu as mis en nous. Il y aura beaucoup d’introspection à faire, dans les semaines et les mois qui viennent. Il y aura du découragement, des débats, des mauvaises humeurs. Puis le sens des recommencements, des consensus, des choix, de l’action.

Ce ne sera pas facile. Mais si nous avons le centième de ta sagesse et de ton courage, nous franchirons ces étapes en nous nourrissant de l’exemple que tu nous as donné toute ta vie durant.

Repose-toi, Pauline. Très chère Pauline. Tu l’as bien mérité. Nous t’emportons avec nous, tu fais partie de nous, dès maintenant et pour très longtemps.

Perhaps the necessary kind words before the PQ undertakes the serious reflection needed following its lowest share of the popular vote since 1970. And possible self-serving given his role in the campaign and related strategy.

Très chère Pauline

Barbara Kay: Suffering caused by honour tell tales that smite the heart | National Post

On the film, Honour Diaries, and Barbara Kay’s commentary. Some may be uncomfortable talking about “honour killings” but I think it is fewer than Kay asserts. Despite some previous musings within the government of the possible need for special legislation against honour killings, existing laws have proven adequate to punish those guilty of murder (e.g., Shafia and Parvez cases):

The lives of girls and women are held cheap in many regions dominated by the Hindu and Sikh religions, but nine out of 10 of the countries with the worst gender-rights disparities are Islam-dominated, according to the World Economic Forum. There is no evading that elephant in the room, and the women in this film gamely attempt to address it head-on. But the subject needs a film in itself.

Many people, and feminists in particular, feel it is racist to judge the gender practices of other cultures, preferring to dwell on the perceived deficits in our own. They must get over that, as all the women in the film agree. Canadian women viewers will walk out of this film feeling as I did: There but for the grace of cultural accident go I.

Barbara Kay: Suffering caused by honour tell tales that smite the heart | National Post.

Some background on the directors and producers of the movie, which doesn’t necessarily detract from the messages of the film (but makes it easier for people to discard them):

Clarion Project as “a nonprofit organization dedicated to exposing the dangers of Islamic extremism, while providing a platform for the voices of moderation. [Executive producer] Shore’s previous films include the award-winning documentary ‘Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,’ ‘The Third Jihad: Radical Islam’s Vision for America,’ and ‘Iranium.'”

Film wages ‘interfaith campaign’ against abuse of Muslim women

Barbara Kay: Banning hijabs won’t halt honour killings

A good piece by Barbara Kay on the recent report by Quebec’s Status of Women Committee on honour killings and the lack of linkage to the wearing or not of religious headgear like the hijab.

If the Quebec government believes that the forced removal of a hijab will mitigate against centuries of a cultural tradition so strong that people prefer a lifetime in jail rather than tolerate what we would call normal female autonomy, they are dreaming in technicolour. Quebec’s Status of Women report treats a serious subject with the concern, objectivity, ideological neutrality and earnestness it deserves. The Quebec government has no business exploiting the good faith of its writers and the tragic deaths of innocent girls and women to further its secularist agenda.

Barbara Kay: Banning hijabs won’t halt honour killings | National Post.

National character on parade | National Post

Nice to see a columnist like Barbara Kay in the National Post taking a broad view across religions on the role and portrayal of women. Far too rare, and the issue is broader than the niqab. While I do not agree with the overall French approach to dress codes of banning in all places, nevertheless reminding that these issues are not particular to one religion, one age group, one particular dress code, is helpful.

National character on parade | National Post.