‘Birth tourists’ believed to be using Canada’s citizenship laws as back door into the West | National Post

More information on birth tourism in Canada following the release of Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s recent consultations with Canadians on the issue, and in the context of the government considering changes to the current policy of granting citizenship automatically to people born in Canada.

While the press account still lacks hard numbers in terms of percentage of births, the range of comments and anecdotes suggests that the numbers are largely than expected, with the practice extending to more communities.

Still find it surprising, given the sophistication of some of our provincial medicare systems, that no harder data available. After all, we know the total number of births (377,636 in 2011),  government medicare billing systems should be able to isolate those births paid by provincial plans, and provincial public servants should be able to provide some analysis behind the different categories of births not paid by medicare (e.g., births within the 3 month waiting period for provincial medicare coverage).

‘Birth tourists’ believed to be using Canada’s citizenship laws as back door into the West | National Post.

Unknown's avatarAbout Andrew
Andrew blogs and tweets public policy issues, particularly the relationship between the political and bureaucratic levels, citizenship and multiculturalism. His latest book, Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias, recounts his experience as a senior public servant in this area.

3 Responses to ‘Birth tourists’ believed to be using Canada’s citizenship laws as back door into the West | National Post

  1. Victoria's avatar Victoria says:

    The fact that they are unable to get hard numbers and are reduced to talking about “dozens and dozens” says to me that this phenomenon is a tempest in a teapot.

    It’s a headline that is almost guaranteed to make native citizens upset and call for “something to be done.”

    Personally I think the real scandal is that membership in a democratic nation is conferred in most cases via place of birth or birth to a citizen parent – things that no native can truly congratulate himself for since it was sheer dumb blind luck. We used to call an advantaged hereditary class an “aristocracy.” How in heaven’s name can such a thing be justified in a political community that calls itself “democratic”?

  2. Pingback: Canada’s birthright citizenship policy makes us a nation of suckers – Jan Wong | Multicultural Meanderings

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.