Keith Boag highlights one aspect of France’s failure to integrate immigrants and their children, their portrayal in its national immigration museum:
Displays of books, magazines, pamphlets and buttons catalogue a history of French xenophobia.
There is poignant art representing the loneliness of exclusion and isolation from mainstream society.
It’s a pretty harsh and honest account, but still incomplete.
If there was anything said of the massacre of Algerians by Paris police in 1961, for instance, it wasn’t presented to draw my attention, and I missed it.
Nor was there much emphasis on why France should actually be proud to have immigrants settle here.
Marie Curie, who was born in Poland and became a French citizen, gets some attention. So does the German-born French composer Jacques Offenbach.
But the overall impression from the museum is one of “objectification, stereotyping and silencing,” in the words of Sophia Labadi, a scholar of cultural heritage.
She quotes the writer Ian McEwan to explain why it matters that a museum help us to understand the experiences of other people: “Imagining what it’s like to be someone other than yourself is the core of our humanity. It is the essence of compassion and the beginning of morality.”
There are ways to do it all this better, writes Labadi. She points to the immigration museum called 19 Princelet Street in London.
There you’ll find overt attempts to put you into the shoes of someone who, for instance, must decide which three possessions — and only three — to take as he or she leaves home for a new beginning in a different country.
There are interactive experiments to uncover the submerged racism hidden inside us.
It’s a teaching museum in modern ways that its French counterpart is not.
On one wall of the National Centre for the History of Immigration in Paris there is text titled “Welcoming Land, Hostile France.”
It reads in part, “In every era, public opinion reinvents the image of the non-integrating foreigner.”
The familiar prejudices
It describes the familiar prejudices: “Too many foreigners, too many competitors for work, bringing disease, potentially delinquent, politically threatening, irreducibly different.”
But then it finishes: “Nowadays more and more people are opening up to diversity.”
Really?
That optimism seems misplaced at the moment. The anti-immigrant National Front party led by Marine Le Pen is on the rise in France.
Here and elsewhere in the Western world political leaders are trying to outbid each other on tough-minded and hard-hearted promises to push back against refugees.
A video by the anti-immigrant group Open Gates that talks of the forced collective suicide of European nations went viral in Europe a week ago before YouTube took it down.
And all that was before the attacks in Paris on Friday.
So if France’s National Centre for the History of Immigration is to help us imagine “what it’s like to be someone else” and discover “the essence of compassion and the beginning of morality,” then it is at best a well-intentioned failure and at worst, not even well-intentioned, just a failure.