Tasha Kheiriddin: Pierre Poilievre’s deportation gamble

Good take:

….Here’s the rub. Yes, it is unfair that refugees can access benefits unavailable to Canadian citizens. Why should asylum claimants get discount supplemental health care when millions of Canadians are lining up at food banks? Why should criminals get lower sentences, remain in the country, and get health care on the taxpayer’s dime? These things are wrong and must be remedied.

But as with most things in politics, communications matters. Timing and framing can decide whether an issue gets resolved or simply serves as an occasion to grandstand. And in the current case, I fear it’s the latter.

Deporting foreign criminals is exactly what US President Donald Trump promised to do during his 2024 election campaign. Since then, the word “deportation” has become a lightening rod, conjuring up images of American ICE agents detaining five-year-olds and shooting their own citizens. You can’t talk about this issue, and use the identical vocabulary, without being linked to the current administration in Washington.

So why is Poilievre using this language? There are two possible answers: one, he and his comms people don’t see it, or two, they do — and are making a calculated appeal to MAGA-friendly voters in Canada.

“This does a disservice to the very issue they are championing. The Conservatives know they aren’t going to get the changes they are asking for — but they will shore up their base, one third of which are Trump fans.

Why now? Poilievre’s party may have given him an 87 per cent endorsement at his policy convention, but he just lost another MP to the Liberals. His best frenemy, Durham MP Jamil Jivani, just returned from a White House meet-and-greet with his former law school buddy, Vice President J.D. Vance, which he warbled about all over social media. Caucus is grumbling at the prospect of Carney cobbling together a majority, leaving them warming the opposition benches for another three years. And the Liberals have a twelve-point lead in the polls, should they choose to call an early election.

The Conservatives’ concerns about immigration aren’t misplaced. But in the current climate, they’re more rage farm than reform….

Source: Tasha Kheiriddin: Pierre Poilievre’s deportation gamble

Malcolm: Liberals broke our immigration system. We need Conservatives to fix it.

Gives a sense of where the more extreme wing of Conservatives are. Some more realistic than others but overall, more a laundry list than serious, practical or politically viable. Malcolm, who did briefly work under Jason Kenney as a communications adviser, lacks the sophistication and nuance of her former boss:

Cutting off extended benefits for illegal immigrants is obvious, low-hanging fruit – so much so that the Conservatives shouldn’t waste political capital on it. They’re going to get called “racist” by elites and Liberals no matter what, so why not propose something meaningful?

Here are some ideas:

  • End all temporary foreign work programs
  • Deport all illegal immigrants
  • Fast-track asylum hearings, or possibly send asylum claimants to a third party location while they await hearings (like Australia does with Nauru)
  • Require visas from countries that abuse our asylum system. Automatically reject asylum claims from students whose visas are expiring
  • Limit student visas to 5% of any college or university’s student body
  • Reduce or pause economic immigration streams until GDP per capita grows by a certain per cent per year
  • Bring back in-person interviews for all immigrants
  • Crack down on immigration fraud and strip citizenship from those who committed fraud to become a citizen, show allegiance to a foreign terrorist group, or are convicted of a violent crime or gun crime
  • Reserve social benefits for citizens, require visa-holders (including PRs) to buy health insurance
  • Fortify Canadian citizenship: Adopt the Swiss model and require newcomers to spend 10 years living in Canada, pass a grade 12 equivalent English/French course, show sincere knowledge of Canadian customs and history, show financial stability (no social assistance use or major debts) and require references from Canadians citizens
  • Most importantly for Conservatives: whatever you do, DON’T listen to people like Andrew Coyne!

It was the Liberals who broke our immigration system and destroyed the consensus. A majority of Canadians now oppose mass immigration. A majority say numbers are too high and must be lowered

Canadians rely on Conservatives to clean up the mess made by Liberals, and right now Conservatives have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to address very real problems and propose a strong and secure system for our future. It needs to be based in self-respect and a revitalized national pride. This is one area where Conservatives can meaningfully differentiate themselves from Liberals. They must confidently and unapologetically propose real changes.

Source: Malcolm: Liberals broke our immigration system. We need Conservatives to fix it.

Hundreds of American nurses choose Canada over the U.S. under Trump

Of note:

…The Millers are part of a new surge of American nurses, doctors, and other health care workers moving to Canada, and specifically British Columbia, where more than 1,000 U.S.-trained nurses have been approved to work since April.

Many nurses have felt the draw of Canada’s progressive politics, friendly reputation, and universal health care system, which stands in contrast to what they see as authoritarian policies under Trump along with deep cuts to funding for public healthinsurance, and medical research.

