‘Rising problem’ of ghost consultancies hits man who lost $12K trying to get Canadian visa for wife

2025/03/21 Leave a comment

Another example:

Krishan Jogia turned to an immigration consultancy before landing in Toronto in 2023, only to realize later — after spending thousands of dollars — that he had been dealing with a “ghost” consultancy apparently operating illegally in Canada.

Jogia, a dual Canadian-Australian citizen, sought the services of Canada Global Migration Consultants (GMC) for a Canadian visitor visa for his wife, Luana Cabral de Carvalho. They eventually received it, but things didn’t go as smoothly when they tried again for her spousal visa.

WELCOME TO CANADAIs it worth immigrating to Canada? These newcomers say it comes at a cost
IN DEPTHRegulator taking too long to rule on ‘bad actor’ immigration consultants, critics say
“Canada GMC visually, like if you’ve seen their YouTube, Instagram and website, comes off as very polished,” Jogia said. “When you call them, you get a proper help desk with hold music and everything.”

However, in early 2024, Jogia said, their consultant “just disappeared.” For months, he said, the consultancy kept ignoring them and shuffled them around to different colleagues. The two were able to get hold of that consultant, who is a registered immigration consultant, directly. He told them, in an email seen by CBC News, that they left Canada GMC due to “their unethical work practices.”

“We started really aggressively trying to pursue a refund, and that’s when they just stopped replying and just ignored us,” Jogia said.

Source: ‘Rising problem’ of ghost consultancies hits man who lost $12K trying to get Canadian visa for wife

Filed under Multiculturalism Tagged with

Why are Canadian immigration lawyers up in arms over proposed rules to target ‘ghost agents’?

2025/02/07 Leave a comment

Of note, applying to everyone rather than where the risk of fraud greater:

A government proposal to give authorities more power to investigate immigration consulting frauds is being criticized by lawyers as an overreach that fails to target the real culprits.

The proposed changes would grant immigration officials broad inspection power to investigate, adjudicate and penalize those who are unauthorized to give immigration advice for a fee, as well as licensed lawyers and consultants “counselling fraud and misrepresentation on their clients’ applications.”

However, provincial law societies and the Canadian Bar Association said lawyers are already subject to tight professional regulations. And they say the new rules would put them in a bind between their obligations under solicitor-client privilege and the ability to fight for their innocence.

“The regime would infringe on the law societies’ exclusive authority to govern their licensees,” the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, representing the 14 provincial and territorial law societies, said in a submission Monday in response to the government’s proposed changes. 

“The broad powers under the regime to inspect documents may be in conflict with the law of solicitor-client privilege in Canada.”

Currently, anyone who provides immigration advice for a fee must be a member of a law society or the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants, and immigration applicants are supposed to declare who their authorized representatives are.

While the professional regulators have the power to police and discipline their members for wrongdoing, many “ghost agents” — those who are unlicensed and offer immigration advice under the radar — have continued to operate without paper trails; many are overseas and beyond the reach of the regulators’ jurisdictions.

A parliamentary report in 2017 on improving oversight of immigration consultants raised concerns about weak governance of the consultants’ regulator and insufficient resources for investigations and enforcement. Among the recommendations were a policy review addressing the practice of “ghost consultants,” and considering increased fines and sentences.

The Immigration Department said unscrupulous agents “counselling fraud and misrepresentation” on clients’ applications are a threat to the integrity of Canada’s immigration and citizenship systems.

Source: Why are Canadian immigration lawyers up in arms over proposed rules to target ‘ghost agents’?

Filed under Immigration Tagged with , ,