Foreign donations to foster extremist ideology fly under Canada’s radar
2015/06/03 2 Comments
More on alleged foreign funding of fundamentalism, and the irony that these are from the same countries that are opposed to ISIS:
It has been widely suspected for years that wealthy Gulf Arabs from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar have been bankrolling conservative Wahhabi and Salafist institutions and teachings in western countries. The strict and puritanical interpretations of Islam have no direct links to terrorism. Still, security experts say the conservative ideologies offer fertile ground for individuals contemplating jihad.
Richard Fadden, the prime minister’s national security adviser, told the committee in April that money is coming into Canada to promote extremist ideology and much of it is going to religious institutions. That followed similar testimony to the committee by an imam who manages 13 mosques across the country.
“I think it’s fair to say, without commenting on the particular country of origin, there are monies coming into this country which are advocating this kind of approach to life,” said Fadden.
“A lot of these funds, I think, are directed to religious institutions or quasi-religious institutions. It’s very difficult in this country to start poking about, if you’ll forgive my English, religious institutions because of the respect that we have for freedom of religion.”
There are no restrictions on non-resident charitable donations coming into Canada, provided they are not from a banned terrorist organization. Most donations arrive by bank wires, which CRA does not have the ability to track because it does not have access to banking transactional records or money services business records.
Instead, non-resident gifts of more than $10,000 must be disclosed by the charities. Beyond that, however, Canada Revenue has no way of knowing how much of that money is directed to Islamic religious and educational programming.
“We know that that’s no ideal and we want to be able to collect better information and we’re looking at that actively now,” Hawara told the committee. (The agency is able to track foreign donations directed for political purposes and routinely audits the appropriateness of all charities’ activities and whether they support the organizations’ charitable objectives, among other things.)
The millions of dollars coming to Canada from wealthy Gulf states are for all sorts of purposes, including to support organizations that may ultimately be determined to be fronts for terrorist organizations, or affiliated with them, said Christine Duhaime, a leading expert on terrorist financing and money-laundering.
“It tends not to be funds directly sent to support overt acts of terrorism in large volumes (here). If we had that happening, terrorist groups in Canada would be more powerful and already causing damage to critical infrastructure. Yet, there is funding for so-called extremist purposes, including for terrorist propaganda.”
Foreign donations to foster extremist ideology fly under Canada’s radar | Ottawa Citizen.

I’m surprised that this seems to be a surprise. If I remember correctly French scholar Gilles Kepel wrote in “Jihad: the Trail of Political Islam” in 2000 about the expansion abroad to Muslim communities of extremist Wahhabi Islam – through mosques, schools, foundations – massively financed by Sunni Saudi Arabia, newly ultra-rich with oil money after the oil price explosion of the mid-1970s, and in ideological-religious competition with Shia Iran after the Iranian Revolution of 1979, with the Soviet Afghan war of the 1980s serving as a military training ground for future jihadists and as a source of further radicalization, as is happening now in Syria and Iraq. Extremist ideology breeds extremist action. Extreme versions of Marxism led to the terrorist waves of the 1970s and 1980s. There is a straight line from Wahhabi fundamentalist arrogance and purist absolutism to terrorism. This ideological plague, financed by the industrial world’s thirst for oil, has been brewing for a long time. Precise statistics and information about these financial flows would in this case be very useful however much our present Harper government seems to abhor the gathering of data. Blindness, in this case, is not bliss.
Fair comment. Linkages may, however, be a bit more complex and indirect.