HESA: How We Choose to Respond to Crises
2025/02/19 Leave a comment
Some good questions where universities and academics should make a contribution regarding current and future challenges, some driven by Trump, some long-term. Surprising no immigration questions (e.g., how to manage population demographics without relying solely on immigration, how do we come up with a balanced immigration policy that incorporates pressures on housing, healthcare and infrastructure):
…The first and most important way that could happen? By putting the collective brainpower of Canadian academia to work on very specific problems that our governments—with their brutally short-term focus—cannot hope to answer quickly. Imagine if all Canadian universities got together right now and said: we are putting our best minds together for the next 12 weeks (which is about how long it will take for an election to occur, assuming the Liberals lose a confidence vote in late March) and we’re going to answer the following questions about the future of Canada.
- What does a post-NATO foreign policy look like. Who are our allies now?
- What does an independent defense policy look like now? What can we learn from, say, Finland’s posture with the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s? Is universal national service an option?
- How can Canada improve the status of its domestic knowledge-based industries? How do we make “smart” pay?
- What would it take for Canadian businesses to genuinely pivot to new markets? What are the barriers and how can they be overcome?
- More generally, how do we once again generate economic growth?
- How can we best balance the protection of our democracy with the maintenance of norms of free speech?
It’s obvious the country needs answers to all of these hard questions. It’s equally obvious that the country’s universities are collectively the largest source of expertise to answer them. So let’s do it, now. Get a couple of hundred of the best minds in the country, relieve them of whatever other duties they have for the next few weeks and put together a lightning Royal Commission the likes of which we’ve never seen. It would be tough to organize, but who knows? It might remind people that universities are worth funding (Lord knows nothing else seems to be working on that score).
- But I think universities will also need to go further. They will also need to look critically at whether what universities currently do is aligned with the new priorities. So maybe a second group of top minds could answer questions such as:
- What would be the impact on national productivity if we re-shaped the bachelor’s degree to be default three years instead of four?
- Would we be more growth-oriented if we had more bachelor’s graduates, or fewer? What about graduate degrees?
- How would postsecondary education change if we introduced a form of national service?
- What role could business faculties play in promoting trade diversity? Would requiring students to take more foreign language courses help?
- How might more specialist outfits like Citizen Lab contribute to Canadian domestic and foreign policy?
I suspect many will recoil from even posing such questions. Sacred cows, etc. But we have to. We can either, as a sector, act to protect and improve the state we have, or we can leave it easier prey to the bullies, liars, and thieves that are currently assaulting democracies around the globe. Those are the choices.
Canada made difficult choices and took bold action thirty years ago. I am certain we can do it again. But the country—and the higher education sector—first has to take the threat seriously. Will we?
