COVID-19 Immigration Effects – July 2023 update
2023/10/09 Leave a comment
Regular monthly data. Unfortunately, Permanent Residents source country not updated on open data and web data for study permits also not available.
Working site on citizenship and multiculturalism issues.
2023/10/09 Leave a comment
Regular monthly data. Unfortunately, Permanent Residents source country not updated on open data and web data for study permits also not available.
2023/10/06 Leave a comment
Of note. Remember all the traffic complaining about FATCA and the cost of renunciation so no surprise that some of those who paid the higher fee are suing:
The price of being an American who lives abroad is often an accent that sticks out, jokes about culinary inferiority and sometimes even issues opening a bank account or buying a home.
But for some former citizens, the price to renounce that status has long been steep. Now many of them want refunds, filing a class-action lawsuit Wednesday to try to get their money back.
It marks a new stage in a yearslong battle by “accidental Americans” — U.S. citizens who neither live in the country nor have any real ties to it but must still pay taxes to Uncle Sam — to reduce the costs they face.
The $2,350 that Rachel Heller paid to renounce her citizenship years ago was almost equivalent to her monthly salary.
The State Department announced Monday it would be dropping the fee back down to $450, the amount it used to charge until 2014. Heller, a Netherlands resident and one of the lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, wants a refund of the difference.
Source: ‘Accidental’ Americans’ launch lawsuit for refund on cost of renouncing U.S. citizenship – NBC News
2023/10/05 Leave a comment
The chart below breaks down the 1,534 signatures as of 3 October by province. No significant change but small overall uptick.

And if you haven’t yet considered signing the petition, the link is here: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4511
Petition closes 10 October.
2023/10/04 Leave a comment
I really enjoyed working on this analysis with the ICC. Check out the report and tables:
The proportion of permanent residents taking up Canadian citizenship within ten years of arrival declined 40% between 2001 and 2021. Today, the Institute for Canadian Citizenship is publishing a new analysis conducted by expert researcher Andrew Griffith, which examines this trend more closely.
Less than 50% of citizenship-eligible permanent residents from top immigration source countries are becoming Canadian citizens within ten years of arrival. This is the case for permanent residents from China (30%), India (49%), South Korea (35%), United Kingdom (43%) and United States of America (48%), among other top source countries.
A prevailing theory on the cause of declining naturalization rates is that a growing number of immigrants to Canada come from countries that prohibit multiple citizenships. This research debunks this claim. The proportion of permanent residents from countries that prohibit naturalization has grown, but the increase in the number of permanent residents choosing not to become citizens is higher amongst source countries that allow dual citizenship. Between Census 2016 and Census 2021, the number of permanent residents from India choosing not to become Canadian citizens increased by 47%. For permanent residents from China, it increased by 40%. Both countries prohibit dual nationality. For those from the Philippines, which allows dual nationality, the number of permanent residents choosing not to become Canadian citizens increased by 64%.
For those who do become citizens, the time between arrival and naturalization has increased significantly. Between 2005 and 2022, permanent residents who arrived under the Economic category took 21% longer to naturalize at 6.1 years on average. For the Family Reunification Class, time increased 17% to 7.4 years on average. Among source countries, time to naturalization for permanent residents from China increased almost 70% to 7.9 years, while for the Philippines it increased almost 30% to 6.6 years. India remained relatively stable at 6.1 years on average. Permanent residents from Iran saw the largest increase overall, 181%, taking 12.5 years to naturalize, on average.
While fewer permanent residents are naturalizing overall, 92% of naturalizations take place within ten years. In other words, if a permanent resident chooses not to become a Canadian citizen within ten years of arriving in Canada, it is unlikely that they will ever choose to do so. This finding highlights the first ten years as a critical period to intervene.
Source: New ICC research lifts lid on declining naturalization rates
2023/09/30 Leave a comment
More likely than unlikely:
The immigration minister does not believe universities like McGill and Concordia will be hampered in their recruitment efforts owing to new rules imposing more French on international students.
Christine Fréchette said university recruitment was not hampered in the previous incarnation of the Quebec Experience Program (PEQ),which international students use to enter Quebec combining school with career aims. In 2019, the government slapped limits on the range of disciplines eligible, sparking an uproar from students that forced it to back down.
And on Thursday, Fréchette said she does not believe another new set of rules, this time imposing more French on PEQ candidates, will do what the universities predict.
“For me this argument is not backed up by the numbers,” Fréchette said answering a question from the Montreal Gazette. “I think that McGill has an attraction, an appeal that is worldwide.
“They will be able to attract international students even though we have changed the rules of the PEQ diplomé.”
Last week, both McGill University and Concordia University slammed Fréchette’s new rules, which are part of a massive reform of Quebec’s immigration system.
In two separate briefs presented to the legislature committee studying the reforms, they said the new French language requirements included in the new PEQ will mean international students will be deterred from applying, thus depriving Quebec of their skills and talent.
The PEQ welcomes a wide range of academic options and is hugely popular, but in May Fréchette announced changes to the way the program works. In an effort to increase the French skill level of applicants — in the same way as her overall immigration reforms in the economic category, which Quebec controls — Fréchette introduced a distinction between francophone and anglophone applicants.
Foreign students who studied in French or are francophone will benefit from a fast-tracked system designed to retain them. Instead of the 12 to 18 months of work experience currently required to apply for a certificate leading to permanent residency, a request can be made as soon as they complete their studies.
But students who come to Quebec to study in English and do not have a sufficient knowledge of French will no longer qualify for the PEQ and the advantages it offers.
McGill argues the rules will create a two-tier system because most of its 12,000 foreign students will not meet the new qualifications.
“Our students risk emerging as the losers in this exercise,” Fabrice Labeau, McGill’s deputy provost of student life and learning, told the committee.
Concordia has a similar view and says the reforms will “de facto” exclude graduates from anglophone universities even if they master French.
The PEQ, or Programme de l’expérience québécoise, is a fast track for international students — some of whom may already be living and working in the province — to obtain a Quebec selection certificate, which is a step toward permanent residency.
International students can apply to the program, as can new arrivals who have obtained a degree at a Quebec institution in the last two years.
Source: McGill, Concordia unlikely to be hampered by new immigration rules: minister – Montreal Gazette
2023/09/28 Leave a comment
The chart below breaks down the 1,512 signatures as of 26 September by province. No significant change.
ICYMI: Minister Miller’s recent comments: New immigration minister says one-click citizenship oath still worth considering