Additionally, some nurses were incensed last year when the Trump administration said it would reclassify nursing as a nonprofessional degree, which would impose strict federal limits on the loans nursing students could receive.

Canada is poised to capitalize. Two of its most populous provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, have streamlined the licensing process for American nurses since Trump returned to the White House. British Columbia also launched a $5 million advertising campaign last year to recruit nurses from California, Oregon, and Washington state. 

“With the chaos and uncertainty happening in the U.S., we are seizing the opportunity to attract the talent we need,” Josie Osborne, the province’s health minister, said in a statement announcing the campaign….

Source: Hundreds of American nurses choose Canada over the U.S. under Trump

Canada will slash millions in spending meant to help immigrants. Here’s how hard Ontario is being hit

As expected given decline in overall numbers. Odd that services will be restricted to economic immigrants given that they are largely selected on the basis of higher levels of human capital and thus arguably in less need than other categories:

The federal government is going to slash its immigrant settlement funding by $98.1 million this year, including a 17.3 per cent reduction for organizations that support newcomers in Ontario, the Star has learned.

The across-the-board funding reductions outside Quebec are expected to affect all services, including employment counselling, information and orientation, translation help for appointments and other supports to assist newcomer integration. Newcomer women and caregivers, survivors of trauma, people with disabilities and others who are likely to delay language and other programs are feared to be disproportionately affected, though refugee services won’t be affected by the cuts.

The 9.5 per cent overall cut for the 2026-2027 fiscal year is in addition to the previously announced spending cuts to end all English classes beyond level 4 of the Canadian Language Benchmark (the government’s language assessment system with levels from 1 to 12) by September 2026. New eligibility will also take effect on April 1 to restrict access to services for economic immigrants.

Immigrant service agencies in Ontario will see funding reduced to $424.6 million from $513.6 million in 2025-2026. The hardest hit province is British Columbia, which will see a 25 per cent reduction in settlement funding, followed by Nova Scotia (23.3 per cent) and Prince Edward Island (22 per cent).

“The department recognizes the challenging impact these funding decisions will have on service provider organizations, and we will strive to provide transparent and timely information, as well as to respond to any concerns,” assistant deputy immigration minister Catherine Scott said in a Feb. 13 email to service agencies. “We can jointly ensure service continuity for clients.”

All funded agencies are expected to be contacted by the department before the end of the week on how their individual programs will be affected, as resources will also be reallocated to support organizations that serve French-speaking clients as a result of Ottawa’s priority to boost francophone immigration outside Quebec. 

The news has sent another shock wave to service providers, who had already had federal funding for the sector reduced from about $1.17B in 2024-25 to $1.12B in the current fiscal year.

“It’s a one-two punch,” said the executive director of one multiple service agency, who asked not to be identified for fear of repercussions to his organization by the department….

Source: Canada will slash millions in spending meant to help immigrants. Here’s how hard Ontario is being hit

Depuis la fin du PEQ, les immigrants francophones se tournent vers d’autres provinces

Not surprising:

…“« Le fait qu’il y ait potentiellement des francophones qui, ne pouvant pas obtenir la résidence permanente au Québec, choisissent de s’installer dans une autre province est certainement une occasion », explique Kimberly Jean Pharuns, directrice générale de l’Observatoire en immigration francophone du Canada.

Les organismes de défense du fait français partout au pays martèlent depuis des années que l’immigration francophone est l’une des solutions pour rétablir le poids démographique des francophones au pays. La ministre de l’Immigration, Lena Metlege Diab, a promis de rétablir la proportion de francophones au Canada d’ici 2029, notamment en augmentant les cibles fédérales d’immigration francophone hors Québec.

La fin du PEQ pourrait-elle aider cet objectif ? Oui et non, selon Kimberly Jean Pharuns. « Les choses ne sont pas aussi simples, parce qu’il faut vraiment prendre en considération la nécessité d’avoir un bon niveau d’anglais pour pouvoir s’intégrer sur le marché du travail à l’extérieur du Québec, résume-t-elle. Ce n’est pas comme si tous les gens qui avaient prévu de s’installer au Québec pouvaient, en claquant des doigts, s’en aller au Manitoba ou en Saskatchewan. »

“Le Canada atteint depuis quatre ans ses cibles d’immigration francophone hors Québec. En 2026, 5000 places seront réservées pour les francophones voulant s’installer ailleurs qu’au Québec.”

Source: Depuis la fin du PEQ, les immigrants francophones se tournent vers d’autres provinces

This material may be protected by copyright.

Migrant farm workers’ class-action suit against Canadian government certified

To watch:

An Ontario court has cleared a major hurdle for migrant farm workers to pursue a Charter challenge against Ottawa for systemic racism and discrimination.

