Fears tighter Finnish immigration laws could deter IT talent

Funny how suddenly more articles on Finland:

Business and industry leaders fear that Finland’s centre-right government’s stiffened resolve to reduce the inflow of immigrants and tighten work visa requirements will invariably hurt the economy and Finland’s reputation as a Nordic hub for technology and innovation.   

Finland will continue to struggle to attract international IT talent against the backdrop of hostile anti-immigration policies, according to a labour market stability survey conducted jointly by the Union of Academic Engineers and Architects (AEA/Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto) and the Union of Professional Engineers (Insinööriliitto).  

The survey found that 45% of technology and engineering professionals currently resident and working in Finland would have difficulty recommending the Nordic country as a welcoming destination for foreign talent to move to. Just 15% of respondents said they would recommend Finland as a worthwhile career move.   

The survey results coincide with data that reveals foreign inventors are playing a greater role in contributing to the innovation output of Finnish companies and research institutes. Data from 2023 showed that foreign inventors partnered in some 60% of patents sought by Finnish institutions and companies in that year. 

“This situation is unsustainable. Finland is driving the very people who can create future innovation and economic growth out of the country. It’s pointless for decision-makers to talk about improving recruitment conditions in the labour market if the reality for attracting foreign talent to the country is uninviting,” said Juhani Nokela, director of public affairs at the AEA.

Finland’s leading employer federations have opened a broad dialogue with key government departments to explore a range of innovative solutions to bolster the ability of public and private sector enterprises in Finland to more easily recruit IT talent from abroad, and in particular from non-European Union (EU) countries.  

Among the solutions presented by employer groups is a proposal that English replace Finnish as the primary working language in export-led industries. Business associations, led by Finland’s Chemical Industry Federation(CIF/Kemianteollisuus), are advocating the use of the English language as a tool to boost the country’s international competitiveness.   

Solutions grounded on a more pliable work-based migration policy combined with relaxing the strict requirement for Finnish or Swedish language skills would alleviate existing labour shortages, said Anni Siltanen, the CIF’s chief advisor on skills and competence.  

“If Finland really wants to attract the best possible talent it must find ways to do just that and not put limits on the number of foreign job applicants,” said Siltanen.  

Source: Fears tighter Finnish immigration laws could deter IT talent

Previously unreported data: the U.S. lost 45,000 college grads to Canada’s high-skill visa from 2017 to 2021

Of note, Canadian advantage in play:

Despite having some of the best universities and training programs in the world, the U.S. struggles to retain high-value international students, thanks to our outdated immigration system. Canada has historically been one of our competitors for talent, and new data obtained by the Niskanen Center demonstrates just how stark this problem has become. To remain competitive in the global market, the U.S. must find ways to prevent the continued loss of domestically-trained talent.

The data demonstrate that Canada is eager to profit from the valuable training of our graduates and can do so by taking advantage of the systemic shortcomings that often render our labor market inaccessible to these foreign students.

Niskanen recently obtained previously unreported (and still unpublished) data from the Canadian immigration office’s Statistical Reporting Group detailing top Express Entry applicants’ educational and citizenship backgrounds. Express Entry is Canada’s recruitment arm for skilled talent worldwide. Recipients can pursue permanent residence in Canada without requirements for employer sponsorship or secured employment. Express Entry applicants must demonstrate their language skills, educational credentials, and work experience and are then ranked as a part of Canada’s point-based system. Only the top applicants are invited to seek permanent residence.

According to the data we obtained, between 2017 and 2021, approximately 45,000 invitations went to skilled workers who received their postsecondary education in the U.S–88 percent of whom were not U.S. citizens.

This is especially disconcerting because many international students at American universities do want to work in the U.S. after graduation. What’s more,the U.S. desperately needs these students. Still, our outdated immigration system makes employing them unnecessarily difficult.

One of the most common pathways for international students to remain in the United States is Optional Practical Training, followed by a bid in the H-1B lottery. Unlike Express Entry, success in the H-1B lottery is not based on merit, but on a random selection of petitions chosen for adjudication. The most recent rate of selection was about one in four, meaning that nearly 75 percent of H-1B hopefuls never had the chance to put their credentials before U.S. immigration officials.

This lottery and the overall capacity restraints of the immigration system put the U.S. at a distinct disadvantage. We invest in educating and training thousands of international students every year, often with incredibly valuable skill sets. But then we don’t offer opportunities for these skilled individuals to stay and contribute to our economy after graduation–despite the high demand from employers. This amounts to our loss, and Canada’s gain.

Since 2013, Canadian companies have regularly run billboard advertisements in Silicon Valley to target foreign talent frustrated by the American immigration system’s limitations. These billboards are straightforward: “H-1B Problems? Pivot to Canada.”  Though they target individuals, companies are also responding.

According to Envoy Global’s 2022 Immigration Trends Report respondents, 71 percent of American employers are pursuing global strategies to retain talent that couldn’t obtain U.S. work authorization, with Canada being the top destination for employee relocation.

This is a win-win scenario for Canada. Immigrants arrive ready to work with highly sought-after skills, contribute to the Canadian economy in tax and consumption, and fill — or create — jobs that can stimulate further economic growth.

While international students make up less than 5 percent of all higher education enrollees in the U.S., they are vastly overrepresented in our most crucial fields. For instance, in electrical engineering, petroleum engineering, and computer sciencegraduate programs, approximately 80 percent of students are foreign-born. When the U.S. fails to provide ample and accessible visa pathways for these students after graduation, they take their valuable skills elsewhere–to our competitors’ benefit, and to our detriment.

This new data spells out in stark numbers what we had already reasonably deduced: that the U.S. is in the midst of a brain drain, and Canada is reaping the benefits as talent moves elsewhere to put their critical skills into practice. The U.S. must respond promptly by providing ample and viable visa pathways that can protect the educational investments made in these students.

Source: Previously unreported data: the U.S. lost 45,000 college grads to Canada’s high-skill visa from 2017 to 2021