Paris attacks illustrate the power of mockery – Saunders

Nice piece by Doug Saunders on the power of satire:

Mockery travels faster than news or analysis. While Charlie Chaplin’s Interview-style mockery of Adolf Hitler in The Great Dictator was not considered a major part of the arsenal against the Fuhrer in that predigital era (and certainly didn’t provoke violence), the instant spread of disrespectful imagery is capable of threatening entire edifices of authority overnight.

What Charlie Hebdo offended was not any broad community or religion or political tendency, but rather those militant few who are driven to revenge and violence at the prospect of disrespect. Its unsubtle, schoolyard style of humour, much like Mr. Rogen’s, turned off a lot of people and groups, but that’s a fully acceptable response to bad taste and not at all related to vengeful violence.

A century and a half ago, what the police called “respect crimes” were part of the political mainstream in countries such as Canada, where wounded honour was the cause for duels and vengeance. Gauntlet-throwing died out, in most places, for generations. But something has happened in the online age to make mockery, once again, into a potent instrument. The only reasonable response is to deploy it as often, and as mercilessly, as possible.

I remember reading Satanic Verses during the time of the fatwa and some of the passages took my breath away in the sharpness and humour of Rushdie’s use of satire to make his points.

Paris attacks illustrate the power of mockery – The Globe and Mail.

Unknown's avatarAbout Andrew
Andrew blogs and tweets public policy issues, particularly the relationship between the political and bureaucratic levels, citizenship and multiculturalism. His latest book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias, recounts his experience as a senior public servant in this area.

3 Responses to Paris attacks illustrate the power of mockery – Saunders

  1. Douglas Todd's avatar Douglas Todd says:

    Doug Saunders is incorrect in one thing. The Hebdo cartoons offended millions of Muslims deeply, including Muslim leaders in Canada who want to see them banned.

    • Andrew's avatar Andrew says:

      True, but the more interesting question is what percentage of Muslim leaders wanted them banned – along with equivalents for other religions – vs those more relaxed and accepting that religious satire goes along with freedom of speech. It is more the balance within the Muslim (or Jewish, Sikh, Christian etc) communities in the West between more open approaches to faith in contrast to more fundamentalist versions that is interesting, and how this dynamic plays out.

      Thanks for your comments and enjoy reading your pieces.

  2. Douglas Todd's avatar Douglas Todd says:

    Thanks a lot Andrew. Keep on plugging.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.