On Monday, the Superior Court of Justice certified a $550 million class-action lawsuit initiated by two lead plaintiffs, Kevin Palmer and Andrel Peters, who were brought to Canada under the federal government’s seasonal agricultural farmworker program (SAWP).

The lawsuit alleges that their rights were violated under the “tied employment” provisions of the program that restricted them to work for a named employer only, and their “compelled” payments to Canada’s employment insurance premiums despite their disqualification from receiving the benefits.

The certified class will cover current and former agricultural workers who are or were employed in Canada on a contract basis under SAWP, on or after Jan. 1, 2008. The federal government has already identified precisely 74,785 people who are members of the class, and has produced a class list with each member’s personal information.

Launched in 1966, the SAWP allows agricultural employers to hire temporary foreign workers from Mexico and participating Caribbean countries for up to eight months a year when qualified Canadians are unavailable. Between 30,000 and 40,000 seasonal migrants come to work here via the program each year.

In his decision, Judge Edward M. Morgan concluded that the plaintiffs’ proposed common issues predominate over any individual issues in the action, and focus on a common set of conditions imposed on all class members in the SAWP. 

“The breaches alleged are systemic and apply across the class,” Morgan wrote in his 25-page decision. “The Charter claims focus on state action in imposing oppressive and liberty-restricting terms in the SAWP contracts and legislation/regulation.

“Likewise, the unjust enrichment claim arises from a set of facts imposed by legislation and held in common by all class members — i.e. the payment of EI premiums, accompanied by restrictions imposed in the EI scheme and the SAWP that prevented access to EI benefits….

Source: Migrant farm workers’ class-action suit against Canadian government certified

Senate committee calls for gutting of flagship immigration bill over human rights concerns

In the end, Senate approved without amendments:

A flagship bill that would tighten Canada’s immigration and asylum rules should be gutted, with key sections removed to address concerns regarding human rights and privacy, a Senate committee has recommended. 

The Senate committee on social affairs, science and technology has been studying Bill C-12 and hearing from experts. In a new report, it expressed fears that parts of the proposed legislation would lead to an “overreach of executive powers” and have a disproportionate impact on women and members of the LGBTQ community. 

The Senate committee called for the deletion of parts 5 to 8 of the bill and, failing that, for substantial amendments including to sections tightening up Canada’s asylum system. 

The Senate committee on public safety, which has also been examining Bill C-12, reviewed the proposed legislation in detail on Monday and discussed amendments after considering the social affairs committee’s recommendations. 

Of particular concern to the social affairs committee was part 8, which would prevent asylum seekers who have been in Canada for more than a year from having claims for refugee protection heard by the independent Immigration and Refugee Board.

The purpose of the rule, according to Immigration Department officials who addressed senators, is to prevent potential misuse of the system, such as by international students who claim asylum because they want to remain in Canada. 

But the Senate Social Affairs committee report warned that the change could mean that someone who visited Canada as a baby for a day and later returned at age 10 could be deemed ineligible to be heard at the independent tribunal. …

Source: Senate committee calls for gutting of flagship immigration bill over human rights concerns

John Lorinc: This is the real crisis of Canadian immigration

Valid concern although I think Alberta is more open to immigration than Premier Smith calculates:

…Just think about Alberta premier Danielle Smith’s address to the province last week, in which she mentioned immigration no fewer than 17 times, disparaging the “status quo” system, and claiming that current (and significantly reduced) immigration levels are “out of control” and “overwhelming our core social services.” Those are the words of someone making hay.

It is worth noting that Trump hasn’t yet targeted Canadian immigration and diversity policies in his obsessive campaign to subsume America’s closest ally in the name of hemispheric hegemony. Yet. But even a cursory scan of the cultural horizon — Bad Bunny’s Spanish lyrics, Trump’s determination to edit out Black Americans’ experiences in the name of national pride — would indicate we are as just likely to become targets of his white supremacy as Europe.

Culture warriors don’t care about policy or data, and if the Carney government doesn’t get that basic fact, it will lose the existential fight to rebuild public confidence in our migration system, whether or not we continue to tell ourselves that diversity is our strength.    

Source: Opinion | John Lorinc: This is the real crisis of Canadian immigration

Nadeau | Une aubaine!

