What is anti-Semitism? EU racism agency unable to define term

Surprising (to me) as this work by the EU was fundamental to many in having a working definition of antisemitism over the past years, and the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) formally adopted this definition at the Toronto plenary meeting this fall (Working Definition).

The actual text adopted by IHRA, in contrast to the earlier version of the EU, kept a narrow definition of antisemitism, dropping any reference to linkages between antisemitism and anti-Isreali positions.

What is anti-Semitism? EU racism agency unable to define term | JPost | Israel News.

No devil in Museum of History details

Further to my earlier post on the fears of Victor Rabinovitch, former director of the Canadian Museum of Civilization, an alternate more relaxed perspective by Christopher Dummit of Trent University, following the unveiling of the plans for the rebranded Canadian Museum of History:

David Morrison, the head of the team putting together the new Canada Hall, revealed that the main stories to be told were the relations between aboriginal peoples and European settlers, French — English relations, and the experiences of new immigrants. Political history would give structure to the exhibit but “the real content is the consequences of political history …. What did this mean to ordinary people?” He got out ahead of the critics by asserting that the museum would include many troubled aspects of the nation’s history including “residential schools, the imprisonment of Ukrainian Canadians during the First World War, anti-potlatch laws and the forced relocation of Japanese Canadians during the Second World War.”

Where were the swords and scythes, the royalists with machine guns, the mock lynching-in-absentia of Lester Pearson? Absent. For now, anyway. Perhaps between now and the opening, Harper’s history apparatchiks will descend to wreak their havoc. Maybe. More likely, the new museum will give us a benign version of Canada’s history — a museumified Canadian Studies 101.

No devil in Museum of History details.

Advice for Policy Makers and Researchers

While this was written to assist government scientists and policy makers better understand each other these are both very good lists, compiled by British and Australia policy makers and researchers. They capture the dynamic well between the technical expert and the more general policy advisor roles and perspectives, and tap into themes of ideology, evidence and risk of Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism.

Good reading both within the public service and with the political level, given some of the ongoing tensions regarding evidence and anecdote and how the different perspectives play out.

Top 20 things scientists need to know about policy-making

  1. Making policy is really difficult
  2. No policy will ever be perfect
  3. Policy makers can be expert too
  4. Policy makers are not a homogenous group
  5. Policy makers are people too
  6. Policy decisions are subject to extensive scrutiny
  7. Starting policies from scratch is very rarely an option
  8. There is more to policy than scientific evidence
  9. Public opinion matters
  10. Economics and law are top dogs in policy advice
  11. Policy makers do understand uncertainty
  12. Parliament and government are different
  13. Policy and politics are not the same thing
  14. The UK has a brilliant science advisory system
  15. Policy and science operate on different timescales
  16. There is no such thing as a policy cycle
  17. The art of making policy is a developing science
  18. ‘Science policy’ isn’t a thing
  19. Policy makers aren’t interested in science per se
  20. We need more research’ is the wrong answer

Top 20 things politicians need to know about science

  1. Differences and chance cause variation
  2. No measurement is exact
  3. Bias is rife
  4. Bigger is usually better for sample size
  5. Correlation does not imply causation
  6. Regression to the mean can mislead
  7. Extrapolating beyond the data is risky
  8. Beware the base-rate fallacy
  9. Controls are important
  10. Randomisation avoids bias
  11. Seek replication, not pseudoreplication
  12. Scientists are human
  13. Significance is significant
  14. Separate no effect from non-significance
  15. Effect size matters
  16. Data can be dredged or cherry picked
  17. Extreme measurements may mislead
  18. Study relevance limits generalisations
  19. Feelings influence risk perception
  20. Dependencies change the risks

 

Globe editor-in-chief shares his views of Canadian pluralism and how it has evolved – The Globe and Mail

Good overview that the challenges to Canadian multiculturalism remain the longer-term overall challenges in healthcare, education, labour, and citizenship. Strong inclusion and participation themes.

The overview also highlights some of the different levels of success of  different communities. None of this is terribly new or insightful; the challenge is developing effective programs and policies to reduce the gaps, while exercising policy modesty in the ability of government to address all the issues involved. For an analysis of these differences, see either Evidence or Anecdote chapter in Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism, or the excerpt in Inside Policy November 2013 (page 30).

Globe editor-in-chief shares his views of Canadian pluralism and how it has evolved – The Globe and Mail.

Holiday Book Sale: Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias – Until Dec 5

Although may not be everyone’s idea of a holiday gift, and many readers of this blog may have already read this book, Lulu is offering a 30 percent discount on my (and other Lulu) books, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism and Living with Cancer: A Journey.

This offer is valid from now to midnight, December 5. Promotion code is LULUVIP160199. 

Book shop link is Lulu – Policy Arrogance (also has link for Living with Cancer).

Only 14 copies available at this price, so if interested, don’t delay!

Nova Scotia Liberal breaks down in discussing photo of blackface character

Another example of a provincial politician getting into trouble over lack of sensitivity and understanding, in this case a politician of Dutch origin, Joachim Stroink, attending a Dutch Canadian christmas event.

Has been treated as a “learning opportunity” by all, it would appear, starting with awareness, in a province with a significant Black population, of the racism implicit in the development of the Zwarte Piet character.

Nova Scotia Liberal breaks down in discussing photo of blackface character.

Manitoba Tory leader defends ‘infidel atheists’ remark – Manitoba – CBC News

Tone deaf in trying to be inclusive. Imagine the furor if a Muslim leader wished a “happy Ramadan” to infidel Christians, Jews or Hindus or other religions.

If you want to be inclusive – and I will take Brian Pallister at his word – just say non-believers rather than “infidel atheists”, as the universality of the thought of wishing all people well, whatever their faith or lack of faith, is important.

Manitoba Tory leader defends ‘infidel atheists’ remark – Manitoba – CBC News.

Query over future of multiculturalism in Australia

For those interested in Australian debates over multiculturalism following the election of the Abbott government. Similar transition with respect to grant and contribution programs, when incoming Conservative government in 2006-7 started questioning program following previous government priorities.

Query over future of multiculturalism | SBS News.

Des universités disent non à la charte | Le Devoir

No surprise. Université de Sherbrooke and Université de Montréal have joined McGill and Bishop in opposing the Charter. Concordia, with its history of politicization and governance issues, has yet to pronounce.

Des universités disent non à la charte | Le Devoir.

German-funded Islamic studies contested by some Muslim groups | Germany

The usual debate between the fundamentalists, who want literal interpretations, and theological teaching more in line with the Western tradition of inquiry (Center for Islamic Studies in Münster).

After all, we don’t need another fundamentalist centre; we need centres that have a more open perspective, not just a mechanical what “is allowed and forbidden in Islam”. And that is critical to allowing participation in various consultative fora and play an active role:

The curriculum is only just being developed, but the attitude in which Islam will be taught is already visible when talking with the professors at the Center for Islamic Theology. Above all else, Mouhanad Khorchide says one must use intellect to understand religion. “The task of theology is to justify religion rationally and to take responsibility,” he said, adding that it’s not about an unquestioning acceptance along the lines of, “I live my religion because it’s there.” And with that statement, he also gives his critics a very clear answer.

German-funded Islamic studies contested by some Muslim groups | Germany | DW.DE | 02.12.2013.