And if you haven’t yet considered signing the petition, the link is here: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4511
2023/09/26 Leave a comment
Latest public statement by the Minister:
The new immigration minister is still considering a controversial option to allow new Canadians to take their oath of citizenship with the click of a button, but there are no immediate plans to implement it, he said Monday.
The government asked for public feedback in February about the idea to allow new Canadians to skip a virtual or in-person ceremony and opt instead to take the oath with the click of a mouse.
Consultation documents posted online say the new regulations were expected to come into force in June 2023, but the government has been mum about its plans since then.
The department is still mulling it over, Immigration Minister Marc Miller said Monday, and he thinks it’s a good idea.
“You don’t want to take these moments lightly, but we do need technological options,” Miller said on his way into Question Period.
“The department has been criticized, rightly, for not being adjusted to the 21st century and that option is one I think that we should preserve.”
It’s particularly important for people who live in remote or rural communities, who shouldn’t have to drive long distances to swear their oath, he said.
Earlier this year, then-immigration minister Sean Fraser pitched the idea as a temporary option to help work through backlogs of people waiting for their citizenship.
The change is expected to save people up to three months of processing time, the government consultation documents said.
The responses to that consultation offered mixed views on the idea: some called it a forward thinking approach, while others thought it would degrade the value of in-person ceremonies.
The department said in a statement Monday that the comments will “inform the next steps and the development of implementation plans.”
“I’ve heard from Canadians and advocates of the importance of actually being in person. I’ve also seen the importance of virtually, when there’s no question about someone’s loyalty or citizenship or oath or the seriousness he should take the Canadian citizenship,” Miller said Monday.
“It’s about keeping the options open in the 21st century.”
Miller said he’s administered the oath three times since taking over the immigration file during the summer cabinet shuffle, and recognizes that preserving an in-person option is “paramount.”
“We have to we have to obviously preserve those.”
The government expects in-person participation will drop even more once the one-click option is introduced, and there would likely be fewer ceremonies overall.
Conservatives have vowed to oppose the measure over concerns it would “cheapen” the citizenship oath.
The government wants to “reduce it all to a click on a website or an app as if citizenship were no more than consenting to terms in a contract,” Conservative immigration critic Tom Kmiec said in a statement Monday.
“The Trudeau Liberals are abandoning this special tradition and reducing our citizens to a bureaucratic number.”
During the pandemic, the government added the option to allow people to pledge their allegiance to Canada in a virtual ceremony, and the practice has continued.
“We saw a firefighter in B.C. that was able to do it on the fly,” Miller said, and suggested the option should remain.
“I think we need to maintain those.”
Even with the virtual ceremonies, there were still 68,287 people in the backlog as of July 23, waiting to take their oaths and enjoy all the benefits of Canadian citizenship.
Source: New immigration minister says one-click citizenship oath still worth considering
Link to petition opposing the change: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4511
2023/09/21 Leave a comment
The chart below breaks down the 1,503 signatures as of 19 September by province. No significant change.

And if you haven’t yet considered signing the petition, the link is here: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4511
2023/09/16 Leave a comment
Of note, more on the citizenship-by-investment industry:
A new passport index that has just been published provides a different perspective for investor immigrants to decide which citizenship by investment program of what country is best for them. Beyond just counting visa-free destinations, the index considers where travelers really want to go and understand why visa-free access to the U.S. or China might be more valuable than others.
Not all countries hold the same allure for travelers. For instance, while France welcomed over 66.6 million visitors in 2022, Sri Lanka saw only 719,978. The new index prioritizes destinations by their real-world appeal, offering a more nuanced perspective on passport power. While the index has just been published by Pace Law Firm, (where I practice law as an immigration attorney and for this reason am here revealing my interest in it), it is significant because it provides a unique insight into the world of citizenship by investment and international travel.
Evaluating Passports
According to the Pace index, it adds depth to the evaluation because it takes into account three main factors.
- Weighted Scoring: Countries are scored on a scale of 1 to 10, with 75% of the weight attributed to GDP and 25% to tourism.
- Simplicity with Depth: While the method is simple, it introduces thoughtful complexity. For example, to negate the Covid-19 impact, 2019’s tourism statistics are used. This ensures a passport’s overall appeal is gauged, independent of specific temporal fluctuations.
- Transparency: Setting itself apart, the Pace index offers complete transparency. Using publicly accessible data, it employs openly available code for data cleaning and analysis. Thus, the methodology stands open for scrutiny.
For these reasons, the index provides users with a useful tool to assess the value of a given country’s passport in considering things like investing in a country’s citizenship by investment program or in traveling with its passport.
Source: New Index Presents Different View Of Value Of Passports For Investors – Forbes