Good critique of some Quebec immigration discourse:

..Au temps où Gérald Godin était ministre des Communautés culturelles et de l’Immigration, il écrivait ceci dans sa lettre type adressée aux immigrants : « Avec tous les Québécois, je me réjouis de votre arrivée chez nous. Je suis persuadé que votre dynamisme est le meilleur gage de votre adaptation à notre collectivité. Bienvenue au Québec. » Et il ajoutait ces mots : « Nous vous attendions. »

En plusieurs pays, le mépris envers les immigrants est aujourd’hui inouï. Pas une semaine ne passe sans que l’on désigne « les étrangers » comme les coupables commodes de tous les maux. Rien de plus facile que de crier au loup. Mais il faut distinguer les faits des fantasmes qu’entretient une idéologie de repli : pendant qu’elle désigne les étrangers comme coupables, elle épargne toute l’année les milliardaires qui se croient tout permis, comme l’affaire Epstein le montre.

La suspension d’une mesure d’immigration comme le Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ) profite désormais au reste du Canada, qui pourra attirer les immigrants francophones rejetés du Québec. Radio-Canada nous apprend que le nombre d’immigrants temporaires francophones du Québec qui cherchent désormais à s’installer ailleurs a quadruplé en un an. Plusieurs expliquent ce départ par l’abolition controversée du PEQ.

“Tout en répétant que la francophonie canadienne a des allures de mouroir, les nationalo-conservateurs québécois se privent paradoxalement de ceux qui pourraient l’aider à vivre. Ils dénoncent le déclin, mais ferment la porte à ceux qui pourraient l’enrayer. Ils invoquent la protection d’une culture, tout en sabotant les conditions mêmes de sa régénération et de sa transmission.

À force de confondre protection et fermeture, identité et repli, ces gens-là en viennent à transformer un projet de société en forteresse médiévale. Ce faisant, ils condamnent lentement mais sûrement ce qu’ils prétendent sauver. Qui en tire profit ?

Source: Nadeau | Une aubaine!

.. At the time when Gérald Godin was Minister of Cultural Communities and Immigration, he wrote this in his standard letter addressed to immigrants: “With all Quebecers, I look forward to your arrival with us. I am convinced that your dynamism is the best guarantee of your adaptation to our community. Welcome to Quebec. “And he added these words: “We were waiting for you. ”

In many countries, contempt for immigrants is now unheard of. Not a week goes by without being designated “foreigners” as the convenient culprits of all evils. Nothing is easier than shouting wolf. But it is necessary to distinguish the facts from the fantasies of a retreat ideology: while it designates foreigners as guilty, it spares billionaires all year round who believe everything is allowed, as the Epstein case shows.

The suspension of an immigration measure such as the Quebec Experience Program (QEP) now benefits the rest of Canada, which may attract Francophone immigrants rejected from Quebec. Radio-Canada informs us that the number of temporary French-speaking immigrants from Quebec who are now looking to settle elsewhere has quadrupled in one year. Many explain this departure by the controversial abolition of the PEQ.

“While repeating that the Canadian Francophonie looks like dying, the Quebec National Conservatives paradoxically deprive themselves of those who could help it live. They denounce the decline, but close the door to those who could stop it. They invoke the protection of a culture, while sabotaging the very conditions of its regeneration and transmission.

By dint of confusing protection and closure, identity and retreat, these people come to transform a society project into a medieval fortress. In doing so, they slowly but surely condemn what they claim to save. Who benefits from it?

Conservatives call for investigation into asylum seekers’ access to health care

Safe target for the CPC… Arguably, recent changes by the government provide a needed correction:

The Conservatives plan to put a motion before the House of Commons on Tuesday aimed at reviewing how health benefits are provided to asylum seekers and restricting who has access to those services.

The planned text of the motion, which has been shared with The Canadian Press, says the cost of the Interim Federal Health Program has more than quadrupled since the 2020 fiscal year, growing from $211-million to $896-million in 2024-25.

That data was pulled from a report by the parliamentary budget officer published earlier this month.

In that report, which was requested by the House of Commons health committee, the PBO projects the program’s cost will reach $1.5-billion annually in 2028-29.

The federal government provides a host of medical services to asylum seekers, refugees and other protected persons through the Interim Federal Health Program.

Those services include routine medical treatment, hospital visits and lab work, and supplementary coverage for services like urgent dental procedures, some vision care, psychological therapy and prescription drugs. 

The Conservative motion calls for a review of the benefits provided to asylum claimants to find savings, and for asylum seekers appealing a rejected claim to be covered only for emergency, life-saving care. 

The motion also calls for an annual report to Parliament on program usage, with a specific focus on supplementary benefits, which generally aren’t covered for Canadians.

The PBO report says about 624,000 people were beneficiaries of the Interim Federal Health Program in 2024-25, up from about 200,000 people in 2020-21. A majority of those beneficiaries are asylum claimants….

Source: Conservatives call for investigation into asylum seekers’ access to health care